Skip to main content

Padyatris detained: Why's UP police feeling so insecure? Sandeep Pandey asks Yogi

Counterview Desk 

Well-known academic and Magsaysay award winning social activist Sandeep Pandey in an open letter to Uttar Pradesh chief minister Yogi Adityanath, alluding to a recent protest padyatra he and his colleagues had planned in support of the Azamgarh farmers' opposition to the international airport, has wondered: why, when their contingent was as small as about a dozen persons, his government was feeling so insecure as to send a huge police force to block it?
Accusing the UP police of resorting to illegal ways of violating the fundamental rights of freedom of speech and expression, assemble peaceably, form associations or unions, and move freely, Pandy, who is, general secretary, Socialist Party (India), said, "It is unclear why they have to resort to illegal ways of detaining people, snatching their mobile phones, not allowing pictures to be taken or talk to media while they are in detention without any case being lodged against the detainees."

Text:

We were to take out a padyatra during 24-27 December, 2022 from Varanasi to Manduri, Azamgarh in support of a farmers’ movement going on at Manduri since 13 October against a proposed international airport which would involve taking over of 670 acres of land belonging to 8 villages uprooting close to ten thousand people. This padyatra was to mark the completion of 75 days of the daily sit-in observed by mainly women at Khiriya Bagh, an open space in Manduri.
I and the leader of the movement in Azamgarh, my friend Rajeev Yadav, were in touch with the intelligence personnel of UP police to inform them about all details. The padyatra was to have 10-15 people walking for 4 days, distributing pamphlets and not holding any big meeting on the way. The padyatra was to terminate in the daily meeting at Manduri on 27 December. We assumed that since the movement was being allowed to take place, the padyatra will also proceed unhindered. Earlier 13 farmers and activists from Unnao, Barabanki, Kanpur and Lucknow had travelled in two vehicles from Kanpur to Azamgarh.
After boarding the train from Lucknow on 23 December late evening within half an hour a UP police personnel arrived in the coach in which 5 of us were travelling. Soon it became clear that he was there to keep a watch on us and to inform his seniors about our location. As was expected, a large posse of police was waiting for us at the Varanasi Cantonment Railway station early morning. We were taken to the Sigra police station and then to the police lines. It was clear that the UP government did not want this padyatra to take place. I don’t understand why does your government feel insecure with a padyatra of small number of people who would have just distributed about ten thousand pamphlets on the way?
While at the police lines the police did not want us to use our mobiles phones, they made an attempt to snatch the phone of my colleague that I was using and relented only when I threatened that I’ll get involved in physical tussle if they pursued. Friends had come to meet us and were waiting outside but the police would not let us meet them. They did not even allow our breakfast to be let in which was brought by a friend Ranju. I had to then go on a sit in inside the police lines. I moved from the sofa in the room to the ground. My 5 colleagues did likewise. I also communicated that I will not talk to any senior police officers until my friends who had arrived outside would be allowed to come in to meet us. Finally, when Assistant Commissioner of Police Dr Atul Anjan Tripathi arrived he allowed my friends in on the condition that they will not take any photographs inside. Additional Commissioner of Police Rakesh Kumar Pandey also arrived soon. Meanwhile, I noticed that my 5 colleagues who had come with me were separated from me and the pamphlets, banner and placards that we had bought were stolen. I complained about this to Additional CP. He said there was no room to seat my 5 friends. I moved to the ground and said that if some of us sit on ground space can be created. When he realized I was going on a sit-in again he ordered my 5 colleagues to be brought in and promised to return our publicity material when we left. He wanted to send us to Azamgarh. With his permission we conducted a meeting with friends from Varanasi and Azamgarh who had come to see us and decided that we’ll go to Lucknow and come to Azamgarh only on the 75th day of the movement, 26 December.
Seven of us including Amit Maurya, Sant Ram from Barabanki, Ram Shankar and Ramshankar from Unnao, Shyam Bihari from Hardoi and Adil Ansari from Kannauj were sent back in a police vehicle to Lucknow around noon time. Bhagwan Awaghade who had arrived from Satara, Maharashtra to participate in the padyatra decided to accompany Rajeev Yadav to Azamgarh.
ACP who had promised us that we would be allowed to give interviews and our pictures taken once we were outside the police lines campus fooled us by asking the driver not to stop our vehicle as it left the campus.
Actions of UP government are not going to reflect positively in attempt to seek foreign and national investments for business
Rajeev had hardly reached 22 kms outside Varanasi in a vehicle driven by his brother Vinod Yadav, when at about 2:30 pm they were confronted by a group of plainclothesmen in an unnumbered vehicle claiming to be from Special Task Force. They thrashed Rajeev and Vinod and forced them to sit in their vehicle, snatched the vehicle keys from Vinod’s hand and sped away in the direction to Varanasi but to return to go to Azamgarh after a while. For one hour they grilled Rajeev on the question of his involvement in the movement against international airport, about inviting leaders like Medha Patkar and Rakesh Tikait to the movement, about my organizing the padyatra, about the source of his funds, etc. Meanwhile I had sent messages to senior police officers including Additional Director General of Police, Ram Kumar about Rajeev and Vinod’s kidnapping by unidentified men. A person Vinod Dubey, among the kidnappers, was communicating with Superintendent of Police, Azamgarh. Finally they brought Rajeev and Vinod to Kandhrapur police station near the movement spot in Manduri and then took them to a District court to sign a self-bond so that they could be released. Apparently, a case was filed against them but we don’t know for what offense.
Your government claims that law and order situation has improved in its rule. However, the fact is that police has become repressive. It is unclear why they have to resort to illegal ways of detaining people, snatching their mobile phones, not allowing pictures to be taken or talk to media while they are in detention without any case being lodged against the detainees. If the Azamgarh police wanted to question Rajeev they could have done that in a straightforward manner by inviting Rajeev for a dialogue. What was the need of involving Crime branch to stage a kidnapping and treat the leader of a movement as criminal while themselves acting as hoodlums? Police is obviously acting unprofessionally and resorting to illegal ways violating our constitutional fundamental rights under Article 19 (a) to freedom of speech and expression, (b) to assemble peaceably, (c) to form associations or unions, and (d) to move freely throughout the territory of India.
Please ensure that UP police acts in a professional manner and doesn’t stoop to illegal methods of operation. Such actions by your police and government are obviously not going to reflect positively in your attempt to seek foreign and national investments by business corporations.

