Skip to main content

Pivotal figure in Indian cricket's renaissance, Eknath Solkar was a fielding star who redefined close-in catching

By Harsh Thakor* 
Born on March 18, 1948, Eknath Dhondu Solkar, arguably the greatest forward short-leg fielder in cricket history, sadly passed away on June 26, 2005, at the age of 57, due to a heart attack. He had been battling diabetes and other ailments for some time. His name remains an enduring star in the hearts of cricket fans. 
Solkar was a pivotal figure in Indian cricket's renaissance, playing a crucial role in the historic series victories in the West Indies and England in 1971.
Playing 27 Tests for India, primarily for his exceptional fielding, he took 53 catches. Solkar epitomized athleticism at its highest level. Watching him take a catch was akin to witnessing an acrobat or magician, pushing the boundaries of fielding into legendary realms. He brought a new spirit to the field, redefining the art of close-in catching.
Solkar specialized in forward short-leg, fielding without protective gear in an era when it was standard practice. Bishan Singh Bedi, who benefited greatly from Solkar's lightning reflexes and anticipation, remarked upon his death, "We would not have been the same bowlers without him."
He was also a reliable lower-order batsman, scoring over 1000 Test runs at an average of just over 25, and took 18 wickets with his slow-medium pace and chinaman deliveries.
In a 16-year first-class career, he scored 6,851 runs at 29.27, including eight centuries, took 276 wickets at 30.01, and claimed 190 catches. In his 27 Tests, he scored 1,068 runs at 25.42 and took 18 wickets at 59.44.
A gentle and versatile cricketer, he was sometimes called "a poor man's Sobers" due to his all-round abilities, capable of batting, bowling both fast and slow, and taking spectacular catches.
Solkar is also remembered for dismissing Geoff Boycott four times in 1971, famously sledging him with phrases like, "I'll get you, bloody." Boycott was so troubled by Solkar's bowling that he withdrew from the Test series. He also famously told Garry Sobers, "You play your game and I'll play mine," when Sobers attempted to intimidate him.
His fielding was instrumental in supporting India's spin quartet of Bedi, Chandrasekhar, Prasanna, and Venkataraghavan in the 1970s. Tall, athletic, and agile, Solkar mastered the dangerous forward short-leg position with his supple arms, quick reflexes, sharp eyesight, keen anticipation, and unwavering concentration – all without protective gear. His two-handed, diving catches were unique among close-in fielders.
When asked about his success, Solkar, affectionately known as "Ekky," simply said, "I only watch the ball." In a match against Australia in Calcutta in 1969-70, he took a remarkable catch off Bill Lawry, prompting Lawry to gift him his bat.
Humble Beginnings
Solkar's rise to Test cricket was remarkable, given his humble origins. The son of the groundsman at the PJ Hindu Gymkhana in Mumbai, he began by changing scoreboards. He shared a small, one-room quarter with his parents and five siblings. He started his career as a schoolboy cricketer, touring Sri Lanka in 1964 and later captaining the Indian schoolboys, including Sunil Gavaskar and Mohinder Amarnath, against London Schools in 1965-66. He developed a reputation as a world-class fielder, left-arm spinner, and solid batsman. He spent two seasons with the Sussex second XI, qualifying for the first team, but only played one match for the county.
He learned his cricket at the Gymkhana ground and joined the Bombay team in 1965. He scored a duck in his first innings but batted resiliently in the second, helping India draw the Test. His dedication to Bombay was evident in the 1968 Ranji Trophy final against Bengal, where he helped secure a crucial first-innings lead, despite his father's death the previous evening.
Test Career
He made his Test debut against New Zealand in Hyderabad in 1969-70, volunteering for the challenging short-leg position. He had a good series against Australia at home.
His consistent batting and spectacular catches in the West Indies in 1971 elevated him to stardom. In his first overseas Test in Kingston, he scored a gritty 61 in a 137-run partnership with Dilip Sardesai. He contributed to another crucial partnership in the fourth Test in Bridgetown, helping India save the match and win the series.
His experience in English conditions led to him opening the bowling with Abid Ali in the 1971 series. At Lord's, he scored 67 in a 92-run partnership with Gundappa Viswanath, giving India a first-innings lead. At The Oval, his catches of Alan Knott and Keith Fletcher were vital in India's victory. His catch of Knott, diving full-length to take the ball inches from the ground, was considered his finest. He also took 3 for 28 in the first innings and scored 44.
Despite limited success with bat and ball in the 1972-73 home series against England, he took 12 catches. His dismissal of Boycott in three consecutive innings was a highlight of the 1974 tour of England.
His only Test century, a painstaking 102 against the West Indies in Mumbai in 1974-75, marked his final significant contribution to Test cricket.
---
*Freelance journalist

