Skip to main content

PUCL questions legality of Rohingya refugees’ detention and deportation

By A Representative 
The People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) has raised serious concerns over the Indian government’s deportation of 40 Rohingya refugees, alleging the process was illegal, inhumane, and violated both domestic and international laws. In a statement, the organization claims the refugees, registered with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) India, were detained in Delhi and abandoned in international waters near the Myanmar-Thailand border.
On May 6, 2025, 43 Rohingya refugees from Muslim and Christian communities, including children as young as 15, female minors as young as 16, senior citizens up to 66 years old, and individuals with serious illnesses such as cancer, were detained by Delhi Police under the pretext of collecting biometric data. After being held for over 24 hours at various police stations, they were transferred to the Inderlok Detention Center in Delhi. Subsequently, 40 of them were covertly flown to Port Blair in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands aboard an army aircraft. There, they were allegedly blindfolded, bound, and placed on naval ships. Survivors reported being tortured, beaten, and accused of involvement in a terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir. Women among the group faced sexual harassment and abusive language. The refugees were then abandoned in conflict-ridden waters near Myanmar’s Tanintharyi region, close to Thailand.
A recent report confirms the 40 refugees are now under the protection of Myanmar’s National Unity Government (NUG) in exile, though their exact whereabouts remain undisclosed. Three others remain detained at the Inderlok Detention Center. Additionally, 14 other refugees from two families, detained at Vikaspuri Police Station on May 6, faced illegal detention. While the women were released on May 7, the men were held, relocated on May 8, and reportedly beaten in custody. Some have been released following orders from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dwarka.
PUCL argues the deportation violated India’s obligations under international law, including the UN Convention Against Torture, the 1948 Genocide Convention, and the principle of *non-refoulement*, which prohibits returning individuals to places where they face persecution. The Rohingya, recognized as one of the world’s most persecuted minorities, have faced decades of violence and discrimination in Myanmar, with over a million living as stateless refugees in Bangladesh and others seeking refuge in India, Malaysia, and Thailand. In India, approximately 22,500 Rohingya hold UNHCR Asylum Seeker Certificates, as reported by Refugees International in December 2024.
The organization also claims the actions contravened domestic laws, including constitutional protections under Articles 14 (equality) and 21 (right to life and liberty), as well as the Foreigners Act, which outlines deportation procedures. PUCL criticized the government for ignoring these legal safeguards and noted that the Supreme Court, during a May 8, 2025, hearing on a petition to stop the deportations, declined to intervene, while the government argued that the right to residence under Article 19(1)(e) applies only to citizens. PUCL called this argument misleading, asserting that the Rohingya, as refugees fleeing genocidal violence, are entitled to Article 21 protections available to all persons in India.
PUCL has urged the government to investigate the alleged human rights violations, ensure future deportations adhere to due process, and disclose the whereabouts of detainees for their release to their families. The organization emphasized that India’s actions contradict its historical tradition of offering refuge to persecuted groups, such as the Parsis, and urged adherence to legal and humanitarian standards in the treatment of refugees.

Comments

TRENDING

New RTI draft rules inspired by citizen-unfriendly, overtly bureaucratic approach

By Venkatesh Nayak* The Department of Personnel and Training , Government of India has invited comments on a new set of Draft Rules (available in English only) to implement The Right to Information Act, 2005 . The RTI Rules were last amended in 2012 after a long period of consultation with various stakeholders. The Government’s move to put the draft RTI Rules out for people’s comments and suggestions for change is a welcome continuation of the tradition of public consultation. Positive aspects of the Draft RTI Rules While 60-65% of the Draft RTI Rules repeat the content of the 2012 RTI Rules, some new aspects deserve appreciation as they clarify the manner of implementation of key provisions of the RTI Act. These are: Provisions for dealing with non-compliance of the orders and directives of the Central Information Commission (CIC) by public authorities- this was missing in the 2012 RTI Rules. Non-compliance is increasingly becoming a major problem- two of my non-compliance cases are...

History, culture and literature of Fatehpur, UP, from where Maulana Hasrat Mohani hailed

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  Maulana Hasrat Mohani was a member of the Constituent Assembly and an extremely important leader of our freedom movement. Born in Unnao district of Uttar Pradesh, Hasrat Mohani's relationship with nearby district of Fatehpur is interesting and not explored much by biographers and historians. Dr Mohammad Ismail Azad Fatehpuri has written a book on Maulana Hasrat Mohani and Fatehpur. The book is in Urdu.  He has just come out with another important book, 'Hindi kee Pratham Rachna: Chandayan' authored by Mulla Daud Dalmai.' During my recent visit to Fatehpur town, I had an opportunity to meet Dr Mohammad Ismail Azad Fatehpuri and recorded a conversation with him on issues of history, culture and literature of Fatehpur. Sharing this conversation here with you. Kindly click this link. --- *Human rights defender. Facebook https://www.facebook.com/vbrawat , X @freetohumanity, Skype @vbrawat

