Skip to main content

Public health group NAPi opposes fresh consultations on front-of-pack warning labels

By A Representative 
Nutrition Advocacy in Public Interest (NAPi) has written to the Chairperson of the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI), expressing concern over the regulator’s decision to convene another stakeholder consultation on the Food Safety and Standards (Labelling and Display) Regulations, 2020, particularly regarding the introduction of front-of-pack warning labels on packaged food products.
In a letter addressed to FSSAI Chairperson Punya Salila Srivastava, NAPi said the additional consultation scheduled on 19 March could delay the implementation of an important public health measure aimed at informing consumers about foods high in fat, sugar and salt.
NAPi, a network of public health professionals and consumer advocates, acknowledged the opportunity to participate in regulatory discussions but questioned the need for reopening deliberations on front-of-pack labelling, stating that the issue has already undergone extensive consultations and technical reviews over several years.
The group pointed out that the matter is also under consideration before the Supreme Court of India, which has suggested that pre-packaged food products should carry warning labels on the front of the package to alert consumers. According to NAPi, reopening broad consultations at this stage could further postpone the adoption of a long-pending consumer protection measure.
The organisation also raised concerns about the participation of food industry associations in the consultation process, saying their commercial interests could create conflicts of interest in regulatory decision-making. NAPi argued that while industry perspectives may be relevant during the implementation phase, the design of public health warnings intended to inform consumers about unhealthy food products should remain insulated from commercial influence. It added that consumer protection must remain paramount under provisions of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.
NAPi urged FSSAI to proceed with the regulatory process for front-of-pack warning labels based on existing evidence, past consultations and judicial observations rather than initiating further rounds of stakeholder deliberations. It also requested the regulator to ensure that future consultations on food regulatory design remain free from commercial influence.
As part of its submissions, NAPi said it had earlier developed a prototype for a simple front-of-pack warning label in Hindi and English intended to clearly communicate health risks associated with foods high in fat, sugar and salt. The organisation stated that the design follows an evidence-based and consumer-oriented approach and has been shared with the authority along with a scientific paper for consideration.
The group also noted that the Economic Survey 2025–26 has recommended the adoption of front-of-pack warning labels as a public health measure to help consumers make informed dietary choices.
The letter was signed by Arun Gupta, convenor of NAPi, who reiterated the organisation’s commitment to supporting evidence-based food policies that place consumer interest and public health at the centre of regulatory decision-making.

Comments

TRENDING

The “Dr” debate masks a larger crisis in allied-health education

By Dr P K Gupta*  India’s allied-health professions have long operated in a fragmented landscape of universities, hospitals, State authorities and private institutions, each with its own nomenclature, curriculum and standards. The National Commission for Allied and Healthcare Professions Act, 2021 was meant to correct this by creating a unified national framework for education, professional regulation and institutional recognition. Few dispute the need for such oversight. The real question is whether standardisation is quietly becoming synonymous with longer courses, additional internships and new professional titles—changes that risk masking deeper gaps in clinical training, institutional capacity and affordability.

Pilgrimage or pollution? The waste crisis of Indian faith

By Raj Kumar Sinha*  In today's times, there are certain issues that are constantly talked about and discussed, yet no visible impact seems to be made. Beyond water, soil, and pollution, one crisis that continues to be overlooked is waste. Like other life-threatening problems, waste too is gradually moving toward burying and obliterating us. After the Kanwar Yatra in Haridwar, approximately 8,000 tonnes of waste were left behind on the riverbanks, including bottles filled with urine. 

Arrival of USS Lincoln: A ‘leisure trip’ to Thailand or a neo-colonial move to commodify women?

By Benyasiri Eimviriyapong   The arrival of the USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72) for a ‘leisure trip’ in Thailand before returning to its campaign of destruction against the people of West Asia demands immediate interrogation and opposition. For us Thai people, and those in sites of American plunder across the globe, this a rattling of the US’ cold war colonial chains on its most loyal lap dog, while conducting a war of aggression in Iran and the ongoing genocide in Palestine. In allowing the USS Lincoln to dock, the Thai ruling elites are once again facilitating a system of imperial violence that extends far beyond Southeast Asian borders, a system which in our case, is predicated on sexual violence and femicide.