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

  By Rajiv Shah   This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.

Love letters in a lifelong war: Babusha Kohli’s resistance in verse

By Ravi Ranjan*  “War does not determine who is right—only who is left.” Bertrand Russell’s words echo hauntingly in our times, and few contemporary Hindi poets embody this truth as profoundly as Babusha Kohli. Emerging from Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Kohli has carved a unique space in literature by weaving together tenderness, protest, and philosophy across poetry, prose, and cinema. Her work is not merely artistic expression—it is resistance, refuge, and a call for peace.

The golden crop: How turmeric is transforming women's lives in tribal India

By Vikas Meshram*   When the lush green fields of turmeric sway in the tribal belt of southern Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, and Gujarat, it is not merely a spice crop — it is the golden glow of self-reliance. In villages where even basic spices once had to be bought from the market, the very soil today is yielding a prosperity that has transformed the lives of thousands of families. At the heart of this transformation is the initiative of Vaagdhara, which has linked turmeric with livelihoods, nutrition, and village self-governance — gram swaraj.

Authoritarian destruction of the public sphere in Ecuador: Trumpism in action?

By Pilar Troya Fernández  The situation in Ecuador under Daniel Noboa's government is one of authoritarianism advancing on several fronts simultaneously to consolidate neoliberalism and total submission to the US international agenda. These are not isolated measures, but rather a coordinated strategy that combines job insecurity, the dismantling of the welfare state, unrestricted access to mining, the continuation of oil exploitation without environmental considerations, the centralization of power through the financial suffocation of local governments, and the systematic criminalization of all forms of opposition and popular organization.

Echoes of Vietnam and Chile: The devastating cost of the I-A Axis in Iran

​ By Ram Puniyani  ​The recent joint military actions by Israel and the United States against Iran have been devastating. Like all wars, this conflict is brutal to its core, leaving a trail of human suffering in its wake. The stated pretext for this aggression—the brutality of the Ayatollah Khamenei regime and its nuclear ambitions—clashes sharply with the reality of the diplomatic landscape. Iran had expressed a willingness to remain at the negotiating table, signaling a readiness to concede points emerging from dialogue. 

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

The price of silence: Why Modi won’t follow Shastri, appeal for sacrifice

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey*  ​In 1965, as India grappled with war and a crippling food crisis, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri faced a United States that used wheat shipments under the PL-480 agreement as a lever to dictate Indian foreign policy. Shastri’s response remains legendary: he appealed to the nation to skip one meal a day. Millions of middle-class households complied, choosing temporary hunger over the sacrifice of national dignity. Today, India faces a modern equivalent in the energy sector, yet the leadership’s response stands in stark contrast to that era of self-reliance.

False claim? What Venezuela is witnessing is not surrender but a tactical retreat

By Manolo De Los Santos  The early morning hours of January 3, 2026, marked an inflection point in Venezuela and Latin America’s centuries-long struggle for self-determination and independence. Operation Absolute Resolve, ordered by the Trump administration, constituted the most brutal and direct military assault on a sovereign state in the region in recent memory. In a shocking operation that left hundreds dead, President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores were illegally kidnapped from Venezuelan soil and transported to the United States, where they now face fabricated charges in a New York federal detention facility. In the two months since this act of war, a torrent of speculation has emerged from so-called experts and pundits across the political spectrum. This has followed three main lines: One . The operation’s success indicated treason at the highest levels of the Bolivarian Revolution. Two . Acting President Delcy Rodríguez and the remaining leadership have abandone...