Skip to main content

GN Saibaba, others called new generation freedom fighters, victims of state terror

By A Representative 

A Campaign Against State Repression (CASR) meeting on 28th October at the Gandhi Peace foundation on, ‘Dangerous Brain: Saibaba and Others', held to scrutinise the Supreme Court judgement suspending Bombay High Court's acquittal order of Prof GN Saibaba, Hem Mishra, Prashant Rahi, Vijay Tirki and Mahesh Tikri, has demanded that the Apex Court should uphold the Bombay High Court’s order granting acquittal to Saibaba and others.
Seeking compensation to family of Pandu Narote, CASR sought initiation inquiry into the custodial death of Narote and hold the officials responsible. Other demands put forward by CASR -- which is a network of several civil rights groups -- included repeal the anti-terror law, Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) and release all political prisoners.
Addressing meeting, senior advocate Colin Golsalves talked about the two judgements on GN Saibaba and Umar Khalid, explaining how the Indian courts are giving judgements politically and not legally. He said that no court has the right to reject acquittal without quashing the order.
On Umar Khalid's case, he said that he has been booked for making provocative speech. But in the Rangarajan case, it has been established that unless violence is being done, any speech even against government is not a crime. Umar Khalid was arrested for Delhi riots, but the MP and MLA who instigated violence in Delhi riots are free, he added.
He called who are in jail are the “new generation freedom fighters”, underlining, “We are in a new emergency which is more dangerous than Indira Gandhi’s. The judgements of Supreme Court prove this. Today the biggest terrorist force in our country is the government itself.”
Delhi University Professor Apoorvanand said that the Constitution orders that it is the responsibility of the state to ensure the freedom of all citizens. But it is the first time that the SC reversed an order in a case where the accused has been acquitted.
Citing the case of Jyoti Jagtap, he said that she has been denied bail because she criticized the government through their songs, means that there is no space in this democracy for criticism of the government. The same is true of Umar Khalid. All these cases must be seen in continuity.
In the Bhima Koregaon case, too, he said, the two Hindutva leaders accused were not arrested and instead activists were attacked. In the CAA-NRC case the duty of the police was to find out who were the writers and who planned the riots but instead the Delhi police arrested those who were involved in the anti CAA-NRC protest.
He pointed out that on 28th October, the Prime Minister said that we have to end all kinds of Naxalism, be it Naxalism of gun or of pen. Today we need to realise that the urban Naxal conspiracy of the government is not only against the jailed people but against all the people of the nation for whom these people are raising their voice. It is our responsibility is to make this message reach the masses, he added.
Scholar and activist Sharjeel Usmani said that the best of people of the country are in jail today. GN Saibaba is in jail because he stood against the Operation Green Hunt. Many press conferences have been held for him and most people try to awake emotions by talking about his health but the matter is not about is ill health or about the slogan "long live revolution" but this regime is actually against all those who speak.
Muslims are permanent minority in this country but apart from them there is another minority, i.e., the people who are conscious and critical of the state’s actions, he said. The rule of the majority by suppressing the minority is not democracy but hooliganism. We must keep on fighting.
Delhi University Professor Saroj Giri talked about the arrest of Hany Babu, Anand Teltumbde, Arun Ferreira, Siddiqui Kappan etc. He said that we must see it as a pattern this pattern is not dependent on what Supreme Court bench or who the CJI is but it depends on the state machinery including the security apparatus like NIA.
Muslims are permanent minority, but there is another minority, i.e., the people who are critical of the state’s actions
Referring to the case of Saibaba, he explained how the state machinery works. It is not about any party or organisation, but the whole state character. Even if any other government wins the election, this crackdown will continue. We cannot understand the whole picture if we see the ruling BJP only.
Delhi University Professor Manoranjan Mohanty was not able to attend the programme physically, but he sent his message. It said, according to the SC judges, the brain seems more dangerous to the rulers than actual actions. This judgement goes to encounter the basic practices and laws that have taken human civilization from the stage of oppression to that of better human conditions.
The message added, in the past also, rulers have labelled such people as anti-nationals, terrorists, rebels. Now it has become general scenario by the politicians, state agencies and even the Judiciary. He appealed to all democratic forces to join hands against this state repression.
Delhi University Professor Laxman Yadav quoted the last letter of Bhagat Singh which said that every drop of the blood was for the revolution. But today, in the era of Amrit Mahotsav, the word "revolution" is enough for someone to go to jail.
He said that it is difficult for those and their families who are in jail but more than their private loss, this is a bigger loss to the society and to the nation. Professors lawyers, artists etc. are behind jail and those who must be in jail are ruling us, they are getting promotion so that they can give more hate speeches.
He said that it is not only about BJP but about the tendency which oppresses workers, farmers, Dalit, minorities and Adivasis. There is no use of good judges, good students or good people, in general, if they do not speak against injustice. He added, yesterday those who were in jail are our leaders of today. Those who are in jail today are fighting on behalf of all the people.
Labour rights activist Nodeep Kaur said that the activists are being labelled as Maoists or Naxalites, so we must talk about who Maoists are. Maoists are people who started their struggle on some basic structural questions, and rather than addressing such fundamental questions, the state is using “Maoist” tag to attack all who are critical of the state. She said that there is no democracy left today.
She added, all the four pillars of democracy have fallen. The state is waging a war against people. Talking about Chief Justice of India UU Lalit, she added, he fought in favour of all those who have been accused of murder and rioting. We have to overthrow this system, only then we can establish an equitable society.

