Skip to main content

Global scrutiny? What the USCIRF report means for religious freedom in India

By Fr. Cedric Prakash SJ* 
On March 4, 2026, the US Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) released its Annual Report 2026 in Washington. The USCIRF website states: “The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) is an independent, bipartisan legislative branch agency created by the 1998 International Religious Freedom Act (IRFA), as amended. USCIRF monitors the universal right to freedom of religion or belief (FoRB) abroad; makes policy recommendations to the President, Secretary of State, and Congress; and tracks the implementation of these recommendations. USCIRF’s analysis is based on international standards. Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights affirms that: ‘Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.’”
In a detailed chapter on India, the report states that religious freedom conditions continued to deteriorate in 2025. It notes that the Indian government introduced and enforced new legislation targeting religious minority communities and their places of worship. Several states attempted to introduce or strengthen anti-conversion laws with harsher prison sentences. Authorities allegedly facilitated widespread detention and illegal expulsion of citizens and religious refugees, while tolerating vigilante attacks against minority communities. Hindu nationalist mobs, the report claims, harassed and incited violence against Muslims and Christians with impunity across several states throughout the year.
The section on India is scathing, backed by data and evidence that the report presents as incontrovertible. It also holds the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and the Research and Analysis Wing (R&AW) responsible for the situation faced by minorities. The USCIRF has recommended that the US government designate India as a “Country of Particular Concern” (CPC).
The Commission has made far-reaching recommendations to the US government, including:
- Designating India as a CPC for engaging in and tolerating systematic, ongoing, and egregious violations of religious freedom, as defined by the International Religious Freedom Act (IRFA);
- Pressing India to allow US government entities such as USCIRF and the US Department of State to conduct in-country assessments of religious freedom conditions;
- Imposing targeted sanctions on individuals and entities, including India’s Research and Analysis Wing and the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), by freezing assets and/or barring entry into the United States;
- Linking future US security assistance and bilateral trade policies with India to improvements in religious freedom;
- Enforcing Section 6 of the Arms Export Control Act to halt arms sales to India based on continued acts of intimidation and harassment against US citizens and religious minorities.
The report also recommends that the US Congress reintroduce and pass the Transnational Repression Reporting Act of 2024, mandating annual reporting on acts of transnational repression by the Indian government targeting religious minorities in the United States.
If implemented seriously, these recommendations could have a profound impact on US–India relations.
On Monday, March 16, the Government of India responded to the USCIRF report. Randhir Jaiswal, spokesperson for the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), stated: “We have taken note of the latest report of the US Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF). We categorically reject its motivated and biased characterisation of India. For several years now, USCIRF has persisted in presenting a distorted and selective picture of India, relying on questionable sources and ideological narratives rather than objective facts.” He added: “Such repeated misrepresentations only undermine the credibility of the Commission itself. Instead of persisting with selective criticism of India, USCIRF would do well to reflect on disturbing incidents of vandalism and attacks on Hindu temples in the United States, selective targeting of India, and growing intolerance and intimidation of members of the Indian diaspora in the United States, which merit serious attention.”
This response reflects a familiar pattern of denial by a regime that appears unwilling to confront uncomfortable truths. Reports continue to surface in sections of the Indian media—despite increasing pressures—highlighting how religious minorities, particularly Muslims, Christians, and Sikhs, face discrimination, demonisation, and, at times, violence. These realities cannot be easily dismissed, even by a government adept at shaping narratives.
India has also fared poorly on several global indices in recent years. The moral authority it once held as a non-aligned nation under Jawaharlal Nehru appears diminished. Diplomatic and political choices in recent times have raised concerns about the country’s global standing and priorities.
The government’s rejection of the USCIRF report, instead of engaging with its findings, risks further reputational damage. A more constructive approach could have included:
- Accepting the report in good faith and initiating corrective measures;
- Responding point by point with verifiable evidence to challenge the findings;
- Inviting USCIRF to visit India and independently assess conditions across the country by engaging with diverse communities;
- Demonstrating a genuine commitment to safeguarding freedom of religion for all citizens.
Years ago, in his poem Pity the Nation, Lawrence Ferlinghetti wrote: “Pity the nation whose leaders are liars, whose sages are silenced, and whose bigots haunt the airwaves.” To that, one might add: a nation where freedom of religion is under strain.
This remains a deeply contested and urgent reality in India today.
---
*Human rights, reconciliation, peace activist, writer

