Skip to main content

Gas exploration: Reliance Industries' seeks higher price than offered by Govt of India

By Rajiv Shah 
In a significant move, the Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL) has declared that the “higher price” being offered by the Government of India to it for oil and gas exploration off Andhra Pradesh coast is “not market linked”, and it should get an even more, in keeping with market realities. The "revision", which the Government of India has still not formally announced, is from $4.2 per MMBtu (million British thermal units) to $8.4 MMBtu, which was challenged by several politicians, including Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader Arvind Kejriwal, who claimed it would mean a “windfall” of Rs 54,500 crore to the RIL.
RIL has quoted a top energy consultant to suggest that the price it should get should be somewhere between $8 and 12, and not just $8.4, in order to ensure that the exploration becomes viable. In a just-released book, “India Has Never Been Here Before”, the RIL has quoted HIS-CERA to say how much should the price be to make an exploration project viable. It says, for onshore exploration and production, the price should be $6-8 per MMBtu, for shallow waters $6-10 per MMBtu, for deepwater $8-12 per MMBtu, and for ultra-deepwater $10-12 per MMBtu.
The RIL’s KG-D-6 operation off Andhra Pradesh coast near Kakinada, named after founder of the company, late Dhirubhai Ambani, falls under “deepwater operations” category. Regretting the “campaign against the revised gas prices”, the RIL insists, “The revised domestic gas price estimated at $8.4/MMBtu … is still not market linked price… and taken on an energy parity basis, is far cheaper compared to alternative fuels being sold without government subsidy.”
Insisting that the price being offered was approved after a gap of seven years, and is to be effective April 1, 2014, the RIL has suggested, in these seven years the price fixed at $4.205 per MMBtu had gone unviable quite some time back. “The prices of other commodities, offshore services, consumer items, etc. have increased disproportionately compared to the revised gas price. Crude oil prices have moved from around $30 per barrel to over $100 per barrel and imported LNG from around $4 per MMBtu to over $14 per MMBtu.”
Risk in exploration, as seen by RIL
The RIL warns, “If domestic gas is not offered at market price, it will result in rapid depreciation of the Indian rupee. There are currently over 100 discoveries but only a few are under production as companies do not find it viable to produce at current prices. This inability to produce gas at current prices will increase dependence on expensive imports and adversely impact our balance of payments.” It quotes HIS-CERA to say that the current gas demand-supply gap at 45 per cent can balloon 80 per cent in 2025. Only a “price hike will make more gas available as more discoveries can be produced reducing the need to import gas”, it says.
The RIL won the KG-D-6 block in 2000 under the Government of India’s New Exploration and Licensing Policy (NELP) following an international bidding. It has gone on to justify its claim for a still higher price than what it is being offered by saying the contractor involved in gas exploration has to bear the entire risk. “The costs are steep. Drilling and exploration of a well in deep waters can cost more than Rs 700 crore. Even if a well strikes oil or gas, the quantum of reserves can only be estimated in terms of probability.” Further, “Each development well costs even more at Rs 1,200 to 1,400 crore”.
Giving financial reasoning for the high risk, the RIL says it has already “invested $12.6 billion, and remains the largest investor under NELP.” It adds, “RIL currently retains only 7 blocks (of which six are off-shore) of the 45 blocks awarded under pre-NELP and NELP rounds. It invested $ 1.92 (Rs 12,000 crore) on the 37 surrendered NELP blocks. It is likely to surrender two more blocks. Many blocks with discoveries had to be relinquished as they were unviable to develop at the current price of $4.205 per MMBtu.”
As of now, the RIL says, it has found 2.279 trillion cubic feet (tcf) of gas from the oil fields under it, as against nearly 14.5 tcf it had claimed earlier. Arguing against those who say the RIL is “hoarding” gas (especially Kejriwal), it says, “The decline in production in KG-D6 fields blocks is due to reservoir complexity and geological surprises… The issue can be easily settled by getting the existing reserves assessed and certified through any expert international reserve certification agency…”

Comments

TRENDING

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

  By Rajiv Shah   This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.

Love letters in a lifelong war: Babusha Kohli’s resistance in verse

By Ravi Ranjan*  “War does not determine who is right—only who is left.” Bertrand Russell’s words echo hauntingly in our times, and few contemporary Hindi poets embody this truth as profoundly as Babusha Kohli. Emerging from Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Kohli has carved a unique space in literature by weaving together tenderness, protest, and philosophy across poetry, prose, and cinema. Her work is not merely artistic expression—it is resistance, refuge, and a call for peace.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Asbestos contamination in children’s products highlights global oversight gaps

By A Representative   A commentary published by the International Ban Asbestos Secretariat (IBAS) has drawn attention to the challenges governments face in responding effectively to global public-health risks. In an article written by Laurie Kazan-Allen and published on March 5, 2026, the author examines how the discovery of asbestos contamination in children’s play products has raised questions about regulatory oversight and international product safety. The article opens by reflecting on lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that governments in several countries were slow to respond to early warning signs of the crisis. Referring to the experience of the United Kingdom, the author writes that delays in implementing protective measures contributed to “232,112 recorded deaths and over a million people suffering from long Covid.” The commentary uses this example to illustrate what it describes as the dangers of underestimating emerging threats. Attention then turns...

Echoes of Vietnam and Chile: The devastating cost of the I-A Axis in Iran

​ By Ram Puniyani  ​The recent joint military actions by Israel and the United States against Iran have been devastating. Like all wars, this conflict is brutal to its core, leaving a trail of human suffering in its wake. The stated pretext for this aggression—the brutality of the Ayatollah Khamenei regime and its nuclear ambitions—clashes sharply with the reality of the diplomatic landscape. Iran had expressed a willingness to remain at the negotiating table, signaling a readiness to concede points emerging from dialogue. 

Authoritarian destruction of the public sphere in Ecuador: Trumpism in action?

By Pilar Troya Fernández  The situation in Ecuador under Daniel Noboa's government is one of authoritarianism advancing on several fronts simultaneously to consolidate neoliberalism and total submission to the US international agenda. These are not isolated measures, but rather a coordinated strategy that combines job insecurity, the dismantling of the welfare state, unrestricted access to mining, the continuation of oil exploitation without environmental considerations, the centralization of power through the financial suffocation of local governments, and the systematic criminalization of all forms of opposition and popular organization.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

The kitchen as prison: A feminist elegy for domestic slavery

By Garima Srivastava* Kumar Ambuj stands as one of the most incisive voices in contemporary Hindi poetry. His work, stripped of ornamentation, speaks directly to the lived realities of India’s marginalized—women, the rural poor, and those crushed under invisible forms of violence. His celebrated poem “Women Who Cook” (Khānā Banātī Striyāṃ) is not merely about food preparation; it is a searing indictment of patriarchal domestic structures that reduce women’s existence to endless, unpaid labour.

The price of silence: Why Modi won’t follow Shastri, appeal for sacrifice

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey*  ​In 1965, as India grappled with war and a crippling food crisis, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri faced a United States that used wheat shipments under the PL-480 agreement as a lever to dictate Indian foreign policy. Shastri’s response remains legendary: he appealed to the nation to skip one meal a day. Millions of middle-class households complied, choosing temporary hunger over the sacrifice of national dignity. Today, India faces a modern equivalent in the energy sector, yet the leadership’s response stands in stark contrast to that era of self-reliance.