Comments

TRENDING

Grueling summer ahead: Cuttack’s alarming health trends and what they mean for Odisha

By Sudhansu R Das  The preparation to face the summer should begin early in Odisha. People in the state endure long, grueling summer months starting from mid-February and extending until the end of October. This prolonged heat adversely affects productivity, causes deaths and diseases, and impacts agriculture, tourism and the unorganized sector. The social, economic and cultural life of the state remains severely disrupted during the peak heat months.

Stronger India–Russia partnership highlights a missed energy breakthrough

By N.S. Venkataraman*  The recent visit of Russian President Vladimir Putin to India was widely publicized across several countries and has attracted significant global attention. The warmth with which Mr. Putin was received by Prime Minister Narendra Modi was particularly noted, prompting policy planners worldwide to examine the implications of this cordial relationship for the global economy and political climate. India–Russia relations have stood on a strong foundation for decades and have consistently withstood geopolitical shifts. This is in marked contrast to India’s ties with the United States, which have experienced fluctuations under different U.S. administrations.

From natural farming to fair prices: Young entrepreneurs show a new path

By Bharat Dogra   There have been frequent debates on agro-business companies not showing adequate concern for the livelihoods of small farmers. Farmers’ unions have often protested—generally with good reason—that while they do not receive fair returns despite high risks and hard work, corporate interests that merely process the crops produced by farmers earn disproportionately high profits. Hence, there is a growing demand for alternative models of agro-business development that demonstrate genuine commitment to protecting farmer livelihoods.

The Vande Mataram debate and the politics of manufactured controversy

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The recent Vande Mataram debate in Parliament was never meant to foster genuine dialogue. Each political party spoke past the other, addressing its own constituency, ensuring that clips went viral rather than contributing to meaningful deliberation. The objective was clear: to construct a Hindutva narrative ahead of the Bengal elections. Predictably, the Lok Sabha will likely expunge the opposition’s “controversial” remarks while retaining blatant inaccuracies voiced by ministers and ruling-party members. The BJP has mastered the art of inserting distortions into parliamentary records to provide them with a veneer of historical legitimacy.

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

The cost of being Indian: How inequality and market logic redefine rights

By Vikas Gupta   We, the people of India, are engaged in a daily tryst—read: struggle—for basic human rights. For the seemingly well-to-do, the wish list includes constant water supply, clean air, safe roads, punctual public transportation, and crime-free neighbourhoods. For those further down the ladder, the struggle is starker: food that fills the stomach, water that doesn’t sicken, medicines that don’t kill, houses that don’t flood, habitats at safe distances from polluted streams or garbage piles, and exploitation-free environments in the public institutions they are compelled to navigate.

Why India must urgently strengthen its policies for an ageing population

By Bharat Dogra   A quiet but far-reaching demographic transformation is reshaping much of the world. As life expectancy rises and birth rates fall, societies are witnessing a rapid increase in the proportion of older people. This shift has profound implications for public policy, and the need to strengthen frameworks for healthy and secure ageing has never been more urgent. India is among the countries where these pressures will intensify most sharply in the coming decades.

Thota Sitaramaiah: An internal pillar of an underground organisation

By Harsh Thakor*  Thota Sitaramaiah was regarded within his circles as an example of the many individuals whose work in various underground movements remained largely unknown to the wider public. While some leaders become visible through organisational roles or media attention, many others contribute quietly, without public recognition. Sitaramaiah was considered one such figure. He passed away on December 8, 2025, at the age of 65.

Proposals for Babri Masjid, Ram Temple spark fears of polarisation before West Bengal polls

By A Representative   A political debate has emerged in West Bengal following recent announcements about plans for new religious structures in Murshidabad district, including a proposed mosque to be named Babri Masjid and a separate announcement by a BJP leader regarding the construction of a Ram temple in another location within Behrampur.