How Amit Shah's statement on Ambedkar reflects frustration of those uncomfortable with Dalit assertion, empowerment

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*

Dr. B.R. Ambedkar remains the liberator and emancipator of India’s oppressed communities. However, attempts to box him between two Brahmanical political parties betray a superficial and self-serving understanding of his legacy. The statement by Union Home Minister Amit Shah in the Rajya Sabha was highly objectionable, reflecting the frustration of those uncomfortable with Dalit assertion and empowerment.

Dr. Ambedkar’s philosophy revolved around the welfare of human beings rather than devotion to gods or goddesses. As the Buddha asserted, human philosophy must prioritize human welfare—a principle echoed in the teachings of Charvaka as well. Baba Saheb’s real struggle was not against the Congress or BJP per se but against the Brahmanical Social Order (BSO). This system was supported or opposed by individuals across political parties.

Constitution Making: A Collective Effort

The Constitution-making process was a landmark reconciliation effort in Indian society. Dr. Ambedkar and the Congress Party had differing views, but they collaborated to rebuild the nation. Jawaharlal Nehru, in particular, recognized the importance of this process. Interestingly, Dr. Syama Prasad Mookerjee, leader of the Bharatiya Jana Sangh, was also part of this effort. Despite their ideological differences, none of these leaders resorted to labeling each other anti-national or inferior. They debated vigorously in Parliament, leading to the creation of a Constitution that remains a pillar of India’s unity.

Today, selective references to historical events have damaged our polity. Congress, as a broad-based organization during the freedom struggle, naturally became a platform for diverse leaders and ideas. After independence, these leaders formed separate parties, becoming political rivals in a democratic framework.

Both Dr. Ambedkar and Dr. Mookerjee served in Nehru’s cabinet. When Mahatma Gandhi was assassinated in 1948, Mookerjee distanced himself from the Hindu Mahasabha but remained in the Cabinet. He only resigned in 1951 over the Nehru-Liaquat Pact, not under compulsion. Despite political differences, leaders like Nehru, Ambedkar, and Mookerjee shared mutual respect—a hallmark of a different, more respectful political era.

Ambedkar's Unfinished Fight

Dr. Ambedkar faced immense opposition during his career, particularly over the Hindu Code Bill, a progressive piece of legislation aimed at reforming Hindu personal laws. Prominent leaders like Dr. Rajendra Prasad, K.M. Munshi, Purushottam Das Tandon, and Syama Prasad Mookerjee fiercely opposed it. Even Sardar Patel leaned toward the opposition. Only Nehru and Ambedkar stood united in advocating for this reform.

Despite his contributions, Ambedkar faced political setbacks, losing Lok Sabha elections in North Bombay and Bhandara, with Congress ensuring his defeat. Other parties, including the Communist Party, Jana Sangh, and Hindu Mahasabha, also fielded candidates against him. While Congress historically downplayed Ambedkar’s legacy, he famously referred to it as the "original Brahmanical party of India." Were he alive today, one wonders what he would say about the BJP, which he might term the "Brahmin-Bania party."

Actions, Not Symbols

The debate over who honors Dr. Ambedkar better—Congress or BJP—is moot. The Bharat Ratna was not conferred on him by the BJP but by V.P. Singh, a leader vilified by both Congress and BJP. Singh also extended reservations to Neo-Buddhists, ensured the installation of Ambedkar’s portrait in Parliament, and declared Ambedkar Jayanti a national holiday. He worked tirelessly to preserve and spread Ambedkar’s ideas, often in collaboration with leaders like the late Ram Vilas Paswan.

Merely building grand memorials or statues of Dr. Ambedkar is not enough. To truly honor his legacy, political leaders must:

1. Implement land reforms and redistribute land to the marginalized.

2. Ensure free healthcare and education for all.

3. Halt the privatization of natural resources.

4. Fully implement reservations across all sectors.

Beyond the Constitution

Dr. Ambedkar’s legacy extends beyond his role in drafting the Constitution. He was a relentless critic of Brahmanical Hinduism, challenging its texts, gods, and practices. His 22 vows at Nagpur's Deekshabhoomi in 1956 called for a path of humanism inspired by the Buddha.

To uphold Ambedkar’s vision, we must stop confining him to mere rhetoric about the Constitution. Instead, we should focus on realizing his ideals: redistributing resources, providing free quality education, and ensuring inclusive governance that reflects India’s diversity.

