Skip to main content

Activist seeks AG's consent to initiate contempt proceedings against BJP MP Nishikant Dubey

By A Representative 
Mujahid Nafees, convener of the Minority Coordination Committee (Gujarat) and a petitioner in a Waqf-related case before the Supreme Court, has written to Attorney General of India R. Venkataramani seeking consent to initiate criminal contempt proceedings against BJP MP Nishikant Dubey for his recent remarks against the judiciary.  
In his letter dated April 21, Nafees accused Dubey, the Lok Sabha MP from Godda (Jharkhand), of making "derogatory and scandalizing" statements against the Supreme Court, which allegedly undermine public confidence in the judiciary. The complaint cites Dubey’s interview with ANI on April 19, where he reportedly said, "In this country, only and only the Supreme Court is responsible for inciting religious wars" and accused the Court of "taking the country towards anarchy."  
Dubey also allegedly questioned the judiciary’s impartiality in cases involving religious disputes, such as the Ram Temple, Krishna Janmabhoomi, and Gyanvapi Mosque, while controversially stating on social media: "If the Supreme Court is to make laws, then Parliament should be shut down."  
Nafees argued that these remarks, made by a sitting MP, amount to "gross interference in the administration of justice" and violate the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. He urged the Attorney General to grant sanction for initiating legal action.  
The letter includes media reports from Hindustan Times, Livemint, The Hindu, and ANI as evidence. Legal experts suggest that if the AG grants consent, the matter could be taken up by the Supreme Court.  
Dubey, known for his outspoken criticism of the judiciary, has not yet responded to the complaint. The development comes amid heightened scrutiny of parliamentary conduct and judicial independence.  
Under Section 15 of the Contempt of Courts Act, consent from the AG or the concerned court is mandatory before initiating criminal contempt proceedings against individuals for scandalizing or obstructing justice.  

Comments

TRENDING

BRICS ends, but Bangladesh's empty chair says more than any declaration

By Nava Thakuria  The 18th BRICS Leaders' Summit, hosted by India at Bharat Mandapam in New Delhi on 12-13 September 2026, has concluded with leaders formally adopting the New Delhi Declaration. The gathering, themed "Building for Resilience, Innovation, Cooperation and Sustainability," drew Russian President Vladimir Putin, Chinese President Xi Jinping, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and other leaders of the now 11-member bloc, along with heads of partner organisations such as ASEAN, the African Union and the Eurasian Economic Union. Diplomats had worked through the final hours to bridge differences — notably between Iran and the UAE over West Asian tensions — before the declaration was signed.

Swaminarayan, untouchability and the 'we are not Hindu' argument

By Rajiv Shah   Following my blog on why the Eiffel Tower authorities should take all the blame for giving in to the Swaminarayan sadhus ’ bizarre demand to “invisibilise” women, including its female staff, during their visit to the internationally renowned Paris tourist centre on September 5, an interesting comment by one of the top academics drew my attention to something I vaguely knew about one of India’s most powerful and richest religious sects.

BAPS, the Eiffel Tower and the curious silence on secularism

By Rajiv Shah   I was a little surprised to see how some of those whom I respect for taking a firm stand on patriarchal issues reacted to the manner in which they responded to the recent incident in Paris, in which women employees of the Eiffel Tower were asked to remain "invisible" on September 5 when 100 BAPS sadhus visited one of the world's top tourist destinations.