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

  By Rajiv Shah   This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.

Love letters in a lifelong war: Babusha Kohli’s resistance in verse

By Ravi Ranjan*  “War does not determine who is right—only who is left.” Bertrand Russell’s words echo hauntingly in our times, and few contemporary Hindi poets embody this truth as profoundly as Babusha Kohli. Emerging from Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Kohli has carved a unique space in literature by weaving together tenderness, protest, and philosophy across poetry, prose, and cinema. Her work is not merely artistic expression—it is resistance, refuge, and a call for peace.

The golden crop: How turmeric is transforming women's lives in tribal India

By Vikas Meshram*   When the lush green fields of turmeric sway in the tribal belt of southern Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, and Gujarat, it is not merely a spice crop — it is the golden glow of self-reliance. In villages where even basic spices once had to be bought from the market, the very soil today is yielding a prosperity that has transformed the lives of thousands of families. At the heart of this transformation is the initiative of Vaagdhara, which has linked turmeric with livelihoods, nutrition, and village self-governance — gram swaraj.

Authoritarian destruction of the public sphere in Ecuador: Trumpism in action?

By Pilar Troya Fernández  The situation in Ecuador under Daniel Noboa's government is one of authoritarianism advancing on several fronts simultaneously to consolidate neoliberalism and total submission to the US international agenda. These are not isolated measures, but rather a coordinated strategy that combines job insecurity, the dismantling of the welfare state, unrestricted access to mining, the continuation of oil exploitation without environmental considerations, the centralization of power through the financial suffocation of local governments, and the systematic criminalization of all forms of opposition and popular organization.

Echoes of Vietnam and Chile: The devastating cost of the I-A Axis in Iran

​ By Ram Puniyani  ​The recent joint military actions by Israel and the United States against Iran have been devastating. Like all wars, this conflict is brutal to its core, leaving a trail of human suffering in its wake. The stated pretext for this aggression—the brutality of the Ayatollah Khamenei regime and its nuclear ambitions—clashes sharply with the reality of the diplomatic landscape. Iran had expressed a willingness to remain at the negotiating table, signaling a readiness to concede points emerging from dialogue. 

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

False claim? What Venezuela is witnessing is not surrender but a tactical retreat

By Manolo De Los Santos  The early morning hours of January 3, 2026, marked an inflection point in Venezuela and Latin America’s centuries-long struggle for self-determination and independence. Operation Absolute Resolve, ordered by the Trump administration, constituted the most brutal and direct military assault on a sovereign state in the region in recent memory. In a shocking operation that left hundreds dead, President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores were illegally kidnapped from Venezuelan soil and transported to the United States, where they now face fabricated charges in a New York federal detention facility. In the two months since this act of war, a torrent of speculation has emerged from so-called experts and pundits across the political spectrum. This has followed three main lines: One . The operation’s success indicated treason at the highest levels of the Bolivarian Revolution. Two . Acting President Delcy Rodríguez and the remaining leadership have abandone...

The price of silence: Why Modi won’t follow Shastri, appeal for sacrifice

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey*  ​In 1965, as India grappled with war and a crippling food crisis, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri faced a United States that used wheat shipments under the PL-480 agreement as a lever to dictate Indian foreign policy. Shastri’s response remains legendary: he appealed to the nation to skip one meal a day. Millions of middle-class households complied, choosing temporary hunger over the sacrifice of national dignity. Today, India faces a modern equivalent in the energy sector, yet the leadership’s response stands in stark contrast to that era of self-reliance.