Three top Modi ministers had "virtually no role to play" in the decision to raise Narmada dam height: NBA

By A Representative
Top social activist, Narmada Bachao Andolan’s Medha Patkar, fighting against the Narmada dam for decades, has alleged that Prime Minister Narendra Modi “influenced” the Narmada Control Authority (NCA) “politically” to raise the Narmada dam’s height. She said, she was “shocked” that the decision of the NCA, the multi-state body authorized for all the decisions on the Narmada project, was taken “bypassing the three concerned Union ministers -- Uma Bharti (water resources), Thavaar Chand Gehlot (social justice and empowerment) and Prakash Javdekar (environment), all from Madhya Pradesh.”
Pointing out that these leaders “had virtually no role in decision making”, the NBA leader suggested to newspersons in Delhi, this became clear during their meeting of NBA representatives. “Uma Bharti directed NCA officials look into some of the issues pointed out by the NBA and review all the decisions in a participatory manner. Gehlot was wrongly briefed by officials that the recent decision was in compliance with the Supreme Court judgment, while the reality is diametrically opposite”, an NBA statement said.

Uma Bharati

The NBA’s two-day “chetavni dharna” came to an end at Jantar Mantar in New Delhi saw prominent leaders of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), the CPI-M, prominent lawyers, intellectuals and activists participating. “All of them warned the Prime Minister and the NDA government to undertake a serious review of the illegal decision to raise the height of the dam”, the NBA said, adding, the cost of the Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP), of whose the dam was the most important component, has already been estimated at Rs 90,000 crore, even as submerging of 2.5 lakh people in the valley.
“In the name of Kutch and Saurashtra, Gujarat plans to dole out lakhs of hectares of command area land and water to the corporates and industries”, the statement said, adding, “A team of members of Parliament and distinguished citizens would visit the valley very soon, mostly before the beginning of the monsoon session, to raise the issues both within the country and also at every national fora.”
Talking with media, Yogendra Yadav of AAP condemned the “fast-track clearance approach of the Modi government in all matters and attempt to quell the voice of people's movements, which are actually trying to raise real people's issues in the country and challenge undemocratic decisions, as also loot of exchequer by massive corruption and corporate pandering”.

Javadekar

Yadav pointed out that the decision on the dam “indicative of the approach of Modi, which he would like to continue for five years. This means decisions would be towards destroying environment, suppressing the legitimate rights and voices of people.” He said the decision to raise the dam has been taken against the backdrop of Rs 1,000 crore judicial inquiry into resettlement and rehabilitation (R&R) corruption in Madhya Pradesh.
National Campaign for People's Right to Information’s (NCPRI’s) Nikhil Dey condemned those ministers who call themselves deshbhakts but actually work against the interests of the people; “if acche din would come then it will for few people at the cost of bure din of millions of poor people”, he said, adding, “Time is not far away when they will rise against this tyranny.” Brinda Karat of the CPI-M challenged the “arbitrary and anti people” decisions of Modi.
Trade Union leader Gautam Mody supported the “struggle” and called for coming together of farmers, workers and industrial labour to challenge the corporate agenda and the time has come when every people's movement in the country have to start talking to each other1 and understand the deep rooted inter-linkages of the issues and tyranny of the political class.
In a symbolic move, Aam Aadmi Party leader Arvind Kejriwal and top Supreme Court lawyer Prashant Bhushan arrived at the protest. Kejriwal "expressed full solidarity with the struggle and promised that their party would raise the issues both inside the Parliament and also across the country”, the NBA statement said.

Comments

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

By Rajiv Shah This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.

Love letters in a lifelong war: Babusha Kohli’s resistance in verse

By Ravi Ranjan* “War does not determine who is right—only who is left.” Bertrand Russell’s words echo hauntingly in our times, and few contemporary Hindi poets embody this truth as profoundly as Babusha Kohli. Emerging from Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Kohli has carved a unique space in literature by weaving together tenderness, protest, and philosophy across poetry, prose, and cinema. Her work is not merely artistic expression—it is resistance, refuge, and a call for peace.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Asbestos contamination in children’s products highlights global oversight gaps

By A Representative A commentary published by the International Ban Asbestos Secretariat (IBAS) has drawn attention to the challenges governments face in responding effectively to global public-health risks. In an article written by Laurie Kazan-Allen and published on March 5, 2026, the author examines how the discovery of asbestos contamination in children’s play products has raised questions about regulatory oversight and international product safety. The article opens by reflecting on lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that governments in several countries were slow to respond to early warning signs of the crisis. Referring to the experience of the United Kingdom, the author writes that delays in implementing protective measures contributed to “232,112 recorded deaths and over a million people suffering from long Covid.” The commentary uses this example to illustrate what it describes as the dangers of underestimating emerging threats. Attention then turns...

Echoes of Vietnam and Chile: The devastating cost of the I-A Axis in Iran

By Ram Puniyani The recent joint military actions by Israel and the United States against Iran have been devastating. Like all wars, this conflict is brutal to its core, leaving a trail of human suffering in its wake. The stated pretext for this aggression—the brutality of the Ayatollah Khamenei regime and its nuclear ambitions—clashes sharply with the reality of the diplomatic landscape. Iran had expressed a willingness to remain at the negotiating table, signaling a readiness to concede points emerging from dialogue.

Authoritarian destruction of the public sphere in Ecuador: Trumpism in action?

By Pilar Troya Fernández The situation in Ecuador under Daniel Noboa's government is one of authoritarianism advancing on several fronts simultaneously to consolidate neoliberalism and total submission to the US international agenda. These are not isolated measures, but rather a coordinated strategy that combines job insecurity, the dismantling of the welfare state, unrestricted access to mining, the continuation of oil exploitation without environmental considerations, the centralization of power through the financial suffocation of local governments, and the systematic criminalization of all forms of opposition and popular organization.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

The kitchen as prison: A feminist elegy for domestic slavery

By Garima Srivastava* Kumar Ambuj stands as one of the most incisive voices in contemporary Hindi poetry. His work, stripped of ornamentation, speaks directly to the lived realities of India’s marginalized—women, the rural poor, and those crushed under invisible forms of violence. His celebrated poem “Women Who Cook” (Khānā Banātī Striyāṃ) is not merely about food preparation; it is a searing indictment of patriarchal domestic structures that reduce women’s existence to endless, unpaid labour.

The price of silence: Why Modi won’t follow Shastri, appeal for sacrifice

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey* In 1965, as India grappled with war and a crippling food crisis, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri faced a United States that used wheat shipments under the PL-480 agreement as a lever to dictate Indian foreign policy. Shastri’s response remains legendary: he appealed to the nation to skip one meal a day. Millions of middle-class households complied, choosing temporary hunger over the sacrifice of national dignity. Today, India faces a modern equivalent in the energy sector, yet the leadership’s response stands in stark contrast to that era of self-reliance.

Search This Blog