Skip to main content

Myanmar’s continuous breach of Bangladesh’s sovereignty belittling neighbourly spirit

By Samina Akhter* 

Myanmar is one of Bangladesh's closest neighbors. Unfortunately, the country's behavior is not good neighborly. On August 25, 2017, Myanmar's army raided the Rakhine state and carried out indiscriminate killings of the Rohingya population, setting fire to their homes. In the face of this brutality, more than 700,000 Rohingya fled and took shelter in Bangladesh. Several lakhs of Rohingyas have come to Bangladesh from Myanmar at different times before. At present, the number of Rohingyas registered in various refugee camps in Bangladesh is 1.25 million. Myanmar has been reluctant to take back these Rohingyas. Bangladesh has to pay the price. Myanmar has been deceiving Bangladesh in many ways.
Under the pretext of the ongoing conflict between the army and the Arakan Army, Myanmar has been strategically trying to expel the Rohingya from Rakhine. Rohingyas of several villages have already been ordered to leave the area. There is a fear of Rohingyas pouring into Bangladesh again. Such information has emerged in the reports of some Bangladeshi Bangla media which covers and monitors the conflict between the Myanmar Army and the Arakan Army. Those concerned say that effective action must be taken in this regard now, at least two lakh Rohingya will be deported again in the face of torture by the Myanmar army. And the destination of most of these Rohingyas will be Bangladesh. Bangladesh will have to face more crisis.
Accroding to media reports, 2 shells fired from Myanmar warplanes fell inside Bangladesh border. The incident took place on Saturday (September 3) at 9:30 am in the area between border pillars 40-41 under the jurisdiction of Reju Amtali BGB BOP of Ward No. 8 of Ghumdhum Union of Naikxyongchari Upazila of Bandarban.
Earlier, The Myanmar border security, Border Guard Police (BGP), reportedly hurled mortar shells at the Bangladesh-Myanmar border in Bandarban’s Naikhongchhari. The incident was reported from Tumbru no-man’s land on August 28 around 2pm.
A helicopter of the Myanmar Army on Tuesday reportedly crossed the Bangladesh border and fired multiple shells on the hills at Ghumdhum union in Bandarban's Naikhongchari upazila.
Myanmar has been continuously violating the sovereignty of Bangladesh now a days. This is very unexpected. No state has the right to violate the sovereignty of another state at the border. This is a clear violation of international law, norms, customs. The neighbourly relations between the two countries need to be taken into account by the authority of Myanmar. They have to understand that there is no war on the border. Arakan Army is their internal issue. It has right to do everything within its own jurisdiction. But it must remember that Bangladesh is a sovereign state. Shelling alone towards border intentionally or unintentionally cannot be the answer. Myanmar has not any right to violate another state’s jurisdiction. This type of attitude is not acceptable in international community.
According to local sources, 2 warplanes and 2 fighting helicopters of the Myanmar Army arrived between border pillars 40-41 under Reju Amtali BGB BOP at 9:30 am. At this time, approximately 8 to 10 rounds were fired from the warplanes and approximately 30 to 35 rounds were also fired from the helicopter. 2 shells fired from warplanes fell approximately 120 meters inside Bangladesh along Border Pillar 40.
Besides, Tumbru BGB BOP border pillar 34-35 of Ward No. 1 of Naikxyongchari Upazila fired 4 rounds of heavy weapons from Tumbru Right Camp of Myanmar 2 BGP which is still ongoing. Even the Myanmar Muringajhiri Camp and Tumbru Right Camp are being fired intermittently by mortar fire.
The fact that two mortar shells fired from Myanmar earlier landed within the border of Bangladesh is unexpected. It has been reported that two mortar shells hit a sleepy populated area of ​​Naikshyongchari upazila of Bandarban near Zero Point around 3 pm on Sunday. This spread panic among the locals. In this incident, Bangladesh protested by summoning the ambassador of Myanmar. It is not yet clear whether the mortar shelling was accidental or intentional. Local residents say that there has been shelling on the Myanmar border for several days. Despite the sound of gunfire and mortar shells ringing in the ears, it is hard to tell what is actually going on there. However, many residents of the area say that the Arakan Army has been fighting with the Myanmar army across the border in Rakhine state for more than two weeks. There was fierce fighting between the two sides from Sunday morning. At noon, Myanmar army helicopters and warplanes were seen circling the border. Meanwhile, there was a mortar shell incident on the border of Bangladesh. It should be noted that, a helicopter of the Myanmar security forces violated the airspace and returned to Bangladesh. The same thing happened time to time, day to day. The real cause of these incidents needs to be revealed quickly.
