Skip to main content

From isolation to integration: How Russia, China, and India are reshaping the world order

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* 
The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit in China has underscored the shifting direction of global politics. Efforts to isolate Russia have failed, and Europe’s Russophobia has backfired, pushing Moscow to deepen ties with China and the Global South. Russia–China energy cooperation, in particular, will have long-term consequences for Europe, once heavily dependent on Russian gas.
Former U.S. President Donald Trump’s penchant for public bullying alienated many global leaders. His unnecessary comments on the Russia–China–India engagement at the SCO only hardened India’s resolve to participate more actively in the grouping. Until recently, India was seen as hesitant in SCO matters. Ironically, U.S. pressure and attempted humiliation nudged Prime Minister Narendra Modi to alter course.
For any durable diplomacy, the principle must remain clear: sovereign countries—whether India, Russia, or Venezuela—must be free to choose their partners. India does not require permission from Washington or Brussels to frame its foreign policy. Unfortunately, the Trump administration often displayed undiplomatic behavior that resembled street-level aggression rather than statesmanship.
Washington’s renewed interest in a “regime change” operation in Venezuela is likely to fuel unrest in South America, just as similar interventions created instability in Iraq, Libya, and Syria. Plans against Iran, often pushed in tandem with Israel, will only deepen the global crisis. What remains troubling is the inability—or unwillingness—of the U.S. to restrain its closest ally, Israel, leading many to ask: who influences whom?
Every nation today prioritizes its own interests. India engages both Russia and Ukraine; China supports Pakistan but values India’s economic and cultural weight; Russia negotiates with the U.S. while strengthening its China ties. Turkey too juggles contradictory alliances. Such pragmatism is not hypocrisy but the very essence of diplomacy.
Unfortunately, in the age of social media, loud posturing often overshadows nuanced diplomacy. Modi’s domestic image-building—through edited visuals portraying him as a global master of diplomacy—only provokes counter-narratives. Allegations of betrayal, such as Russia speaking with Pakistan, miss the point. International summits are forums for dialogue; engagement across divides is natural, not scandalous.
What truly damages diplomacy is the kind of behavior Trump displayed—publicly mocking Ukraine’s President Zelensky, patronizing Liberia’s leader for his “wonderful English,” and lecturing South Africa’s president about internal affairs. Such condescension signals disrespect and weakens trust.
India’s foreign policy is ultimately shaped by economics. Many Modi supporters abroad—particularly in the U.S., U.K., and Europe—have vested business interests, discouraging any deterioration of ties. Likewise, Gujarat-based businesses with Chinese investments see Beijing as indispensable. The Russian oil trade enriched companies but hardly benefited ordinary Indians. Personal relationships matter, but economic realities remain paramount.
Contrary to Western stereotypes, Russian leaders understand English but often avoid speaking it publicly to prevent misinterpretations. Their preference for written statements highlights a professionalism absent in the casual, sometimes careless style of U.S. diplomacy.
Since the Second World War, the world has changed dramatically. The war in Ukraine is reshaping global alignments, while the European Union’s political missteps are pushing it toward isolation, with individual states asserting independent policies. A prolonged conflict will only weaken Europe further.
What the world needs today is stability. Another global recession or a wider war could unleash an unprecedented crisis. Every effort must be made to end conflicts—not only in Ukraine, but also in Gaza and Venezuela. A peace-driven economy would be far more durable and democratic than one fueled by militarism, which serves only elites in Brussels, London, and Washington.
---
*Human rights defender

Comments

TRENDING

Gujarat Information Commission issues warning against misinterpretation of RTI orders

By A Representative   The Gujarat Information Commission (GIC) has issued a press note clarifying that its orders limiting the number of Right to Information (RTI) applications for certain individuals apply only to those specific applicants. The GIC has warned that it will take disciplinary action against any public officials who misinterpret these orders to deny information to other citizens. The press note, signed by GIC Secretary Jaideep Dwivedi, states that the Right to Information Act, 2005, is a powerful tool for promoting transparency and accountability in public administration. However, the commission has observed that some applicants are misusing the act by filing an excessive number of applications, which disproportionately consumes the time and resources of Public Information Officers (PIOs), First Appellate Authorities (FAAs), and the commission itself. This misuse can cause delays for genuine applicants seeking justice. In response to this issue, and in acc...

