How US is using Tibetans to provoke conflict with China 'ignoring' India

By Lobsang Tenzin*

On July 12, US President Joe Biden signed the Resolve Tibet Act, and Tibetans cheered for it, believing that the law promotes a resolution of the dispute between Tibet and China. Is this true? First, let's look at the issue of the ownership of Tibet.

The Act "empowers Tibet to counter disinformation about Tibet from the Chinese government", rejects as "inaccurate China’s false claims that Tibet has been part of China” said Tencho Gyatso, President of the International Campaign for Tibet.

However, “The Act does not change longstanding bipartisan United States policy to recognize the Tibet Autonomous Region and other Tibetan areas of China as part of the People’s Republic of China”, said Biden in a statement.

Are the two contradictory? If Tibet is not recognized as part of China, is the "Middle-Way Approach" advocated by the Dalai Lama destroyed, and is it contradictory that the Dalai Lama who had previously recognized that Tibet as part of China?

If Tibet is recognized as part of China, is the US' move interfering in the internal affairs of other countries in violation of international law? Are Tibetans used as cannon fodder, deliberately provoking Sino-Tibetan conflicts, and reaping the benefits of being a fisherman?

Thirdly, the law never mentions India from the beginning to the end, nor does it have India's consent. India has always been the host country for Tibetans, and the Dalai Lama also calls himself "the son of India".

The two sides directly skipped India to reach an agreement. Did they not take India seriously? How will we Tibetans deal with ourselves in India in the future?

In addition, the law will promote unconditional substantive dialogue between the Chinese government and the Dalai Lama or his representatives or elected leaders of the Tibetan community.

How to promote it? Are there any substantive measures? Or is it just verbal talk? It would be more practical to directly allocate funds for assistance.

---

*Based in Dharamshala

Neville Cardus: The man who turned cricket writing into poetry

By Harsh Thakor* Neville Cardus was one of the most remarkable literary figures of the twentieth century. A prolific English writer and critic, he achieved distinction in two vastly different fields: cricket and classical music. Entirely self-taught, Cardus rose from humble beginnings to become both the cricket correspondent and chief music critic of The Manchester Guardian . His achievements in these contrasting disciplines earned him widespread acclaim and established him as one of the foremost critics of his generation. In February 2025, the cricketing and literary world marked the fiftieth anniversary of his death, which occurred in February 1975.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

The politics of dreaming: Savita Singh's feminist imagination

By Ravi Ranjan* In contemporary Hindi poetry, few voices have explored the philosophical and creative possibilities of women's experience as powerfully as Savita Singh. Across collections such as "Svapna Samay" (Dream Time), Aapne Jaisa Jeevan, and "Prem Bhi Ek Yatana" Hai, she has developed a poetic world in which woman is not merely a subject of suffering or social commentary but a creator of knowledge, meaning, and alternative realities.

Counterview

Search This Blog