Skip to main content

What lies behind 'killing spree' in Bangladesh triggered by PM Hasina's reservation policy

By Nava Thakuria*
 
After nearly two hundred people, mainly students, were killed by the government armed forces allegedly in liaison with the ruling party affiliates in Bangladesh, Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina has blamed the opposition political leaders for the violence that erupted across the nation. She argued that the government in Dhaka was compelled to impose a strict curfew with an aim to maintain the law and order situation and it will be lifted as the situation improves.
Meanwhile, the poverty-stricken country’s lone Nobel laureate Professor Muhammad Yunus made a clarion call to the international community, including the United Nations, to halt the murder of agitating Bangladeshi nationals across Bangladesh.
“The nationwide killing spree of Bangladeshi students and other citizens must be prevented. I urge the media outlets across the globe to come forward reporting the ground reality so that many precious lives can be saved,” said Prof Yunus, a man of international fame for his revolutionary banking and social business that enhances not only Bangladesh but many nations, but faces personal harassments from PM Hasina with a number of legal charges.
Speaking to this writer from Paris, the visiting octogenarian banker turned social thinker also insisted on quality television debates and pragmatic editorials over the turmoil faced by his beloved country of 170 population, where even the ‘high school students become the victims’ as they joined the anti-quota movement that began on 1 July following a court order reinstating the reservation facility in all government jobs for the dependents of war veterans.
“Engulfed in a serious crisis, Bangladesh witnesses millions of students and others protesting nationals have been attacked by the police and Border Guard Bangladesh personnel leading to more than 200 deaths and 700 injuries, some of whom remain in serious health conditions,” exclaimed Prof Yunus (photo), asserting that ‘there must be investigations into the killings that have taken place already’.
Though it began with a peaceful protest demonstration on the prestigious Dhaka University campus demanding the reservation quota for the dependents of freedom fighters’ families (who fought against the brutal Pakistani forces) to be abolished, it spread quickly to other university campuses and cities to emerge as a national outrage against the Awami League party-led government in Dhaka. 
The general population, who are seemingly unhappy with the Hasina regime that achieved the fourth consecutive victory on 7 January 2024 national elections with no opposition candidates on the field, joined the movement to make it a major challenge to Hasina.
The ruling party leaders, including some ministers in Hasina’s cabinet, alleged that the anti-quota movement was hijacked by the Bangladesh Nationalist Party along with radicalized Jamaat-e-Islami workers to topple the government. They claimed that the so-called agitators with the endorsement of BNP leaders indulged in violent activities. 
BNP chief Khaleda Zia’s son Tarique Rahman, who is living in exile for years, was also accused of hatching a conspiracy against the government. The ruling party leaders also denied the allegation that the quota facility had benefited the loyalists of Hasina alone.
The government imposed a nationwide curfew with the shoot at sight order on 20 July and deployed military personnel to support the police and civilian authorities. The agitation turned violent following the aggression shown by the members of Bangladesh Chhatra League and Juba League (student and youth wing of ruling Awami League) on the agitators. 
Lately the Supreme Court restricted the space for reservation to freedom fighters’ families from 30 to 5 percent. But the apex court did not scrap the reservation policy and the students vowed to continue their movement until the particular quota gets abolished.
The protesting student leaders maintained their additional demands to release all detained leaders, repeal the curfew and reopen the educational institutions across the country. Moreover, they raised voices for the accountability to be fixed on concerned ministers and officers for the brutal crackdown that resulted in the deaths of scores of agitators. 
Various governments, including the United States, advised their citizens to avoid travelling to Bangladesh due to the civil unrest for many days. Indian government also advised the citizens not to visit violence-hit Bangladesh immediately. 
Moreover, the high commission in Dhaka asked around 15,000 Indian nationals in Bangladesh to avoid non-essential travelling. The assistant high commissions in Chittagong, Sylhet and Khulna facilitated many Indians along with the students to return home by air or through Akhurah border point in Tripura, Dawki check gate in Meghalaya and Benapole point in West Bengal. Thousands of students belonging to various parts of India as well as Bhutan and Nepal had left the violence-ridden country.
Prof Yunus called on world leaders to do everything within their powers to end the violence against those who are exercising their rights to protest. The internet and telephone services were thoroughly restricted and so it was unlikely that his fellow citizens could hear the appeal or take their own initiatives. He urged the people of goodwill around the world to add their voices to the call to end this carnage, so that the natives can go back to their mission to build a self-reliant, democratic and peaceful Bangladesh.
---
*Senior journalist based in Guwahati

