Skip to main content

Apex Court Saibaba order supports move to 'kill' brains that think, question, resist

Counterview Desk 

The civil rights network Campaign Against State Repression (CASR), taking strong exception to the Supreme Court order to suspend the acquittal of Prof GN Saibaba and others in Gadchiroli case pertaining to alleged ‘Maoist link’, has said that it an attempt to kill so-called “dangerous brain” because the state wants to kill them and their brains that think, question and resist.
In a statement,CASR says, “They want to kill every brain, gag every mouth and jail every being who questions the brutal exploitation of people by the big corporates. They want to keep in jail every voice that foisted the state’s attempt to militarily loot the people of their resources and livelihood through Operation Green-Hunt, which Saibaba and others jailed in Gadchiroli case and Bhima Koregaon case have strongly rresisted”
It adds, "They want to do so to continue the exploitation of people and their resources in far off central Indian regions, in North Eastern states, Kashmir and everywhere. This is not just an attack on Saibaba and others but a clear sign of continuing and ever sharpening attack on all involved in the struggle for a democratic society.”

Text:

“Our system is scared of those (people) who raise their voice against its injustice. It (system) is scared of the people’s voice. Students and activists, who expose failures of governments, are viewed as a threat by the establishment and the state wants to destroy this threat.” -- Hem Mishra student and cultural activist
Ninety percent disabled, wheelchair bound professor GN Saibaba, Hem Mishra, Prashant Rahi, Mahesh Tirki and Vijay Tirki were granted acquittal by Nagpur Bench of Bombay High court on 14th October 2022 on the grounds of irregular sanction. The High Court noted that in the absence of proper and legal sanction by appointed sanctioning authority i.e., the Central Government, the trial in the case is null and void, as the trial court didn’t have lawful authority to prosecute in absence of the proper sanction under section 45 (I) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act. The order sent a wave of joy as Saibaba and others have been incarcerated falsely for over 8 years now with little to nothing relief, even in basic amenities like health care. But as soon as the order came, the Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, acting at the behest of the Brahmanical Hindutva fascist government at the Centre and State, made oral plea in the Supreme Court before the bench of Justice DY Chandrachud to stay the release of Saibaba and others as they are a perceived threat to national security. The SC noted that it cannot stay the acquittal order and turned down the plea. Not much later, when the country and the world was yet to know the relieving news of their acquittal, the Brahmanical Hindutva fascist state made the higher echelons of Judiciary constitute a “Extraordinary Special sitting” by an usually unordinary bench of Justice MR Shah and Bela M Trivedi to hear the Special Leave Petition against the acquittal order on the very next day, 15th October 2022. The question has been raised by various democratic lawyers, jurists and conscious people on the hurriedness and nature of this special sitting. It is also not very surprising as presiding Judge happens to be a supporter of Narendra Modi who has, not very long ago, proclaimed Modi as the “beloved, vibrant and visionary leader”. This very well points out the possible outcome, the hearing of 15th October was set to come out with.
They want to kill every brain, gag every mouth and jail every being who questions the brutal exploitation of people by the big corporates
The judges of SC not paying heed to the reasoning of the High Court in granting acquittal (absence of mandatory legal sanction from appointed legal authority under section 45 (I) of UAPA and principle laid down by Apex Court in Baji Nath Prasad Tripathi vs State of Bhopal) , instead kept dwelling on the issue of merit and the notion of perceived threat to national security. Justice MR Shah, tuning in with SG Tushar Mehta, noted that “in cases of terrorist and Maoist activity, brain is more dangerous and direct involvement is not necessary”, justifying the state’s dangerous narrative of “urban Naxals” to pave way for repression on democratic rights movement. The court didn’t even accept the humanitarian appeal of granting bail to GN Saibaba, who has severe ailments and is 90 percent disabled and suspended the Acquittal order without any basic relief to Saibaba and others, leaving the councils of Saibaba and others with four weeks time to plead their case.
While we look at this case, we need to see the previous practice of the state including the judiciary in their utter disregard to life and personal liberty of the political prisoners. Father Stan Swamy was constantly denied basic amenities like a sipper and medical care by the authorities and the delay by Courts in intervening, which ultimately led to death of our dear father. The same case was repeated with Saibaba’s co-accused Pandu Narote, who was denied medical care by state and died later as a prisoner. Recent death of Kashmiri political prisoner Altaf Ahmad Shah, ailing with cancer, was caused due to deliberate medical negligence in providing necessary care. The list is long to even name.
The state has adopted this vicious modus operandi to silence its critics by killing them one way or the other. Suspension of Saibaba and others’ acquittal order is one such attempt to kill their “dangerous brain”. Same goes for Atiqur Rahman in Hathras case, Gautam Navlakha (diagnosed with cancer), Vernon Gonsalves and Hany Babu in Bhima Koregaon case; because the state wants to kill them and their brains that think, that question and that resists. They want to kill every brain, gag every mouth and jail every being who questions the brutal exploitation of people by the big corporates. They want to keep in jail every voice that foisted the state’s attempt to militarily loot the people of their resources and livelihood through Operation Green-Hunt, which Saibaba and others jailed in Gadchiroli case and Bhima Koregaon case have strongly resisted. They want to do so to continue the exploitation of people and their resources in far off central Indian regions, in North Eastern states, Kashmir and everywhere. This is not just an attack on Saibaba and others but a clear sign of continuing and ever sharpening attack on all involved in the struggle for a democratic society.
We call upon all the democratic, progressive, pro-people, secular and conscious people to resist this blatant attack on democratic right and right to life and personal liberty; stand shoulder to shoulder with Saibaba, Hem, Prashant, Vijay and Mahesh; Demand to uphold their acquittal and grant them immediate, unconditional release; and hold the state responsible for the custodial Mmurder of Pandu Narote.