The Path Forward

Dr. Ambedkar’s vision for India was one of progressive humanism, not regressive religious orthodoxy. His India would prioritize welfare, education, and healthcare, with leadership rooted in enlightenment, not division. It is time for the state to deliver welfare measures for Dalits, Adivasis, backward classes, and all marginalized communities, regardless of their religion or ethnicity. Only then can we create an inclusive and just society, true to the ideals of Dr. Ambedkar.

---

*Human rights defender

Comments

The golden crop: How turmeric is transforming women's lives in tribal India

By Vikas Meshram* When the lush green fields of turmeric sway in the tribal belt of southern Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, and Gujarat, it is not merely a spice crop — it is the golden glow of self-reliance. In villages where even basic spices once had to be bought from the market, the very soil today is yielding a prosperity that has transformed the lives of thousands of families. At the heart of this transformation is the initiative of Vaagdhara, which has linked turmeric with livelihoods, nutrition, and village self-governance — gram swaraj.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Authoritarian destruction of the public sphere in Ecuador: Trumpism in action?

By Pilar Troya Fernández The situation in Ecuador under Daniel Noboa's government is one of authoritarianism advancing on several fronts simultaneously to consolidate neoliberalism and total submission to the US international agenda. These are not isolated measures, but rather a coordinated strategy that combines job insecurity, the dismantling of the welfare state, unrestricted access to mining, the continuation of oil exploitation without environmental considerations, the centralization of power through the financial suffocation of local governments, and the systematic criminalization of all forms of opposition and popular organization.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Echoes of Vietnam and Chile: The devastating cost of the I-A Axis in Iran

By Ram Puniyani The recent joint military actions by Israel and the United States against Iran have been devastating. Like all wars, this conflict is brutal to its core, leaving a trail of human suffering in its wake. The stated pretext for this aggression—the brutality of the Ayatollah Khamenei regime and its nuclear ambitions—clashes sharply with the reality of the diplomatic landscape. Iran had expressed a willingness to remain at the negotiating table, signaling a readiness to concede points emerging from dialogue.

False claim? What Venezuela is witnessing is not surrender but a tactical retreat

By Manolo De Los Santos The early morning hours of January 3, 2026, marked an inflection point in Venezuela and Latin America’s centuries-long struggle for self-determination and independence. Operation Absolute Resolve, ordered by the Trump administration, constituted the most brutal and direct military assault on a sovereign state in the region in recent memory. In a shocking operation that left hundreds dead, President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores were illegally kidnapped from Venezuelan soil and transported to the United States, where they now face fabricated charges in a New York federal detention facility. In the two months since this act of war, a torrent of speculation has emerged from so-called experts and pundits across the political spectrum. This has followed three main lines: One . The operation’s success indicated treason at the highest levels of the Bolivarian Revolution. Two . Acting President Delcy Rodríguez and the remaining leadership have abandone...

The selective memory of a violent city: Uttam Nagar and the invisible victims of Delhi

By Sunil Kumar* Hundreds of murders take place in Delhi every year, yet only a few incidents become topics of nationwide discussion. The question is: why does this happen? Today, the incident in Uttam Nagar has become the centre of national debate. A 26-year-old man, Tarun Kumar, was killed following a dispute that reportedly began after a balloon hit a small child. In several colonies of Delhi, slogans such as “Jai Shri Ram” and “Vande Mataram” are being raised while demanding the death penalty for Tarun’s killers. As a result, nearly 50,000 residents of Hastsal JJ Colony are now living in what resembles a state of confinement.

The price of silence: Why Modi won’t follow Shastri, appeal for sacrifice

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey* In 1965, as India grappled with war and a crippling food crisis, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri faced a United States that used wheat shipments under the PL-480 agreement as a lever to dictate Indian foreign policy. Shastri’s response remains legendary: he appealed to the nation to skip one meal a day. Millions of middle-class households complied, choosing temporary hunger over the sacrifice of national dignity. Today, India faces a modern equivalent in the energy sector, yet the leadership’s response stands in stark contrast to that era of self-reliance.

Love letters in a lifelong war: Babusha Kohli’s resistance in verse

By Ravi Ranjan* “War does not determine who is right—only who is left.” Bertrand Russell’s words echo hauntingly in our times, and few contemporary Hindi poets embody this truth as profoundly as Babusha Kohli. Emerging from Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Kohli has carved a unique space in literature by weaving together tenderness, protest, and philosophy across poetry, prose, and cinema. Her work is not merely artistic expression—it is resistance, refuge, and a call for peace.

Search This Blog