Comments

TRENDING

Delhi Jal Board under fire as CAG finds 55% groundwater unfit for consumption

By A Representative   A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India audit report tabled in the Delhi Legislative Assembly on 7 January 2026 has revealed alarming lapses in the quality and safety of drinking water supplied by the Delhi Jal Board (DJB), raising serious public health concerns for residents of the capital. 

Zhou Enlai: The enigmatic premier who stabilized chaos—at what cost?

By Harsh Thakor*  Zhou Enlai (1898–1976) served as the first Premier of the People's Republic of China (PRC) from 1949 until his death and as Foreign Minister from 1949 to 1958. He played a central role in the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) for over five decades, contributing to its organization, military efforts, diplomacy, and governance. His tenure spanned key events including the Long March, World War II alliances, the founding of the PRC, the Korean War, and the Cultural Revolution. 

Advocacy group decries 'hyper-centralization' as States’ share of health funds plummets

By A Representative   In a major pre-budget mobilization, the Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA), India’s leading public health advocacy network, has issued a sharp critique of the Union government’s health spending and demanded a doubling of the health budget for the upcoming 2026-27 fiscal year. 

Stands 'exposed': Cavalier attitude towards rushed construction of Char Dham project

By Bharat Dogra*  The nation heaved a big sigh of relief when the 41 workers trapped in the under-construction Silkyara-Barkot tunnel (Uttarkashi district of Uttarakhand) were finally rescued on November 28 after a 17-day rescue effort. All those involved in the rescue effort deserve a big thanks of the entire country. The government deserves appreciation for providing all-round support.

Pairing not with law but with perpetrators: Pavlovian response to lynchings in India

By Vikash Narain Rai* Lynch-law owes its name to James Lynch, the legendary Warden of Galway, Ireland, who tried, condemned and executed his own son in 1493 for defrauding and killing strangers. But, today, what kind of a person will justify the lynching for any reason whatsoever? Will perhaps resemble the proverbial ‘wrong man to meet at wrong road at night!’

Jayanthi Natarajan "never stood by tribals' rights" in MNC Vedanta's move to mine Niyamigiri Hills in Odisha

By A Representative The Odisha Chapter of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity (CSD), which played a vital role in the struggle for the enactment of historic Forest Rights Act, 2006 has blamed former Union environment minister Jaynaynthi Natarjan for failing to play any vital role to defend the tribals' rights in the forest areas during her tenure under the former UPA government. Countering her recent statement that she rejected environmental clearance to Vendanta, the top UK-based NMC, despite tremendous pressure from her colleagues in Cabinet and huge criticism from industry, and the claim that her decision was “upheld by the Supreme Court”, the CSD said this is simply not true, and actually she "disrespected" FRA.

'Threat to farmers’ rights': New seeds Bill sparks fears of rising corporate control

By Bharat Dogra  As debate intensifies over a new seeds bill, groups working on farmers’ seed rights, seed sovereignty and rural self-reliance have raised serious concerns about the proposed legislation. To understand these anxieties, it is important to recognise a global trend: growing control of the seed sector by a handful of multinational companies. This trend risks extending corporate dominance across food and farming systems, jeopardising the livelihoods and rights of small farmers and raising serious ecological and health concerns. The pending bill must be assessed within this broader context.

Climate advocates face scrutiny as India expands coal dependence

By A Representative   The National Alliance for Climate and Environmental Justice (NACEJ) has strongly criticized what it described as coercive actions against climate activists Harjeet Singh and Sanjay Vashisht, following enforcement raids reportedly carried out on the basis of alleged violations of foreign exchange regulations and intelligence inputs. 

A balancing act? Global power rivalry over Iran challenges India’s foreign policy

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  A stable Iran is clearly in India’s interest. While US President Donald Trump has so far avoided a direct attack, the situation remains deeply uncertain. The central problem is that few governments take Trump’s words at face value. His actions have revealed a clear pattern: Washington targets adversaries even while pretending to negotiate with them.