Urgent need to study cause of large number of natural deaths in Gulf countries

By Venkatesh Nayak* According to data tabled in Parliament in April 2018, there are 87.76 lakh (8.77 million) Indians in six Gulf countries, namely Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). While replying to an Unstarred Question (#6091) raised in the Lok Sabha, the Union Minister of State for External Affairs said, during the first half of this financial year alone (between April-September 2018), blue-collared Indian workers in these countries had remitted USD 33.47 Billion back home. Not much is known about the human cost of such earnings which swell up the country’s forex reserves quietly. My recent RTI intervention and research of proceedings in Parliament has revealed that between 2012 and mid-2018 more than 24,570 Indian Workers died in these Gulf countries. This works out to an average of more than 10 deaths per day. For every US$ 1 Billion they remitted to India during the same period there were at least 117 deaths of Indian Workers in Gulf ...

N-power plant at Mithi Virdi: CRZ nod is arbitrary, without jurisdiction

By Krishnakant* A case-appeal has been filed against the order of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) and others granting CRZ clearance for establishment of intake and outfall facility for proposed 6000 MWe Nuclear Power Plant at Mithi Virdi, District Bhavnagar, Gujarat by Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) vide order in F 11-23 /2014-IA- III dated March 3, 2015. The case-appeal in the National Green Tribunal at Western Bench at Pune is filed by Shaktisinh Gohil, Sarpanch of Jasapara; Hajabhai Dihora of Mithi Virdi; Jagrutiben Gohil of Jasapara; Krishnakant and Rohit Prajapati activist of the Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti. The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has issued a notice to the MoEF&CC, Gujarat Pollution Control Board, Gujarat Coastal Zone Management Authority, Atomic Energy Regulatory Board and Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) and case is kept for hearing on August 20, 2015. Appeal No. 23 of 2015 (WZ) is filed, a...

Gujarat agate worker, who fought against bondage, died of silicosis, won compensation

Raju Parmar By Jagdish Patel* This is about an agate worker of Khambhat in Central Gujarat. Born in a Vankar family, Raju Parmar first visited our weekly OPD clinic in Shakarpur on March 4, 2009. Aged 45 then, he was assigned OPD No 199/03/2009. He was referred to the Cardiac Care Centre, Khambhat, to get chest X-ray free of charge. Accordingly, he got it done and submitted his report. At that time he was working in an agate crushing unit of one Kishan Bhil.

Budget for 2018-19: Ahmedabad authorities "regularly" under-spend allocation

By Mahender Jethmalani* The Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation’s (AMC's) General Body (Municipal Board) recently passed the AMC’s annual budget estimates of Rs 6,990 crore for 2018-19. AMC’s revenue expenditure for the next financial year is Rs 3,500 crore and development budget (capital budget) is Rs 3,490 crore.

Licy Bharucha’s pilgrimage into the lives of India’s freedom fighters

By Moin Qazi* Book Review: “Oral History of Indian Freedom Movement”, by Dr Licy Bharucha; Pp240; Rs 300; Published by National Museum of Indian Freedom Movement The Congress has won political freedom, but it has yet to win economic freedom, social and moral freedom. These freedoms are harder than the political, if only because they are constructive, less exciting and not spectacular. — Mahatma Gandhi The opening quote of the book by Mahatma Gandhi sums up the true objective of India’s freedom struggle. It also in essence speaks for the multitudes of brave and courageous individuals who aspired to get themselves jailed for the cause of the country’s freedom. A jail term was a strong testimony and credential of patriotism for them. The book has been written by Dr Licy Bharucha, an academically trained political scientist and a scholar of peace studies and Gandhian studies, who was closely associated throughout her life with those who made the struggle for India’s independence the primar...

Warning bells for India: Tribal exploitation by powerful corporate interests may turn into international issue

By Ashok Shrimali* Warning bells are ringing for India. Even as news drops in from Odisha that Adivasi villages, one after another, are rejecting the top UK-based MNC Vedanta's plea for mining, a recent move by two senior scholars Felix Padel and Samarendra Das suggests the way tribals are being exploited in India by powerful international and national business interests may become an international issue. In fact, one has only to count days when things may be taken up at the United Nations level, with India being pushed to the corner. Padel, it may be recalled, is a major British authority on indigenous peoples across the world, with several scholarly books to his credit. 

UP tribal woman human rights defender Sokalo released on bail

By  A  Representative After almost five months in jail, Adivasi human rights defender and forest worker Sokalo Gond has been finally released on bail.Despite being granted bail on October 4, technical and procedural issues kept Sokalo behind bars until November 1. The Citizens for Justice and Peace (CJP) and the All India Union of Forest Working People (AIUFWP), which are backing Sokalo, called it a "major victory." Sokalo's release follows the earlier releases of Kismatiya and Sukhdev Gond in September. "All three forest workers and human rights defenders were illegally incarcerated under false charges, in what is the State's way of punishing those who are active in their fight for the proper implementation of the Forest Rights Act (2006)", said a CJP statement.