DEMANDS:
  • Release GN Saibaba, Hem Mishra, Parshant Rahi, Mahesh Tirki, Vijay Tirki immediately and unconditionally
  • Uphold the Bombay High Court’s order granting acquittal GN Saibaba and others.
  • Grant compensation to Pandu Narote's family.
  • Repeal UAPA and all other draconian laws.
  • Release all political prisoners.
---
*AISA, AISF, APCR, Bhim Army, Bigul Mazdoor Dasta, BSCEM, CEM, CRPP, CTF, Disha, DISSC, DSU, DTF, IAPL, IFTU, IMK, Karnataka Janashakti, Lokpaksh, LSI, Mazdoor Adhikar Sangathan, Mazdoor Patrika, Mehnatkash Mahila Sangathan, Morcha Patrika, NAPM, NBS, NCHRO, Nowruz, NTUI, PDSU, People’s Watch, Rihai Manch, Samajwadi Janparishad, Satyashodhak Sangh, SFI, United Against Hate, WSS)

Comments

TRENDING

Grueling summer ahead: Cuttack’s alarming health trends and what they mean for Odisha

By Sudhansu R Das  The preparation to face the summer should begin early in Odisha. People in the state endure long, grueling summer months starting from mid-February and extending until the end of October. This prolonged heat adversely affects productivity, causes deaths and diseases, and impacts agriculture, tourism and the unorganized sector. The social, economic and cultural life of the state remains severely disrupted during the peak heat months.

Stronger India–Russia partnership highlights a missed energy breakthrough

By N.S. Venkataraman*  The recent visit of Russian President Vladimir Putin to India was widely publicized across several countries and has attracted significant global attention. The warmth with which Mr. Putin was received by Prime Minister Narendra Modi was particularly noted, prompting policy planners worldwide to examine the implications of this cordial relationship for the global economy and political climate. India–Russia relations have stood on a strong foundation for decades and have consistently withstood geopolitical shifts. This is in marked contrast to India’s ties with the United States, which have experienced fluctuations under different U.S. administrations.

From natural farming to fair prices: Young entrepreneurs show a new path

By Bharat Dogra   There have been frequent debates on agro-business companies not showing adequate concern for the livelihoods of small farmers. Farmers’ unions have often protested—generally with good reason—that while they do not receive fair returns despite high risks and hard work, corporate interests that merely process the crops produced by farmers earn disproportionately high profits. Hence, there is a growing demand for alternative models of agro-business development that demonstrate genuine commitment to protecting farmer livelihoods.

The Vande Mataram debate and the politics of manufactured controversy

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The recent Vande Mataram debate in Parliament was never meant to foster genuine dialogue. Each political party spoke past the other, addressing its own constituency, ensuring that clips went viral rather than contributing to meaningful deliberation. The objective was clear: to construct a Hindutva narrative ahead of the Bengal elections. Predictably, the Lok Sabha will likely expunge the opposition’s “controversial” remarks while retaining blatant inaccuracies voiced by ministers and ruling-party members. The BJP has mastered the art of inserting distortions into parliamentary records to provide them with a veneer of historical legitimacy.

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

The cost of being Indian: How inequality and market logic redefine rights

By Vikas Gupta   We, the people of India, are engaged in a daily tryst—read: struggle—for basic human rights. For the seemingly well-to-do, the wish list includes constant water supply, clean air, safe roads, punctual public transportation, and crime-free neighbourhoods. For those further down the ladder, the struggle is starker: food that fills the stomach, water that doesn’t sicken, medicines that don’t kill, houses that don’t flood, habitats at safe distances from polluted streams or garbage piles, and exploitation-free environments in the public institutions they are compelled to navigate.

Why India must urgently strengthen its policies for an ageing population

By Bharat Dogra   A quiet but far-reaching demographic transformation is reshaping much of the world. As life expectancy rises and birth rates fall, societies are witnessing a rapid increase in the proportion of older people. This shift has profound implications for public policy, and the need to strengthen frameworks for healthy and secure ageing has never been more urgent. India is among the countries where these pressures will intensify most sharply in the coming decades.

Thota Sitaramaiah: An internal pillar of an underground organisation

By Harsh Thakor*  Thota Sitaramaiah was regarded within his circles as an example of the many individuals whose work in various underground movements remained largely unknown to the wider public. While some leaders become visible through organisational roles or media attention, many others contribute quietly, without public recognition. Sitaramaiah was considered one such figure. He passed away on December 8, 2025, at the age of 65.

Proposals for Babri Masjid, Ram Temple spark fears of polarisation before West Bengal polls

By A Representative   A political debate has emerged in West Bengal following recent announcements about plans for new religious structures in Murshidabad district, including a proposed mosque to be named Babri Masjid and a separate announcement by a BJP leader regarding the construction of a Ram temple in another location within Behrampur.