Skip to main content

Marshal Zhukov's military achievements during World War II 'immortalized' in history

By Harsh Thakor*
Marshal Georgy Zhukov is widely regarded as one of the most exceptional generals of the conflict, and this year marked the 50th anniversary of his passing on June 18. His remarkable tenacity, courage, and strategic acumen are unmatched in military annals. 
Zhukov's journey from humble beginnings as a peasant boy to a prominent general during the Second World War exemplifies a true rags-to-riches story. He emerged as the Soviet Union's key military leader, instrumental in shaping pivotal moments throughout the war. 
Notably, Zhukov played a crucial role in saving Leningrad from Nazi capture in September 1941, orchestrated the defense of Moscow in October 1941, led the Red Army's advance on Berlin, and accepted Germany's unconditional surrender in May 1945. While he made tactical errors in some operations, his ability to navigate complex strategic scenarios set him apart. 
Geoffrey Roberts' biography, "Stalin's General," stands as the first comprehensive critical examination of Zhukov, drawing on independent sources to portray his life before and after the war. Although Roberts addresses the Soviet Union's significant achievements and its grave transgressions, he steadfastly refuses to shy away from condemning the regime's terror and repression. Yet, he asserts that force and terror were not the only elements that defined Zhukov’s life and the monumental events he witnessed. 
Zhukov's own memoirs reflect a historian’s clarity rather than that of a mere reminiscence. 

Early life

Born on December 2, 1896, in the peasant village of Strelkovka, Kaluga Province, Central Russia, Zhukov received a primary education until the age of 10. He later apprenticed as a cobbler in Moscow. In 1915, he joined a Tsarist cavalry regiment, where he honed his skills in using large mounted formations on the expansive Russian steppes. Notably, as a soldier, he captured a German officer while working as a spy before being injured by a mine, earning his second St. George's Cross. 
In 1918, Zhukov joined the newly established Soviet Red Guards, meeting Joseph Stalin during the Russian Civil War at Tsaritsyn. Both men were pivotal in defeating the right-wing White forces. The Soviet military purges eventually facilitated Zhukov's rise and that of fellow marshals. In June 1939, he commanded the 1st Soviet Mongolian Army, which achieved victory over the Japanese Kwantung Army. 

Zhukov and Stalin 

Zhukov's collaboration with Stalin significantly influenced the Soviet success against Hitler and the Nazis. He was a key architect in the outcomes of major battles during the Soviet-German conflict, including Leningrad, Moscow, Stalingrad, Kursk, and Berlin. 
In his memoirs, Zhukov credits Stalin with saving Moscow, acknowledging the "near impossible" achievement that resulted from Stalin's stringent oversight. 
Despite prioritizing the demoralization of Nazi forces, Zhukov was also committed to conserving and effectively utilizing the Red Army's resources during a time of limited availability.
As the Battle of Stalingrad approached, Stalin appointed Zhukov as Deputy Supreme Commander, tasking him with saving the city and preparing countermeasures against the enemy offensive. 
Throughout the war, the Red Army's operational doctrine evolved, often reflecting Zhukov's preference for encirclement tactics, a strategy he used successfully at Stalingrad in November 1942. 
Although he respected Stalin's leadership, Zhukov was not afraid to confront him during postwar tensions. When dismissed by Khrushchev, he maintained his dignity, expressing loyalty while denying any wrongdoing.

Role in World War II 

Zhukov demonstrated exceptional strategic foresight, undertaking meticulous preparations for combat. His capacity for both offensive and defensive operations was evident during the Soviet war games of January 1941. However, when Germany invaded in June 1941, early counter-offensives inadvertently exposed Soviet forces to encirclement, contributing to one of the Red Army's most devastating defeats. By year’s end, approximately four million Soviet soldiers had fallen, leading to heavy retreats. 
In July 1941, Zhukov was appointed to command a reserve army tasked with launching a significant counter-offensive in the Smolensk region. He successfully achieved the Red Army’s first large-scale offensive against German forces at Yelnya in August, reversing the momentum by recapturing substantial territory.
Zhukov's subsequent actions led to the salvation of Leningrad in September 1941 and a decisive counteroffensive outside Moscow in December that rolled back German forces and thwarted Hitler’s plans for a rapid conquest. The following summer, the Germans aimed to seize Soviet oilfields, setting the stage for the siege of Stalingrad. 
On the eve of Stalingrad, Zhukov executed a multi-faceted counteroffensive termed Operation Uranus, which encircled 300,000 Axis troops and inflicted heavy losses on German forces. This victory marked a turning point in the war, demonstrating Zhukov's effectiveness in command. 
Zhukov's strategic prowess continued throughout the war, culminating in a decisive role during the Battle of Kursk in July 1943, where German and Soviet forces clashed with devastating results for Germany. The subsequent liberation of Kiev and the successful execution of Operation Bagration further established Zhukov as a vital figure in advancing Soviet objectives through Eastern Europe.
In the spring of 1945, Zhukov was pivotal in the final assault on Berlin, culminating with the acceptance of Germany's unconditional surrender on May 9. His commanding presence during the victory parade in June 1945 underscored his significance in Soviet military history.

