Skip to main content

Parliamentary discussion on Indian Constitution: A missed opportunity for introspection

By Vikas Meshram* 
On the occasion of the 75th year of the implementation of the Indian Constitution, a four-day discussion was held in both Houses of Parliament. This was a golden opportunity for introspection. While drafting the world's largest written Constitution, our founding fathers deliberated on every word and article with utmost seriousness. This was an opportunity to revisit and reflect on the values embedded in our Constitution. The discussion should have focused not only on the structure of the Constitution but also on the progress of our nation, the success of its implementation, and the development of our democracy. Unfortunately, the essence of the discussion was completely lost, and it ended up being limited to personal accusations and counter-accusations.
The Indian Constitution is not just a written document; it is a vital charter of the principles, values, and goals of our nation. The values of "equality, liberty, justice, and fraternity" enshrined in the Preamble are not mere words; they should be reflected in every aspect of our national life. Our Constitution established a secular democratic republic. Beyond caste, religion, gender, language, and economic status, citizens must experience equality, liberty, and justice. But in the past 75 years, to what extent have we realized these values? Have we created an ideal model of accepting and respecting our differences? Have we overcome the past challenges of caste discrimination, religious tensions, and economic inequality? It was imperative to address these questions. However, instead of confronting these issues, the parliamentary debate devolved into political maneuvering.
Parliamentary discussions are supposed to be a platform for intellectual exchange. They serve as a medium for addressing national problems and suggesting solutions through deliberation. However, the quality of debates in recent times has been deteriorating. Personal accusations, political jibes, and criticisms have become the defining characteristics of parliamentary discussions. The debate held on the 75th anniversary of the Constitution was no exception. Both the ruling party and the opposition used this platform to further their political agendas. Instead of revisiting the principles and goals of the Constitution, the discussions resembled election rallies. The ruling party focused on exposing the opposition’s past mistakes, while the opposition spent time criticizing the policies of the government.
During the drafting of the Constitution, India was grappling with severe challenges such as Partition, religious strife, social fragmentation, and economic disparities. Despite these circumstances, the Constitution's architects chose the principles of liberty, equality, and fraternity to unify the nation.
Visionaries like Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad, Purushottam Das Tandon, and Alladi Krishnaswamy Ayyar contributed to its drafting. Despite differences of opinion, they set aside their disagreements to develop a collective vision for the nation. They embraced the ideals of equality and social justice, ensuring that every citizen, regardless of religion, caste, gender, or language, would have equal opportunities. However, today, our political debates glaringly lack their vision.
The 75th year of the Constitution’s implementation was a chance for us to introspect. Have we made proper use of the rights granted by the Constitution? Have we fulfilled our duties as citizens? Has public participation in democratic processes increased? These are questions that should have been addressed. Parliamentary debates could have provided a meaningful platform for introspection. Instead, these discussions were marred by personal accusations and counter-accusations. Political parties wasted time pointing out each other’s flaws but lacked the courage to acknowledge their own shortcomings.
Leaders must not limit their respect for the Constitution to mere oaths. They bear the responsibility of embodying its principles through their actions. They must take initiatives to ensure freedom, equality, and justice for all citizens.
Political parties need to move beyond electoral politics and focus on national interest. The debates should transcend personal criticism and blame games to formulate actionable strategies for the nation's progress and the realization of constitutional goals. The Constitution sets forth the ideal of fraternity, but today's scenario shows that we are straying from it. Social inequality persists due to divisions based on religion, caste, and language, often exacerbated for political gain. Fraternity must not remain confined to speeches but should be demonstrated through actions. Every citizen must internalize the value of fraternity and foster a sense of unity.
Parliamentary debates should not be restricted to verbal sparring. Discussions must be idea-centric, focusing on national problems and their solutions. By studying the thought processes of the Constitution’s framers, we can chart a path for national progress aligned with their vision.
Both the ruling and opposition parties must engage in respectful dialogue during parliamentary debates. These discussions should not be limited to political accusations and counter-accusations. Respecting the Constitution means embodying its principles in practice. Mere speeches or declarations will not suffice. Strengthening democratic processes and fulfilling constitutional objectives require proactive efforts.
Understanding the spirit of the Constitution and striving for national progress is every citizen’s duty. The Constitution is not just the philosophy of a single nation; it is an inspiring ideology that sets an example for the entire world.
The 75th anniversary of the Constitution was an opportunity for introspection, but it was squandered. Neither the ruling party nor the opposition made proper use of this occasion. The Indian Constitution has provided us with the ideals of fraternity, equality, and justice. These ideals should not remain confined to speeches; we bear the responsibility of realizing them through action. Translating the Constitution’s values into practice and paving the way for the nation’s progress is the true tribute to our Constitution.
---
*Senior journalist

