Skip to main content

Why today notion of free market, touted as free and fair, is far from reality

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak* 

Historically, markets were established by working people to serve their everyday needs and desires. These markets were grounded in the local communities they served, reflecting the economic and social realities of the time. People would come together in these markets to trade goods and services, fostering a sense of community and mutual dependence.
The primary focus was on meeting the essential needs of the population, ensuring access to food, clothing, tools, and other necessities. In these early markets, transactions were straightforward, often based on barter or simple currency systems, and were characterised by direct interactions between producers and consumers.
This setup allowed for greater transparency and trust, as buyers could directly engage with sellers, understand the origins and quality of the products, and negotiate fair prices. The primary aim was to facilitate the exchange of goods and services in a manner that benefited all parties involved, enhancing the well-being of the entire community.
The markets have historically played a crucial role in transforming economic activities of producers into social activities, thereby establishing and nurturing relationships between producers and consumers. In its earliest forms, the market was more than just a venue for buying and selling goods; it was a vibrant social and cultural institution where people interacted, exchanged ideas, and built community ties.
By facilitating direct interactions between producers and consumers, markets enabled a deeper understanding and appreciation of the goods being traded. Consumers could meet the people who grew their food, made their clothes, or crafted their tools, creating a sense of trust and mutual respect. This direct relationship fostered a sense of accountability among producers, who took pride in the quality of their work, knowing they were serving their neighbours and community members.
The market, both as an institution and as a process, was originally intended to facilitate life, making it easier for people to obtain the goods and services they needed. It was designed to serve the community, providing a space where people could exchange resources efficiently and equitably. The core idea was to enhance the quality of life for everyone involved by ensuring the availability and accessibility of essential products and services and fostering economic and social interdependence.
Market was an institution of solidarity and a process of cooperation for a meaningful life and mutual existence. As societies grew more complex and inter(dependent) economies expanded, the nature of markets evolved. However, the foundational principles of market were changed in the name of promoting free market.
However, the so-called free market in its current form has deviated significantly from this original purpose. Today, it often controls everyday lives, functioning primarily as a tool for profit-making for a select few capitalists. Instead of serving the broader community, the modern market prioritises the interests of large corporations and wealthy individuals.
These entities have the power to influence market dynamics to their advantage, often at the expense of the average consumer and small producer. This shift has led to a situation where the market dictates the terms of economic, social and cultural life, influencing everything from job availability and wages to the prices of essential goods and services. The focus on maximising profit has resulted in practices that undermine the well-being of the broader population, such as monopolistic behaviours, exploitation of labour, and environmental degradation.
In essence, the market has transformed from a community-oriented institution into a profit-driven mechanism that primarily benefits a small elite, often leaving the majority of people with little control over their economic, social, political and cultural purposes of their everyday lives. This distortion of the market's original purpose highlights the need for a re-evaluation of how economic systems are structured and governed to ensure they truly serve the needs and desires of all people, not just a privileged few.
The concept of a free market in all its forms within a capitalist system is often touted as being both free and fair. However, this notion is far from reality. The free market is intended to provide freedom to both consumers and producers, yet in practice, neither group truly experiences this freedom. In a so-called free market, consumers and producers are not provided with sufficient information about the products, their producers, or the costs involved in production.
This lack of transparency leaves consumers in the dark about the reasoning behind pricing decisions. Instead of being a truly open and fair system, the free market operates as a controlled mechanism of global capitalism.
Market as institution was originally intended to facilitate life, making it easier for people to obtain the goods and services they needed
Large corporations dominate this landscape, enhancing their profits by creating a disconnect between consumers and producers. They manipulate the market to establish independent pricing mechanisms that prioritize their interests, often leading to super-profits at the expense of fairness and transparency. Moreover, these corporations often engage in practices that stifle competition, such as forming monopolies or oligopolies, which further undermines the principles of a truly free market.
As a result, consumers face higher prices and limited choices, while smaller producers struggle to survive in an environment skewed heavily in favour of big business. In essence, the so-called free market is less about freedom and fairness and more about the strategic manipulation of economic systems to benefit a select few, exacerbating inequality and reducing the agency of both consumers and producers.
Over time, as markets grew and became more complex, these direct relationships were often replaced by more impersonal transactions. However, the fundamental role of the market in linking economic and social activities remains evident.
Modern movements such as farmers' markets, local artisanal fairs, and community-supported agriculture (CSA) programs are efforts to rekindle these direct connections, emphasizing the social dimensions of economic exchange. Technology and digital market platforms can facilitate these objectives if these digital infrastructures are controlled by the communities.
The market has historically been instrumental in converting economic activities into social ones, establishing meaningful relationships between producers and consumers. This legacy underscores the potential of markets to not only drive economic prosperity but also to build strong, connected communities. It is time to reclaim free and fair market which serves as community hubs, where people gathered not just to trade, but to socialise, share news, and engage in cultural activities.
These interactions helped to weave the economic fabric into the social fabric of the community, making economic activities a vital part of daily life and social cohesion. It is time to struggle and reclaim free market from free marketers of capitalism and defeat its market-driven culture of mass consumerism and alienation.
---
*London Metropolitan University

