Skip to main content

Migrant problem during Covid and the role of equality for cohesive development

By IMPRI Team 

The covid-19 pandemic has deepened the pre-existing inequalities across socio-economic groups, the distressing images of migrants’ exposure remained attached in our minds but not a lot has changed in terms of data collection and policy making since then to understand the role of equality for cohesive development. Cohesive development also means that human beings should respect the boundaries of nature which they cross at their own peril and the peril of other living beings on earth.
In lieu to this, The State of Development Discourses – #CohesiveDevelopment, #IMPRI Center for Human Dignity and Development (CHDD), #IMPRI Impact and Policy Research Institute, New Delhi organized #WebPolicyTalk with Prof Amiya Kumar Bagchi, on The Role of Equality for Cohesive Development. The session is inaugurated by Ms Mahima Kapoor, researcher and assistant editor at IMPRI. Ms Mahima Kapoor extended her gratitude to the speaker, moderator and the discussant.
The moderator for the event, Prof Sunil Ray, Former Director, A. N. Sinha Institute of Social Studies, Patna; Advisor, CDECS and IMPRI, is an academician with 35 years of experience in research and teaching in the field of environmental economics, political economy of development and rural development and institutional economics.
The discussants of the event are Dr Arup Kumar Sen, Associate Professor, Department of Commerce, Serampore College, Kolkata: Prof Atanu Sengupta, Professor, Department of Economics, The University of Burdwan, West Bengal, Dr Gopal Krishna, Guest Fellow, Faculty of Law, Humboldt University, Berlin; Fellow, IRGAC-Berlin and Dr Mansee Bal Bhargava, Entrepreneur, researcher, and educator; Former Executive Director at SaciWATERs.
Prof. Sunil Ray willinged that the discussion today might showcase the legacy of the works of Prof Bagchi. Prof Bagchi has pointed out that the state of differences of equality and inequality exists since long ago. From the very beginning people lived in communities and unfortunately they had to struggle against inequalities in the form of differences between men and women or between chief and others which has even increased more with the emergence of Civil society.
He criticized the thinkers such as Rousseau for focusing on equality among men only and not women. Further, He discussed the International Migration and Migrant crisis of Europe, US and African countries and its pragmatic condition for the last 10 years. He focused on the results of the protectionism condition and further entailed on the civil wars due to preference of their own men as rulers hence, International Organization should come up to save these people impacted with the civil wars and allow people to choose their rulers on their own so that civil wars won’t happen.
Prof. Sunil Ray had welcomed Prof Bagchi to righly elucidate the Rich exposure of the Kind of Game being Played on the name of democracy especially at imperialist forces. He reiterated if the power being played by Big corporations or international capital that mediates its interest through power structure is something which has been playing a habit to human life. So, the question comes here: Will Civilization Progress?
The Answer is actually “No” by Prof Ray. In India, Population of 40 crore is on migration and Vulnerable which is unfortunate for India as a developing country. Next, Prof Ray had focused on Power structure and opened the floor for discussants for the initiation of new ideas which will be helpful for new and young researchers as well.
Prof Atanu Sen Gupta, has focused on Health, as a part of cohesive development. The present pandemic has rightly pointed out the minimization and corporatization or hegemonization of the health sector. He further enlightened the ideas of Federick Engels on the condition of the working class in England that pondered the idea on how living standards bring a lot of health diseases and enshrines the idea of Malthus, Bismarckian and Jam Theory as well to compare the present situation. He supported the provision of Basic Provision by the state and collective participation in health management along with individual participation.
Further, Dr Arup Sen has supported the critiques made by Prof Bagchi on Geopolitics of development and trial for close connection between imperial policy and violence on the large number of people in different parts of world particularly, the middle east countries, africa and Central America. He thinks that there is racial dimension that is embedded in Bagchi’s Arguments. According to Dr. Seth, conceptualization of Development is development of the underdevelopment thesis of the famous Latin American Intellectual, Frank.
By supporting Frank’s idea, Dr. Arup Seth has focused on the socio-economic history of underdevelopment to conceptualize the theory of development. In the context of India, the development we are celebrating has an untold story. Over the past 50 years,around 60 million were uprooted from their soil o n the name of development projects and Time has come to interrogate the dominant paradigm of development.
Dr Mansee Bal Bhargawa meant that bringing imperialism in context will deviate us from cohesion development as it also means that Humanity should also respect boundaries of nature which they cross at their own perils or on the perils of other living beings on earth. She has rightly focused on the resorts of UN, OECD, etc and highlighted various pointers of Cop’26 in analysis and focusing on dynamics between migration and impacts of climate change.
In the Indian context, we deal by producing in excess and exporting to various imperialist and western countries and what we are receiving is uneducated people, poor human capital which is a kind of double loss in terms of climate change and humanitarian crisis. She supported having indexes such as the climate change index to check our status in contribution to climate change rather than just to blame the west and license ourselves to threaten the climate.
Dr Bhargawa has given the idea of “de-development” that the whole development discourse is actually deviating from climate change. She said that climate change has to be connector and somewhere a stabilizer of imperialism and with this we come in context of Why we are racing for development when human growth is reducing? Shouldn’t we focus more on change in the governance system? She has given a splendid way forwarding approach to keep a check on social fabric.
Dr Gopal Krishna has given his fruitful recommendations highlighting prof. Bagchi’s statement that the nobel prize given to Amartya Sen was a break two decades would break from a two decade world trend where only they were favored who favored private property and markets.
It was revered as a welcomed change but in recent times it is not actually. Tagging the prof Bagchi report, Dr. Gopal Krishna concluded that outrage which was inherent in his observation was that human beings are moral beings and migrants are human beings and they are also moral beings and so they can’t be treated as sub-human.
He referred to disasters creating refugees and stateless migrants. The structural faults create abnormal creation and migrant issues raise issues of equality and morality justice. He further envisioned that one human being equal to every other human being under no circumstances can be treated as “Subhuman” just because somebody is not a citizen or does not belong to the same party.
So, the judicial and legal imagination which is at present enveloping us doesn’t inspire actions as to how the state should treat people. We ought to engage with public institutions to ensure that human beings are treated in the framework of equality, morality, justice and fairness. He further explains how finance impacts migration and how the state responds to this.
Dr Gopal saw that biometric data leading to concentration camps while supporting historical episodes and hence, there is a need for an alternative paradigm of development, well being of humans and other species. There is a need for alternative organization, requiring naturalization and non-normalization of the unnatural and abnormal externalization of the environment and human cost.
Prof. Ray and Prof Bagchi have thanked Discussants for raising relevant issues. Prof. Bagchi stated that we have to recognize that the whole world except Cuba is ruled by capitalist and capitalist prime motive as Marx said is to accumulate and so we have to dislodge the power of capitalists and power of people who collaborate with them.
In our country, India, the greatest mistake we made was not to abolish landlording and no land reform except Jammu and Kashmir and Kerala. This company of landlords and capitalists ruled the country and they didn’t want their laborers to have freedom. Prof Bagchi had agreed to the points made by the discussants and had a brief review over them.
Prof Ray at the end concluded by supporting that the migrant problem is a crisis and human problem anywhere in the World but we need to concentrate on why the migrant crisis occurs and how we can counter this problem. There is always a power centrism which impacts only vulnerable people in case of calamities whether it is any natural calamity or climate change.Hence,we need to discuss these issues at international levels and counter structural problems associated.
At the end of session Prof Sunil Ray had extended a vote of thanks to the speaker and Discussants for this insightful session.
---
Acknowledgement: Priya Suman, Research intern at IMPRI