In this context, the incident of firing mortar shells by Myanmar inside the border of Bangladesh is exciting. For the sake of maintaining normal relations between the two countries, Myanmar should immediately take effective measures to stop all kinds of unwanted behavior from the border area - this is desirable.
Two mortar shells from Myanmar that landed on Bangladeshi soil on Sunday pose a threat to both Bangladesh's sovereignty and the bilateral relations between the two nations, where there has reportedly been intense combat between the Arakan Army and the Myanmar military. The tragedy portends poorly for the stability of the region as well as Bangladesh and Myanmar. On Sunday afternoon, the shells struck Naikhyangchari in Bandarban but did not explode, causing alarm among the villagers in the Tumbru Uttar Para border region.
The shells are said to have been defused by the Border Guard Bangladesh's bomb disposal team. Bangladesh has every right to be extremely concerned about this issue since it views the incident, whether it was deliberate or not, as a challenge to Bangladesh's sovereignty and as having the potential to worsen bilateral relations. More than a million Rohingyas have left the turmoil in Rakhine and entered Bangladesh during the previous forty years; more than 700,000 of them entered the country only in 2017. As a result, the relationship between the two nations has already remained tense.
Since the two nations signed agreements, first in November 2017 and then in January 2018, repatriation attempts have stalled, primarily due to the unwillingness of the Myanmar government and a tense situation in Myanmar.
The mortar shells that were fired on Sunday are the most recent instance of Myanmar's blatant disrespect for Bangladesh's sovereignty, its bilateral relations with Bangladesh, and regional peace. The Myanmar government is not yet known to have acknowledged the occurrence or made clear their viewpoint. Such disdain was also evident when, in August and September 2017, Myanmar helicopters repeatedly violated Bangladeshi airspace, to which the Bangladeshi government vigorously objected.
The persistence of these occurrences, however, points to Myanmar's ongoing violation of international law. Additionally, it runs counter to friendly neighborly relations and may result in unanticipated events that are not in the interests of just Myanmar but also Bangladesh and other nearby nations. An unstable Rakhine region poses a threat to the safe and honorable return of the Rohingya population, and an unstable border poses a threat to those who live there. A stable and peaceful neighbor is always desired and, in fact, essential for any country. In order to protect the interests of both countries as well as the international community, Bangladesh's government must protest to its colleagues in Myanmar and demand an explanation for the mortar shell incident.
If Bangladesh wants, it can destabilize the whole region by supporting the insurgents’ groups of Myanmar. But Bangladesh does not support any kind of insurgency, provocation in the region because it believes in peaceful coexistence of every actor in the region. Myanmar must respect this Bangladesh’s peaceful attitude, mindset and mechanism. Myanmar must have knowledge that Bangladesh has also strong military, modern military logistics, support from international community and opportunities to support the insurgents of Myanmar.
Border Guard Bangladesh (BGB) stepped up its vigilance along Bangladesh-Myanmar border in Bandarban area after two Myanmar mortar shells landed in an area near Tambru under Naikkhangchhari in Bandarban on Sunday afternoon.
State Minister for Foreign Affairs Md Shahriar Alam on Thursday said Bangladesh remains better prepared so that nobody can enter Bangladesh from Myanmar afresh due to deteriorated situation in Rakhine State.
Therefore, the Bangladeshi government strongly denounced the mortar shell event to the Myanmar government and must formally tell international and regional forums of both the most current and prior cases of international law violations. To make the locals feel comfortable, the government also strengthened security measures at the border between Bangladesh and Myanmar.
---
Dhaka-based columnist and woman and human rights activist

Comments

TRENDING

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

  By Rajiv Shah   This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.

