Central Information Commission has "no information" on pendency of cases before January 1, 2013

By A Representative

In reply to a right to information (RTI) query, the Central Information Commission (CIC) – which India’s highest body to hear appeals to RTI applications to the Government of India and other Central authorities – has said that a whopping 24,326 cases were pending to be cleared by before it “as on October 2013”. The reply, sent to an RTI applicant, Kalpeshkumar Gupta of the Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad, interestingly, said that “before January 1, 2013, pendency of cases was not maintained by the CIC.” Gupta had demanded “appeals pending for years” before it.

The only other information available about the appeals and complaints, separately, before the CIC, said the reply, is between October 12, 2005 and January 1, 2006 – the number of registered cases before it was 703, while the number of disposals was 682 during the period. The reply said, “The RTI Act came in force as on October 12, 2005.” It added, “Neither appeals nor complaints before October 2005 were filed with the commission.”

In fact, the reply clarifies, “The commission does not compile statistics separately for appeals and complaints.” Hence, it pointed out, information is not maintained by the CIC in the format requested by the applicant in the format he wanted – year and month-wise details of opening balance of appeals and complaints, the appeals and complaints admitted, those that have been disposed of, and the closing balance.

The reply also said that it did not have any information about year-wise compensation awarded under section 19(8)(b) of the RTI Act, 2005, which provides for compensating the applicant for delay in providing information. Nor did it have any information about year-wise details of disciplinary action initiated under Section 20(2) of the RTI Act, under which disciplinary action has provided for in case the public information officer deliberately hides information with a mala fide intention. “Information is not maintained by the CIC”, the reply says.

As regards imposition of penalty, the reply says, “the progressive figure of cases, as on February 19, 2013, was 864, in which penalty has been imposed. The total amount of penalty imposed since 2007-08 is Rs 1.62 crore, out of which Rs 98.40 lakh has been recovered so far.”

At the same time, it clarifies, “The commission does not maintain year-wise data in this regard. In certain cases, the PIOs have preferred for waiver and stay on penalty amount. Although in some cases the commission has been made a party, there are many instances where the commission is not made a party.”

To the query “what is the procedure for allocation of appeal and complaint cases”, the reply says, “Appeals and complaints ascertaining from the responses of the Central PIOs/ appellate authorities of the public authorities are allocated among the information commissioners in accordance with the ministry/ department/ public authority-wise; work allocation is decided by the chief information commissioner under section 12(4) of the RTI Act.”

In yet another reply to the question regarding “staff details of all levels, ie information commissioner to peon”, the CIC’s IPO says that out of the sanctioned staff of one chief information commissioner and 10 information commissioners, six posts of information commissioners are vacant. As for the rest of the staff, as against the sanctioned staff of 160, there is a vacancy of 20.

Comments

Unknown said…

People in glasshouses should not throw stones ! Does CIC have any moral right to order CPIOs to disclose information if it does not have basic info itself. Make a strong first appeal. Also appeal against something called "Nodal CPIO". There is no such designation as per RTI Act. Only the CPIO can provide information under his own signature.
Please read: http://www.rtiindia.org/forum/116643-nodal-cpio-cic-illegal.html

November 24, 2013

Gram sabha as reformer: Mandla’s quiet challenge to the liquor economy

By Raj Kumar Sinha* This year, the Union Ministry of Panchayati Raj is organising a two-day PESA Mahotsav in Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, on 23–24 December 2025. The event marks the passage of the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA), enacted by Parliament on 24 December 1996 to establish self-governance in Fifth Schedule areas. Scheduled Areas are those notified by the President of India under Article 244(1) read with the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution, which provides for a distinct framework of governance recognising the autonomy of tribal regions. At present, Fifth Schedule areas exist in ten states: Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, Rajasthan and Telangana. The PESA Act, 1996 empowers Gram Sabhas—the village assemblies—as the foundation of self-rule in these areas. Among the many powers devolved to them is the authority to take decisions on local matters, including the regulation...

MG-NREGA: A global model still waiting to be fully implemented

By Bharat Dogra When the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MG-NREGA) was introduced in India nearly two decades ago, it drew worldwide attention. The reason was evident. At a time when states across much of the world were retreating from responsibility for livelihoods and welfare, the world’s second most populous country—with nearly two-thirds of its people living in rural or semi-rural areas—committed itself to guaranteeing 100 days of employment a year to its rural population.

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor* This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

Concerns raised over move to rename MGNREGA, critics call it politically motivated

By A Representative Concerns have been raised over the Union government’s reported move to rename the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), with critics describing it as a politically motivated step rather than an administrative reform. They argue that the proposed change undermines the legacy of Mahatma Gandhi and seeks to appropriate credit for a programme whose relevance has been repeatedly demonstrated, particularly during times of crisis.

Rollback of right to work? VB–GRAM G Bill 'dilutes' statutory employment guarantee

By A Representative The Right to Food Campaign has strongly condemned the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) (VB–GRAM G) Bill, 2025, describing it as a major rollback of workers’ rights and a fundamental dilution of the statutory Right to Work guaranteed under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA). In a statement, the Campaign termed the repeal of MGNREGA a “dark day for workers’ rights” and accused the government of converting a legally enforceable, demand-based employment guarantee into a centralised, discretionary welfare scheme.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Making rigid distinctions between Indian and foreign 'historically untenable'

By A Representative Oral historian, filmmaker and cultural conservationist Sohail Hashmi has said that everyday practices related to attire, food and architecture in India reflect long histories of interaction and adaptation rather than rigid or exclusionary ideas of identity. He was speaking at a webinar organised by the Indian History Forum (IHF).

India’s Halal economy 'faces an uncertain future' under the new food Bill

By Syed Ali Mujtaba* The proposed Food Safety and Standards (Amendment) Bill, 2025 marks a decisive shift in India’s food regulation landscape by seeking to place Halal certification exclusively under government control while criminalising all private Halal certification bodies. Although the Bill claims to promote “transparency” and “standardisation,” its structure and implications raise serious concerns about religious freedom, economic marginalisation, and the systematic dismantling of a long-established, Muslim-led Halal ecosystem in India.

From jobless to ‘job-loss’ growth: Experts critique gig economy and fintech risks

By A Representative Leading economists and social activists gathered in the capital on Friday to launch the third edition of the State of Finance in India Report 2024-25 , issuing a stark warning that the rapid digitalization of the Indian economy is eroding welfare systems and entrenching "digital dystopia."

Search This Blog