Comments

TRENDING

The golden crop: How turmeric is transforming women's lives in tribal India

By Vikas Meshram*   When the lush green fields of turmeric sway in the tribal belt of southern Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, and Gujarat, it is not merely a spice crop — it is the golden glow of self-reliance. In villages where even basic spices once had to be bought from the market, the very soil today is yielding a prosperity that has transformed the lives of thousands of families. At the heart of this transformation is the initiative of Vaagdhara, which has linked turmeric with livelihoods, nutrition, and village self-governance — gram swaraj.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Authoritarian destruction of the public sphere in Ecuador: Trumpism in action?

By Pilar Troya Fernández  The situation in Ecuador under Daniel Noboa's government is one of authoritarianism advancing on several fronts simultaneously to consolidate neoliberalism and total submission to the US international agenda. These are not isolated measures, but rather a coordinated strategy that combines job insecurity, the dismantling of the welfare state, unrestricted access to mining, the continuation of oil exploitation without environmental considerations, the centralization of power through the financial suffocation of local governments, and the systematic criminalization of all forms of opposition and popular organization.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Echoes of Vietnam and Chile: The devastating cost of the I-A Axis in Iran

​ By Ram Puniyani  ​The recent joint military actions by Israel and the United States against Iran have been devastating. Like all wars, this conflict is brutal to its core, leaving a trail of human suffering in its wake. The stated pretext for this aggression—the brutality of the Ayatollah Khamenei regime and its nuclear ambitions—clashes sharply with the reality of the diplomatic landscape. Iran had expressed a willingness to remain at the negotiating table, signaling a readiness to concede points emerging from dialogue. 

False claim? What Venezuela is witnessing is not surrender but a tactical retreat

By Manolo De Los Santos  The early morning hours of January 3, 2026, marked an inflection point in Venezuela and Latin America’s centuries-long struggle for self-determination and independence. Operation Absolute Resolve, ordered by the Trump administration, constituted the most brutal and direct military assault on a sovereign state in the region in recent memory. In a shocking operation that left hundreds dead, President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores were illegally kidnapped from Venezuelan soil and transported to the United States, where they now face fabricated charges in a New York federal detention facility. In the two months since this act of war, a torrent of speculation has emerged from so-called experts and pundits across the political spectrum. This has followed three main lines: One . The operation’s success indicated treason at the highest levels of the Bolivarian Revolution. Two . Acting President Delcy Rodríguez and the remaining leadership have abandone...

The selective memory of a violent city: Uttam Nagar and the invisible victims of Delhi

By Sunil Kumar*  Hundreds of murders take place in Delhi every year, yet only a few incidents become topics of nationwide discussion. The question is: why does this happen? Today, the incident in Uttam Nagar has become the centre of national debate. A 26-year-old man, Tarun Kumar, was killed following a dispute that reportedly began after a balloon hit a small child. In several colonies of Delhi, slogans such as “Jai Shri Ram” and “Vande Mataram” are being raised while demanding the death penalty for Tarun’s killers. As a result, nearly 50,000 residents of Hastsal JJ Colony are now living in what resembles a state of confinement. 

The price of silence: Why Modi won’t follow Shastri, appeal for sacrifice

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey*  ​In 1965, as India grappled with war and a crippling food crisis, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri faced a United States that used wheat shipments under the PL-480 agreement as a lever to dictate Indian foreign policy. Shastri’s response remains legendary: he appealed to the nation to skip one meal a day. Millions of middle-class households complied, choosing temporary hunger over the sacrifice of national dignity. Today, India faces a modern equivalent in the energy sector, yet the leadership’s response stands in stark contrast to that era of self-reliance.

Love letters in a lifelong war: Babusha Kohli’s resistance in verse

By Ravi Ranjan*  “War does not determine who is right—only who is left.” Bertrand Russell’s words echo hauntingly in our times, and few contemporary Hindi poets embody this truth as profoundly as Babusha Kohli. Emerging from Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Kohli has carved a unique space in literature by weaving together tenderness, protest, and philosophy across poetry, prose, and cinema. Her work is not merely artistic expression—it is resistance, refuge, and a call for peace.