Love letters in a lifelong war: Babusha Kohli’s resistance in verse

By Ravi Ranjan*  “War does not determine who is right—only who is left.” Bertrand Russell’s words echo hauntingly in our times, and few contemporary Hindi poets embody this truth as profoundly as Babusha Kohli. Emerging from Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Kohli has carved a unique space in literature by weaving together tenderness, protest, and philosophy across poetry, prose, and cinema. Her work is not merely artistic expression—it is resistance, refuge, and a call for peace.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Asbestos contamination in children’s products highlights global oversight gaps

By A Representative   A commentary published by the International Ban Asbestos Secretariat (IBAS) has drawn attention to the challenges governments face in responding effectively to global public-health risks. In an article written by Laurie Kazan-Allen and published on March 5, 2026, the author examines how the discovery of asbestos contamination in children’s play products has raised questions about regulatory oversight and international product safety. The article opens by reflecting on lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that governments in several countries were slow to respond to early warning signs of the crisis. Referring to the experience of the United Kingdom, the author writes that delays in implementing protective measures contributed to “232,112 recorded deaths and over a million people suffering from long Covid.” The commentary uses this example to illustrate what it describes as the dangers of underestimating emerging threats. Attention then turns...

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Echoes of Vietnam and Chile: The devastating cost of the I-A Axis in Iran

​ By Ram Puniyani  ​The recent joint military actions by Israel and the United States against Iran have been devastating. Like all wars, this conflict is brutal to its core, leaving a trail of human suffering in its wake. The stated pretext for this aggression—the brutality of the Ayatollah Khamenei regime and its nuclear ambitions—clashes sharply with the reality of the diplomatic landscape. Iran had expressed a willingness to remain at the negotiating table, signaling a readiness to concede points emerging from dialogue. 

Authoritarian destruction of the public sphere in Ecuador: Trumpism in action?

By Pilar Troya Fernández  The situation in Ecuador under Daniel Noboa's government is one of authoritarianism advancing on several fronts simultaneously to consolidate neoliberalism and total submission to the US international agenda. These are not isolated measures, but rather a coordinated strategy that combines job insecurity, the dismantling of the welfare state, unrestricted access to mining, the continuation of oil exploitation without environmental considerations, the centralization of power through the financial suffocation of local governments, and the systematic criminalization of all forms of opposition and popular organization.

The kitchen as prison: A feminist elegy for domestic slavery

By Garima Srivastava* Kumar Ambuj stands as one of the most incisive voices in contemporary Hindi poetry. His work, stripped of ornamentation, speaks directly to the lived realities of India’s marginalized—women, the rural poor, and those crushed under invisible forms of violence. His celebrated poem “Women Who Cook” (Khānā Banātī Striyāṃ) is not merely about food preparation; it is a searing indictment of patriarchal domestic structures that reduce women’s existence to endless, unpaid labour.

The price of silence: Why Modi won’t follow Shastri, appeal for sacrifice

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey*  ​In 1965, as India grappled with war and a crippling food crisis, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri faced a United States that used wheat shipments under the PL-480 agreement as a lever to dictate Indian foreign policy. Shastri’s response remains legendary: he appealed to the nation to skip one meal a day. Millions of middle-class households complied, choosing temporary hunger over the sacrifice of national dignity. Today, India faces a modern equivalent in the energy sector, yet the leadership’s response stands in stark contrast to that era of self-reliance.