Skip to main content

Proposed Telangana record rights Bill 'could undermine' land rights in scheduled areas

By Dr Palla Trinadha Rao* 
The proposed Telangana Record of Rights Bill, 2024, seeks to replace the existing Telangana Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 2020. However, it is in clear violation of the Telangana Scheduled Area Land Transfer Regulation 1 of 1959 (amended in 1971 and 1978) and the Panchayats Extension to Scheduled Areas (PESA) Act of 1996. Tribal groups, including the Adivasi Advocates Association of Telangana, have raised serious concerns about the proposed Bill, which could undermine the land rights of tribal communities.

Violation of scheduled area land transfer regulations and tribal protections

The Telangana State Government has introduced changes in the Record of Rights and initiated the digitization of land records, which threatens the protections afforded to tribals under existing laws. Previously, the Governor promulgated the Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Areas Land Transfer Regulation of 1959 (Regulation I of 1959), amended by Regulation I of 1970, which prohibits the transfer of land to non-tribals in Scheduled Areas. After the bifurcation of Andhra Pradesh, these regulations were adopted by the State of Telangana.
The Koneru Ranga Rao Land Committee, constituted in 2004, highlighted the illegitimacy of landholdings by non-tribals in Scheduled Areas, including government lands and other tenures. The committee found that approximately 15,000 acres of land in the Bhadrachalam agency area were held by non-tribals under an invalid Government Order (No. 41) with a valuation of ₹75 crores as of 2004.
The committee also raised concerns about Utnoor Mandal in the erstwhile Adilabad District, where around 21,062 acres of land were recorded under old pattas held by non-tribals prior to 1950. The authorities were directed to verify whether the non-tribals had obtained the Collector's permission to hold such lands; if not, the lands were to be canceled and assigned to tribals.
Additionally, the committee instructed a review of settlement orders favoring non-tribals, recommending that appeals be filed against any settlement patta issued in contravention of the Land Transfer Regulations (LTR). The Government of Andhra Pradesh issued G.O. Ms. No. 68, affirming that LTR 1 of 1959, as amended by 1 of 1970, takes precedence over Settlement Regulations, rendering any settlement patta granted to non-tribals null and void. However, the Telangana authorities have failed to take action to file appeals against fraudulent settlement pattas obtained by non-tribals in Scheduled Areas.

Non-Tribal eviction and redistribution of land

The committee recommended the eviction of non-tribals from cultivable land in uninhabited or deserted villages, with the land being reallocated to tribals. It also emphasized the need to survey the Billa Number (un surveyed) lands in Kothaguda, erstwhile Warangal District, where approximately 21,000 acres are held by both tribals and non-tribals. Revenue authorities were directed to evict non-tribals from these illegal occupations. Furthermore, the committee called for the takeover of Farari Patta lands from non-tribal occupation under LTR provisions.

Regularization of illlegal land holdings through Sada Bainama

Since 2016, Telangana has been regularizing land transfers based on 'Sada Bainama' (transfers executed on unregistered plain papers). This process has increased the regularization of illegal landholdings by non-tribals, who produce backdated documents to evade the Land Transfer Regulations.
Although Section 5(2) of the Bill, 2024, stipulates that the regularization of unregistered land transactions must comply with the Land Transfer Regulations (LTR) of 1959, the Bill also validates decisions made by revenue officials under the Telangana Rights in Land Pattadar Pass Books Act, 2000. 
In 2004, the Koneru Rangarao Land Committee recommended that unregistered deeds predating the LTR should be inadmissible as evidence for establishing a non-tribal’s right to land in Scheduled Areas. Accordingly, in 2008, the government issued a memo stating that Sada Bainamas produced by non-tribals should not be considered valid.
In Vemula Bhaskara Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh (2008), the Andhra Pradesh High Court ruled that unregistered sale papers cannot be considered valid when examining tribal rights under the LTR.

Contradictions within the Bill 2024

The Bill, 2024, exempts lands assigned, allotted, or alienated by the State from provisions concerning the record of rights and the registration of land transactions, raising significant concerns. Furthermore, the Bill validates pattadar pass books issued under the 2020 Act, introduced by the previous Bharat Rashtra Samithi(BRS) Government. The Andhra Pradesh High Court has ruled that the LTR takes precedence over the Record of Rights Acts, clarifying that non-tribals are not protected under these Acts in the context of LTR inquiries.

Ignoring PESA regulations and tribal gram sabhas

According to the Panchayats Extension to Scheduled Areas (PESA) Rules of 2011, all land transfers must be reviewed by the PESA-notified Gram Sabha to ensure accurate land entries in the record of rights. The Bill, 2024, undermines the role of the Gram Sabha in this process.
The Bill's presumptive value assigned to land entries is inconsistent with the LTR 1 of 1970, which stipulates that lands occupied by non-tribals in Scheduled Areas are presumed to have been acquired through illegal transfers from tribals unless proven otherwise.
Additionally, the Bill introduces provisions from the Civil Procedure Code (CPC) of 1908 for inquiries by appellate and revision authorities, although the CPC does not apply to Scheduled Areas, where Agency Rules, 1924, for civil dispute adjudication are in force.