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

The golden crop: How turmeric is transforming women's lives in tribal India

By Vikas Meshram*   When the lush green fields of turmeric sway in the tribal belt of southern Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, and Gujarat, it is not merely a spice crop — it is the golden glow of self-reliance. In villages where even basic spices once had to be bought from the market, the very soil today is yielding a prosperity that has transformed the lives of thousands of families. At the heart of this transformation is the initiative of Vaagdhara, which has linked turmeric with livelihoods, nutrition, and village self-governance — gram swaraj.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Authoritarian destruction of the public sphere in Ecuador: Trumpism in action?

By Pilar Troya Fernández  The situation in Ecuador under Daniel Noboa's government is one of authoritarianism advancing on several fronts simultaneously to consolidate neoliberalism and total submission to the US international agenda. These are not isolated measures, but rather a coordinated strategy that combines job insecurity, the dismantling of the welfare state, unrestricted access to mining, the continuation of oil exploitation without environmental considerations, the centralization of power through the financial suffocation of local governments, and the systematic criminalization of all forms of opposition and popular organization.

Echoes of Vietnam and Chile: The devastating cost of the I-A Axis in Iran

​ By Ram Puniyani  ​The recent joint military actions by Israel and the United States against Iran have been devastating. Like all wars, this conflict is brutal to its core, leaving a trail of human suffering in its wake. The stated pretext for this aggression—the brutality of the Ayatollah Khamenei regime and its nuclear ambitions—clashes sharply with the reality of the diplomatic landscape. Iran had expressed a willingness to remain at the negotiating table, signaling a readiness to concede points emerging from dialogue. 

False claim? What Venezuela is witnessing is not surrender but a tactical retreat

By Manolo De Los Santos  The early morning hours of January 3, 2026, marked an inflection point in Venezuela and Latin America’s centuries-long struggle for self-determination and independence. Operation Absolute Resolve, ordered by the Trump administration, constituted the most brutal and direct military assault on a sovereign state in the region in recent memory. In a shocking operation that left hundreds dead, President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores were illegally kidnapped from Venezuelan soil and transported to the United States, where they now face fabricated charges in a New York federal detention facility. In the two months since this act of war, a torrent of speculation has emerged from so-called experts and pundits across the political spectrum. This has followed three main lines: One . The operation’s success indicated treason at the highest levels of the Bolivarian Revolution. Two . Acting President Delcy Rodríguez and the remaining leadership have abandone...

The selective memory of a violent city: Uttam Nagar and the invisible victims of Delhi

By Sunil Kumar*  Hundreds of murders take place in Delhi every year, yet only a few incidents become topics of nationwide discussion. The question is: why does this happen? Today, the incident in Uttam Nagar has become the centre of national debate. A 26-year-old man, Tarun Kumar, was killed following a dispute that reportedly began after a balloon hit a small child. In several colonies of Delhi, slogans such as “Jai Shri Ram” and “Vande Mataram” are being raised while demanding the death penalty for Tarun’s killers. As a result, nearly 50,000 residents of Hastsal JJ Colony are now living in what resembles a state of confinement. 

The price of silence: Why Modi won’t follow Shastri, appeal for sacrifice

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey*  ​In 1965, as India grappled with war and a crippling food crisis, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri faced a United States that used wheat shipments under the PL-480 agreement as a lever to dictate Indian foreign policy. Shastri’s response remains legendary: he appealed to the nation to skip one meal a day. Millions of middle-class households complied, choosing temporary hunger over the sacrifice of national dignity. Today, India faces a modern equivalent in the energy sector, yet the leadership’s response stands in stark contrast to that era of self-reliance.

Gujarat government urged to introduce heat-stress safety rules for construction workers

By A Representative   A representation submitted to Gujarat Labour, Skill Development and Employment Minister Kunvarji Bavaliya has urged the state government to introduce legally enforceable safety standards to protect construction workers from extreme heat and heatwaves, and to launch a financial assistance scheme for labourers affected by climate-related health risks.