Skip to main content

Top Gujarat PSU forfeits its claim of going multinational, withdraws from Egypt

By Rajiv Shah 
In its first major decision to take the former state blue-chip public sector undertaking (PSU) out of the red, the Gujarat State Petroleum Corporation (GSPC) has taken a formal decision to withdraw from its most important overseas adventure – Egypt. A well-placed source in the Gujarat government has told Counterview that the GSPC board took the decision to withdraw from Egypt after dilly-dallying on the matter for above a year. “The board met recently. It decided to withdraw following a discussion, in which GSPC managing-director Tapan Ray insisted that withdrawal was essential to bring the GSPC out of the red and also in view of unstable political atmosphere in Egypt”, the source said. The decision to withdraw followed a recent communication by the Petroleum and Natural Gas Ministry, Government of India, to the Ministry of External Affairs that the Indian consortium led by the GSPC, with Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (HPCL) and Oil India Limited (OIL) as junior partners, had “unanimously” decided not to sign the concessional agreement for two of the offshore oil exploration blocks of South Quseir and South Sinai, located in the Gulf of Suez and Red Sea in Egypt. In all, GSPC had taken five blocks in Egypt in an “aggressive” bid, and managed to rope in two Central PSUs as junior partners.
As for other overseas operations – in Australia, Yemen and Indonesia – the source said, these are “not important and do not involve much funds.” However, the source did not rule out that in due course the GSPC may withdraw from these countries, thereby forfeiting its “self-proclaimed” and “loud” claim of becoming the first state-based PSU in India to go multinational. “The most important of foreign operations was for oil-and-gas exploration in Egypt. It had become unviable from the financial point of view to continue with it”, the source pointed out.
Gujarat government sent at least two delegations, the first one in 2011-end and then in mid-2012, to Egypt to assess and reassess if the Egyptian operation was viable. Finding that the period for exploration was ending in March 2012, then Gujarat chief secretary AK Joti, as GSPC chairman, went to Cairo in 2011-end to assess the situation on the ground. It found that the operation should continue, and made a formal request to the Egyptian government to give extension.
The extension was sought on the ground that the Egyptian authorities had failed to give necessary clearances on time, required from the country’s defence establishment. The decision to continue with the Egyptian operations was taken despite the fact that it was found that the Egyptian operation alone would require another Rs 5,000 crore. The suggestion that withdrawal would be a cheaper option, as it would have to pay 250 million dollars, or about Rs 1,350 crore at the then rate of exchange, was rejected. Joti even declared that “high risk in exploration was worth taking” and the state government would “find money” for it.
“Preliminary results through aerial surveys suggest there is huge oil and gas reserve in the Egyptian areas which we had taken for exploration. There is no question of backing out, though the final decision will have to be taken by Gujarat government”, Joti had said, adding, the Egyptian officials, with whom the chief secretary and other officials held discussions, “agreed” that there was delay in the GSPC’s exploration activities as the PSU was not given necessary clearances on time for preliminary surveys, required from the country’s defence establishment.
The second delegation, was sent more to make an on-the-spot assessment of the GSPC's five blocks in Egypt, and reversed Joti’s claims and recommended to the state government that it should “withdraw from Egypt”. Led by senior financial consultant with the GSPC, Manish Verma, the delegation consisted of top GSPC engineers who made an on the spot assessment. There was some difference of opinion between GSPC engineers sent from Gandhinagar and the senior technocrat who was in charge in Egypt, MY Farooqi. While the former said, it would be “too costly to continue with the operations, Farooqi insisted that it was worth going ahead", a top state official said.
The GSPC went global following Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi’s insistence on the matter in 2006. Then under D Jagatheesa Pandian, who is state energy secretary now, the GSPC bid for and took several oil-and-gas blocks in Egypt, Australia, Indonesia and Yemen. In Egypt alone, it took five blocks. One of the blocks is onshore, situated in a huge expanse of 39,000 sq km area, most of it desert, while the rest of the four are offshore, deep in the Mediterranean. Work for two blocks began, while for the others it could not be commenced.

Comments

TRENDING

Gram sabha as reformer: Mandla’s quiet challenge to the liquor economy

By Raj Kumar Sinha*  This year, the Union Ministry of Panchayati Raj is organising a two-day PESA Mahotsav in Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, on 23–24 December 2025. The event marks the passage of the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA), enacted by Parliament on 24 December 1996 to establish self-governance in Fifth Schedule areas. Scheduled Areas are those notified by the President of India under Article 244(1) read with the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution, which provides for a distinct framework of governance recognising the autonomy of tribal regions. At present, Fifth Schedule areas exist in ten states: Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, Rajasthan and Telangana. The PESA Act, 1996 empowers Gram Sabhas—the village assemblies—as the foundation of self-rule in these areas. Among the many powers devolved to them is the authority to take decisions on local matters, including the regulation...

MG-NREGA: A global model still waiting to be fully implemented

By Bharat Dogra  When the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MG-NREGA) was introduced in India nearly two decades ago, it drew worldwide attention. The reason was evident. At a time when states across much of the world were retreating from responsibility for livelihoods and welfare, the world’s second most populous country—with nearly two-thirds of its people living in rural or semi-rural areas—committed itself to guaranteeing 100 days of employment a year to its rural population.

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

Concerns raised over move to rename MGNREGA, critics call it politically motivated

By A Representative   Concerns have been raised over the Union government’s reported move to rename the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), with critics describing it as a politically motivated step rather than an administrative reform. They argue that the proposed change undermines the legacy of Mahatma Gandhi and seeks to appropriate credit for a programme whose relevance has been repeatedly demonstrated, particularly during times of crisis.

Rollback of right to work? VB–GRAM G Bill 'dilutes' statutory employment guarantee

By A Representative   The Right to Food Campaign has strongly condemned the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) (VB–GRAM G) Bill, 2025, describing it as a major rollback of workers’ rights and a fundamental dilution of the statutory Right to Work guaranteed under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA). In a statement, the Campaign termed the repeal of MGNREGA a “dark day for workers’ rights” and accused the government of converting a legally enforceable, demand-based employment guarantee into a centralised, discretionary welfare scheme.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Making rigid distinctions between Indian and foreign 'historically untenable'

By A Representative   Oral historian, filmmaker and cultural conservationist Sohail Hashmi has said that everyday practices related to attire, food and architecture in India reflect long histories of interaction and adaptation rather than rigid or exclusionary ideas of identity. He was speaking at a webinar organised by the Indian History Forum (IHF).

India’s Halal economy 'faces an uncertain future' under the new food Bill

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  The proposed Food Safety and Standards (Amendment) Bill, 2025 marks a decisive shift in India’s food regulation landscape by seeking to place Halal certification exclusively under government control while criminalising all private Halal certification bodies. Although the Bill claims to promote “transparency” and “standardisation,” its structure and implications raise serious concerns about religious freedom, economic marginalisation, and the systematic dismantling of a long-established, Muslim-led Halal ecosystem in India.

From jobless to ‘job-loss’ growth: Experts critique gig economy and fintech risks

By A Representative   Leading economists and social activists gathered in the capital on Friday to launch the third edition of the State of Finance in India Report 2024-25 , issuing a stark warning that the rapid digitalization of the Indian economy is eroding welfare systems and entrenching "digital dystopia."