'MGNREGA crisis deepening': NSM demands fair wages and end to digital exclusions

By A Representative   The NREGA Sangharsh Morcha (NSM), a coalition of independent unions of MGNREGA workers, has warned that the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) is facing a “severe crisis” due to persistent neglect and restrictive measures imposed by the Union Government.

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

Gandhiji quoted as saying his anti-untouchability view has little space for inter-dining with "lower" castes

By A Representative A senior activist close to Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA) leader Medha Patkar has defended top Booker prize winning novelist Arundhati Roy’s controversial utterance on Gandhiji that “his doctrine of nonviolence was based on an acceptance of the most brutal social hierarchy the world has ever known, the caste system.” Surprised at the police seeking video footage and transcript of Roy’s Mahatma Ayyankali memorial lecture at the Kerala University on July 17, Nandini K Oza in a recent blog quotes from available sources to “prove” that Gandhiji indeed believed in “removal of untouchability within the caste system.”

Targeted eviction of Bengali-speaking Muslims across Assam districts alleged

By A Representative   A delegation led by prominent academic and civil rights leader Sandeep Pandey  visited three districts in Assam—Goalpara, Dhubri, and Lakhimpur—between 2 and 4 September 2025 to meet families affected by recent demolitions and evictions. The delegation reported widespread displacement of Bengali-speaking Muslim communities, many of whom possess valid citizenship documents including Aadhaar, voter ID, ration cards, PAN cards, and NRC certification. 

Subject to geological upheaval, the time to listen to the Himalayas has already passed

By Rajkumar Sinha*  The people of Uttarakhand and Himachal Pradesh, who have somehow survived the onslaught of reckless development so far, are crying out in despair that within the next ten to fifteen years their very existence will vanish. If one carefully follows the news coming from these two Himalayan states these days, this painful cry does not appear exaggerated. How did these prosperous and peaceful states reach such a tragic condition? What feats of our policymakers and politicians pushed these states to the brink of destruction?

India's health workers have no legal right for their protection, regrets NGO network

Counterview Desk In a letter to Union labour and employment minister Santosh Gangwar, the civil rights group Occupational and Environmental Health Network of India (OEHNI), writing against the backdrop of strike by Bhabha hospital heath care workers, has insisted that they should be given “clear legal right for their protection”.

Rally in Patna: Non-farmer bodies to highlight plight of agriculture in Eastern India ahead of march to Parliament

P Sainath By  A  Representative Ahead of the march to Parliament on November 29-30, 2018, organized by over 210 farmer and agricultural worker organisations of the country demanding a 21-day special session of Parliament to deliberate on remedial measures for safeguarding the interest of farm, farmers and agricultural workers, a mass rally been organized for November 23, Gandhi Sangrahalaya (Gandhi Museum), Gandhi Maidan, Patna. Say the organizers, the Eastern region merits special attention, because, while crisis of farmers and agricultural workers in Western, Southern and Northern India has received some attention in the media and central legislature, the plight of those in the Eastern region of the country (Bihar, Jharkhand, West Bengal, Orissa, Chhattisgarh and Eastern UP) has remained on the margins. To be addressed by P Sainath, founder of People’s Archive of Rural India (PARI), a statement issued ahead of the rally says, the Eastern India was the most prosperous regi...

'Centre criminally negligent': SKM demands national disaster declaration in flood-hit states

By A Representative   The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has urged the Centre to immediately declare the recent floods and landslides in Punjab, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir, Uttarakhand, and Haryana as a national disaster, warning that the delay in doing so has deepened the suffering of the affected population.