Comments

TRENDING

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

  By Rajiv Shah   This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.

Love letters in a lifelong war: Babusha Kohli’s resistance in verse

By Ravi Ranjan*  “War does not determine who is right—only who is left.” Bertrand Russell’s words echo hauntingly in our times, and few contemporary Hindi poets embody this truth as profoundly as Babusha Kohli. Emerging from Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Kohli has carved a unique space in literature by weaving together tenderness, protest, and philosophy across poetry, prose, and cinema. Her work is not merely artistic expression—it is resistance, refuge, and a call for peace.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Asbestos contamination in children’s products highlights global oversight gaps

By A Representative   A commentary published by the International Ban Asbestos Secretariat (IBAS) has drawn attention to the challenges governments face in responding effectively to global public-health risks. In an article written by Laurie Kazan-Allen and published on March 5, 2026, the author examines how the discovery of asbestos contamination in children’s play products has raised questions about regulatory oversight and international product safety. The article opens by reflecting on lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that governments in several countries were slow to respond to early warning signs of the crisis. Referring to the experience of the United Kingdom, the author writes that delays in implementing protective measures contributed to “232,112 recorded deaths and over a million people suffering from long Covid.” The commentary uses this example to illustrate what it describes as the dangers of underestimating emerging threats. Attention then turns...

Echoes of Vietnam and Chile: The devastating cost of the I-A Axis in Iran

​ By Ram Puniyani  ​The recent joint military actions by Israel and the United States against Iran have been devastating. Like all wars, this conflict is brutal to its core, leaving a trail of human suffering in its wake. The stated pretext for this aggression—the brutality of the Ayatollah Khamenei regime and its nuclear ambitions—clashes sharply with the reality of the diplomatic landscape. Iran had expressed a willingness to remain at the negotiating table, signaling a readiness to concede points emerging from dialogue. 

Authoritarian destruction of the public sphere in Ecuador: Trumpism in action?

By Pilar Troya Fernández  The situation in Ecuador under Daniel Noboa's government is one of authoritarianism advancing on several fronts simultaneously to consolidate neoliberalism and total submission to the US international agenda. These are not isolated measures, but rather a coordinated strategy that combines job insecurity, the dismantling of the welfare state, unrestricted access to mining, the continuation of oil exploitation without environmental considerations, the centralization of power through the financial suffocation of local governments, and the systematic criminalization of all forms of opposition and popular organization.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

The kitchen as prison: A feminist elegy for domestic slavery

By Garima Srivastava* Kumar Ambuj stands as one of the most incisive voices in contemporary Hindi poetry. His work, stripped of ornamentation, speaks directly to the lived realities of India’s marginalized—women, the rural poor, and those crushed under invisible forms of violence. His celebrated poem “Women Who Cook” (Khānā Banātī Striyāṃ) is not merely about food preparation; it is a searing indictment of patriarchal domestic structures that reduce women’s existence to endless, unpaid labour.

The price of silence: Why Modi won’t follow Shastri, appeal for sacrifice

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey*  ​In 1965, as India grappled with war and a crippling food crisis, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri faced a United States that used wheat shipments under the PL-480 agreement as a lever to dictate Indian foreign policy. Shastri’s response remains legendary: he appealed to the nation to skip one meal a day. Millions of middle-class households complied, choosing temporary hunger over the sacrifice of national dignity. Today, India faces a modern equivalent in the energy sector, yet the leadership’s response stands in stark contrast to that era of self-reliance.