Comments

TRENDING

Academics urge Azim Premji University to drop FIR against Student Reading Circle

  By A Representative   A group of academics and civil society members has issued an open letter to the leadership of Azim Premji University expressing concern over the filing of a police complaint that led to an FIR against a student-run reading circle following a recent incident of violence on campus. The signatories state that they hold the university in high regard for its commitment to constitutional values, critical inquiry and ethical public engagement, and argue that it is precisely because of this reputation that the present development is troubling.

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

  By Rajiv Shah   This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.

UAPA action against Telangana activist: Criminalising legitimate democratic activity?

By A Representative   The National Investigation Agency's Hyderabad branch has issued notices to more than ten individuals in Telangana in connection with FIR No. RC-04/2025. Those served include activists, former student leaders, civil rights advocates, poets, writers, retired schoolteachers, and local leaders associated with the Communist Party of India (CPI) and the Indian National Congress. 

The ultimate all-time ODI XI: A personal selection of icons across eras

By Harsh Thakor* This is my all-time best XI chosen for ODI (One Day International) cricket:  1. Adam Gilchrist (W) – The absolute master blaster who could create the impact of exploding gunpowder with his electrifying strokeplay. No batsman was more intimidating in his era. Often his knocks decided the fate of games as though the result were premeditated. He escalated batting strike rates to surreal realms.

Aligning too closely with U.S., allies, India’s silence on IRIS Dena raises troubling questions

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The reported sinking of the Iranian ship IRIS Dena in the Indian Ocean near Sri Lanka raises troubling questions about international norms and the credibility of the so-called rule-based order. If indeed the vessel was attacked by the American Navy while returning from a joint exercise in Visakhapatnam, it would represent a serious breach of trust and a violation of the principles that govern such cooperative engagements. Warships participating in these exercises are generally not armed for combat; they are meant to symbolize solidarity and friendship. The incident, therefore, is not only shocking but also deeply ironic.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

The kitchen as prison: A feminist elegy for domestic slavery

By Garima Srivastava* Kumar Ambuj stands as one of the most incisive voices in contemporary Hindi poetry. His work, stripped of ornamentation, speaks directly to the lived realities of India’s marginalized—women, the rural poor, and those crushed under invisible forms of violence. His celebrated poem “Women Who Cook” (Khānā Banātī Striyāṃ) is not merely about food preparation; it is a searing indictment of patriarchal domestic structures that reduce women’s existence to endless, unpaid labour.

Asbestos contamination in children’s products highlights global oversight gaps

By A Representative   A commentary published by the International Ban Asbestos Secretariat (IBAS) has drawn attention to the challenges governments face in responding effectively to global public-health risks. In an article written by Laurie Kazan-Allen and published on March 5, 2026, the author examines how the discovery of asbestos contamination in children’s play products has raised questions about regulatory oversight and international product safety. The article opens by reflecting on lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that governments in several countries were slow to respond to early warning signs of the crisis. Referring to the experience of the United Kingdom, the author writes that delays in implementing protective measures contributed to “232,112 recorded deaths and over a million people suffering from long Covid.” The commentary uses this example to illustrate what it describes as the dangers of underestimating emerging threats. Attention then turns...

India’s foreign policy at crossroads: Cost of silence in the face of aggression

By Venkatesh Narayanan, Sandeep Pandey  The widely anticipated yet unprovoked attack on Iran on March 1 by the United States and Israel has drawn sharp criticism from several quarters around the world. Reports indicate that the strikes have resulted in significant civilian casualties, including 165 elementary school girls, 20 female volleyball players, and many other civilians.