Skip to main content

Human Rights Commission urged to intervene in border village plight

By A Representative 
The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) has received an urgent appeal from human rights activist Kirity Roy, Secretary of Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha (MASUM), detailing severe human rights violations faced by residents of Chhat Khochabari, a border village in Coochbehar, West Bengal. The village, home to four Bhatiya Muslim families, is entirely enclosed by barbed wire fencing due to its proximity to the India-Bangladesh border, leading to what Roy describes as a state of “statelessness within their own country.”
According to Roy’s letter to the NHRC Chairperson, the Border Security Force (BSF) restrictions have drastically curtailed the villagers’ fundamental rights. The village, controlled by the Kalai Ghati Border Outpost (B.O.P), operates under strict gate timings, allowing residents to exit and enter only for three one-hour intervals daily. This has severely impacted their daily lives, particularly in medical emergencies, where residents are often forced to seek help in Bangladesh due to access restrictions to Indian healthcare.
The letter highlights several critical issues. Villagers face severe limitations on their freedom of movement, violating Article 21 of the Indian Constitution and Article 12 of the ICCPR. BSF restrictions on transporting farming materials and produce have hampered agricultural activities, violating Article 19(1)(g) of the Indian Constitution. The village lacks essential infrastructure, including roads, clean drinking water, healthcare facilities, electricity, irrigation, and sanitation, violating Article 21 and the Directive Principles of State Policy. BSF control extends to social events, including funerals and marriages, requiring prior permission, infringing on the right to freedom of religion (Article 25) and privacy (Article 21). Villagers are unable to sell or buy property due to BSF restrictions, violating Article 300A of the Indian Constitution.
Roy has urged the NHRC to relocate the BSF to the zero line (international border), conduct an immediate investigation into the living conditions, ensure the villagers’ right to movement, property, and livelihood, provide basic amenities, recommend policy changes to prevent similar restrictions, and provide relief and compensation.
The appeal emphasizes that these Indian citizens are living in conditions that resemble a prison, deprived of their basic rights and dignity. The NHRC is now expected to address these critical human rights concerns.

Comments

TRENDING

Manufacturing, services: India's low-skill, middle-skill labour remains underemployed

By Francis Kuriakose* The Indian economy was in a state of deceleration well before Covid-19 made its impact in early 2020. This can be inferred from the declining trends of four important macroeconomic variables that indicate the health of the economy in the last quarter of 2019.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”

Modi’s Israel visit strengthened Pakistan’s hand in US–Iran truce: Ex-Indian diplomat

By Jag Jivan   M. K. Bhadrakumar , a career diplomat with three decades of service in postings across the former Soviet Union, Pakistan, Iran, Afghanistan, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Germany, and Turkey, has warned that the current truce in the US–Iran war is “fragile and ridden with contradictions.” Writing in his blog India Punchline , Bhadrakumar argues that while Pakistan has emerged as a surprising broker of dialogue, the durability of the ceasefire remains uncertain.