Post-war life

Following the war, Zhukov was unexpectedly removed from his position as commander-in-chief and assigned to a military command in Odessa. However, with Stalin’s death in March 1953, a political shift allowed for a resurgence in his career, as he supported Nikita Khrushchev's rise and participated in the elimination of the NKVD chief Beria. 
Despite his political endorsements, Zhukov faced further demotion, accused by Khrushchev of fostering a "cult of personality." During the 20th Party Congress in 1956, he became embroiled in disputes regarding military preparedness prior to the German invasion. 
Zhukov, while acknowledging potential flaws in Soviet strategy, defended the readiness of the Red Army. In the years following Khrushchev's ousting, Zhukov experienced a gradual rehabilitation, culminating in the publication of his memoirs, which sought to correct perceived inaccuracies about the war from both Soviet and German perspectives. His writings reflect a nuanced understanding of military history and strategy. 
Marshal Georgy Zhukov passed away on June 18, 1974, at the age of 77. His final resting place is in the Kremlin Wall, memorialized by his contemporaries as a figure who inseparably linked his life to that of his nation. His funeral garnered national attention, reminiscent of Stalin's memorial, and signified the emergence of a Zhukov cult in historical memory. 
---
*Freelance journalist

Comments

TRENDING

Stronger India–Russia partnership highlights a missed energy breakthrough

By N.S. Venkataraman*  The recent visit of Russian President Vladimir Putin to India was widely publicized across several countries and has attracted significant global attention. The warmth with which Mr. Putin was received by Prime Minister Narendra Modi was particularly noted, prompting policy planners worldwide to examine the implications of this cordial relationship for the global economy and political climate. India–Russia relations have stood on a strong foundation for decades and have consistently withstood geopolitical shifts. This is in marked contrast to India’s ties with the United States, which have experienced fluctuations under different U.S. administrations.

From natural farming to fair prices: Young entrepreneurs show a new path

By Bharat Dogra   There have been frequent debates on agro-business companies not showing adequate concern for the livelihoods of small farmers. Farmers’ unions have often protested—generally with good reason—that while they do not receive fair returns despite high risks and hard work, corporate interests that merely process the crops produced by farmers earn disproportionately high profits. Hence, there is a growing demand for alternative models of agro-business development that demonstrate genuine commitment to protecting farmer livelihoods.

The Vande Mataram debate and the politics of manufactured controversy

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The recent Vande Mataram debate in Parliament was never meant to foster genuine dialogue. Each political party spoke past the other, addressing its own constituency, ensuring that clips went viral rather than contributing to meaningful deliberation. The objective was clear: to construct a Hindutva narrative ahead of the Bengal elections. Predictably, the Lok Sabha will likely expunge the opposition’s “controversial” remarks while retaining blatant inaccuracies voiced by ministers and ruling-party members. The BJP has mastered the art of inserting distortions into parliamentary records to provide them with a veneer of historical legitimacy.

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

Thota Sitaramaiah: An internal pillar of an underground organisation

By Harsh Thakor*  Thota Sitaramaiah was regarded within his circles as an example of the many individuals whose work in various underground movements remained largely unknown to the wider public. While some leaders become visible through organisational roles or media attention, many others contribute quietly, without public recognition. Sitaramaiah was considered one such figure. He passed away on December 8, 2025, at the age of 65.

Epic war against caste system is constitutional responsibility of elected government

Edited by well-known Gujarat Dalit rights leader Martin Macwan, the book, “Bhed-Bharat: An Account of Injustice and Atrocities on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-18)” (available in English and Gujarati*) is a selection of news articles on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-2018) published by Dalit Shakti Prakashan, Ahmedabad. Preface to the book, in which Macwan seeks to answer key questions on why the book is needed today: *** The thought of compiling a book on atrocities on Dalits and thus present an overall Indian picture had occurred to me a long time ago. Absence of such a comprehensive picture is a major reason for a weak social and political consciousness among Dalits as well as non-Dalits. But gradually the idea took a different form. I found that lay readers don’t understand numbers and don’t like to read well-researched articles. The best way to reach out to them was storytelling. As I started writing in Gujarati and sharing the idea of the book with my friends, it occurred to me that while...

The cost of being Indian: How inequality and market logic redefine rights

By Vikas Gupta   We, the people of India, are engaged in a daily tryst—read: struggle—for basic human rights. For the seemingly well-to-do, the wish list includes constant water supply, clean air, safe roads, punctual public transportation, and crime-free neighbourhoods. For those further down the ladder, the struggle is starker: food that fills the stomach, water that doesn’t sicken, medicines that don’t kill, houses that don’t flood, habitats at safe distances from polluted streams or garbage piles, and exploitation-free environments in the public institutions they are compelled to navigate.

New RTI draft rules inspired by citizen-unfriendly, overtly bureaucratic approach

By Venkatesh Nayak* The Department of Personnel and Training , Government of India has invited comments on a new set of Draft Rules (available in English only) to implement The Right to Information Act, 2005 . The RTI Rules were last amended in 2012 after a long period of consultation with various stakeholders. The Government’s move to put the draft RTI Rules out for people’s comments and suggestions for change is a welcome continuation of the tradition of public consultation. Positive aspects of the Draft RTI Rules While 60-65% of the Draft RTI Rules repeat the content of the 2012 RTI Rules, some new aspects deserve appreciation as they clarify the manner of implementation of key provisions of the RTI Act. These are: Provisions for dealing with non-compliance of the orders and directives of the Central Information Commission (CIC) by public authorities- this was missing in the 2012 RTI Rules. Non-compliance is increasingly becoming a major problem- two of my non-compliance cases are...

Proposals for Babri Masjid, Ram Temple spark fears of polarisation before West Bengal polls

By A Representative   A political debate has emerged in West Bengal following recent announcements about plans for new religious structures in Murshidabad district, including a proposed mosque to be named Babri Masjid and a separate announcement by a BJP leader regarding the construction of a Ram temple in another location within Behrampur.