Empowering tahsildars and undermining LTR

The Bill empowers Tahsildars to act as Registrars for land transactions and to implement mutations of land records. This contradicts the provisions of the Land Transfer Rules 1980, which prescribes a separate procedure for registering documents involving land transfers in Scheduled Areas and imposes restrictions on Registering Officers under the Registration Act, 1908. Under the LTR, permission from the Agent to the Government or District Collector is essential for registering land transactions in Scheduled Areas.

Immunity for revenue officials

The Bill 2024 provides immunity to revenue authorities from civil and criminal liability for errors in recording rights and registering land transactions. This is in stark contrast to the Telangana Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act 2020 ,which included penal measures, such as dismissal from service and criminal proceedings against erring officials.
Despite existing government orders, the enforcement authorities have failed to implement them. Successive governments continue to introduce Record of Rights legislation that disregards tribal protection laws, facilitating the legalization of illegal landholdings by non-tribals in Scheduled Areas.
Call for Review and Amendment of the Bill
It is imperative that the Telangana State Government reviews the provisions of the Telangana Record of Rights Bill, 2024, and aligns it with the Land Transfer Regulations 1 of 1970, the PESA Act, 1996, and the Telangana PESA Rules, 2011. The government should also ensure that its decisions follow the recommendations of the Koneru Ranga Rao Land Committee and previously issued government orders to protect tribal land rights.

Comments

Post a Comment

TRENDING

Grueling summer ahead: Cuttack’s alarming health trends and what they mean for Odisha

By Sudhansu R Das  The preparation to face the summer should begin early in Odisha. People in the state endure long, grueling summer months starting from mid-February and extending until the end of October. This prolonged heat adversely affects productivity, causes deaths and diseases, and impacts agriculture, tourism and the unorganized sector. The social, economic and cultural life of the state remains severely disrupted during the peak heat months.
Post a Comment
»

Concerns raised over move to rename MGNREGA, critics call it politically motivated

By A Representative   Concerns have been raised over the Union government’s reported move to rename the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), with critics describing it as a politically motivated step rather than an administrative reform. They argue that the proposed change undermines the legacy of Mahatma Gandhi and seeks to appropriate credit for a programme whose relevance has been repeatedly demonstrated, particularly during times of crisis.
Post a Comment
»

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.
Post a Comment
»

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.
59 comments
»

Why India must urgently strengthen its policies for an ageing population

By Bharat Dogra   A quiet but far-reaching demographic transformation is reshaping much of the world. As life expectancy rises and birth rates fall, societies are witnessing a rapid increase in the proportion of older people. This shift has profound implications for public policy, and the need to strengthen frameworks for healthy and secure ageing has never been more urgent. India is among the countries where these pressures will intensify most sharply in the coming decades.
Post a Comment
»

MG-NREGA: A global model still waiting to be fully implemented

By Bharat Dogra  When the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MG-NREGA) was introduced in India nearly two decades ago, it drew worldwide attention. The reason was evident. At a time when states across much of the world were retreating from responsibility for livelihoods and welfare, the world’s second most populous country—with nearly two-thirds of its people living in rural or semi-rural areas—committed itself to guaranteeing 100 days of employment a year to its rural population.
Post a Comment
»

School job scam and the future of university degree holders in West Bengal

By Harasankar Adhikari  The school recruitment controversy in West Bengal has emerged as one of the most serious governance challenges in recent years, raising concerns about transparency, institutional accountability, and the broader impact on society. Allegations that school jobs were obtained through irregular means have led to prolonged legal scrutiny, involving both the Calcutta High Court and the Supreme Court of India. In one instance, a panel for high school teacher recruitment was ultimately cancelled after several years of service, following extended judicial proceedings and debate.
Post a Comment
»

India’s Halal economy 'faces an uncertain future' under the new food Bill

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  The proposed Food Safety and Standards (Amendment) Bill, 2025 marks a decisive shift in India’s food regulation landscape by seeking to place Halal certification exclusively under government control while criminalising all private Halal certification bodies. Although the Bill claims to promote “transparency” and “standardisation,” its structure and implications raise serious concerns about religious freedom, economic marginalisation, and the systematic dismantling of a long-established, Muslim-led Halal ecosystem in India.
Post a Comment
»

Women’s rights alliance seeks NCW action against Nitish Kumar over public veil incident

By A Representative   An alliance of women’s rights activists has urged the National Commission for Women (NCW) to initiate legal action against Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar over an incident at a public function in Patna that they allege amounted to a grave violation of a Muslim woman’s dignity and constitutional rights. In a detailed complaint dated December 18, the All India Feminist Alliance (ALIFA), part of the National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM), sought the NCW’s immediate intervention following an episode on December 15 during the distribution of appointment letters to newly recruited AYUSH doctors in Patna. 
Post a Comment
»