Skip to main content

Hijab issue raised by those wanting obedient daughter, submissive sister, sanskari bahu

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*

The incidents happening in the southern part of Karnataka are deeply distressing and need to be resolved at the earliest. Unfortunately, rather than resolving the issue, the current regime has wanted to escalate it further, and as its modus operandi, the ruling party has encouraged students to counter demand of the Muslim girls wearing Hijab by offering saffron scarves.
Friends were converted into foes in a short span of time, as those who want to reap the benefits of division are determined to have their way. This is bound to happen when those who have least respect for the Constitution and for an inclusive nationalist movement, encourage people towards divisive politics, as it has ‘paid’ them full dividends. The Right to Education (RTE) is meant for all, irrespective of faith and choice of clothes.irr
On one hand, Hindutva protagonists want Hindu women to follow ‘tradition’, glamorizing all the symbols of regression as ‘culture’, blaming ‘western’ influence on our culture, beating up and harassing women wearing jeans or T-shirts. On the other, many of those who do it sit in the western world trolling women who speak for themselves in the most vulgar and filthy language.
Their ideal woman, in their view, is the one who multitasks, who should be an ‘obedient’ daughter, a submissive sister, a ‘sanskari’ bahu, and a mother-in-law who harasses the daughter in law for the sake of her son.
Oppression within Hindu society not their agenda. They don't talk about women dying of dowry, untouchability and caste discrimination. Their heart does not sink when female infanticide takes place and when women at young age are molested and harassed. All this has never been the Sangh Parivar agenda. The only agenda they have is to find holes in the Muslim and Christian social-cultural systems.
While the issue of hijab and veils is important, that should emerge from the Muslim community. Like sindoor and mangalsutra being worn by Hindu women as their identity, Muslim women use hijab as identity.
When a community is pushed to isolation, right-wing regressive forces emerge. Hijab was defended by a girl who can speak as boldly as anyone. Keeping her head high, she was seen driving a two wheeler as confidently as anyone.
Sikhs wear turban and kripan which is part of their culture. There are many societies in the western world, where issues of identities have been challenged through a new ‘national’ identity but it is always a complex issue. France is facing this at the moment. UK and USA grappled with the issue, but they mixed hijab with Burqa.
The hijab issue can be resolved if voices emerge from within the community. It is not that the community does not change, but when "outsiders" determinedly harass and embarrass the community to do away with it, it turns into its religious right.
The Karantaka government must not allow it to escalate as a Hindu-Muslim issue. It must allow girls to attend classes as usual. India will be best governed through a secular Constitution when those responsible for rule of law and Constitution are impartial and committed to their core values. Propagating deeply orthodox Brahminical values while opposing other religious practices is pure hypocrisy.
Those who claim that the burqa issue is another Shahbano case must remember that it was imposed all of a sudden on the Muslim girls. They should decide whether our state-funded schools and colleges should remain absolutely secular without allowing any core value of any religion to be promoted. Converting government schools into a den of Brahminical cultural practices and then preaching ‘morality’ of ‘modernism’ is absolute hypocrisy.
One knows who is behind this and what is their aimed. The situation in Uttar Pradesh is becoming difficult, hence every effort is being made to create this crisis as an opportunity to vilify the community and blame all those who speak for their rights as anti-national.
It is time the Supreme Court takes a suo motu cognizance of it and defend the rights of these girls. It should either ban all kind of religious symbols in government schools or fix up a minimum code of conduct so that no one is punished because of identity or cultural practices.
Shouting Jai Shri Ram or Allaho Akbar to fight and harass each other won't help. One hopes school authorities and the Karnataka government will ensure that no untoward incident happens.
Surely, protests by the boys and girls against Hijab are not spontaneous and there are forces behind them. Nothing will happen to those in power, as they have decided to bring these issues to gain politically. Hence, only the Supreme Court can bring order to what is happening. But will it act?
---
*Human rights defender. Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/vbrawat; twitter: @freetohumanity

Comments

AdhikariH said…
Mr. Rawat's argument is absolutely justifiable. Before 42nd amendment of our constitution in 1976, India was not a secular nation. But all religious groups usually followed their very own religious practices or 'cultures'. There was rarely any conflict or debate on religious practice issue. Now we live in a highly politicalized society where politics for pill gain get priority. Anyway, according to the 'Right to Education' no one can be victim in education in religious grounds. Then why Madrassah Education system till exists. Is it not a bad system of making a difference Muslim from others? Can we support this discrimination?

TRENDING

The golden crop: How turmeric is transforming women's lives in tribal India

By Vikas Meshram*   When the lush green fields of turmeric sway in the tribal belt of southern Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, and Gujarat, it is not merely a spice crop — it is the golden glow of self-reliance. In villages where even basic spices once had to be bought from the market, the very soil today is yielding a prosperity that has transformed the lives of thousands of families. At the heart of this transformation is the initiative of Vaagdhara, which has linked turmeric with livelihoods, nutrition, and village self-governance — gram swaraj.

Love letters in a lifelong war: Babusha Kohli’s resistance in verse

By Ravi Ranjan*  “War does not determine who is right—only who is left.” Bertrand Russell’s words echo hauntingly in our times, and few contemporary Hindi poets embody this truth as profoundly as Babusha Kohli. Emerging from Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Kohli has carved a unique space in literature by weaving together tenderness, protest, and philosophy across poetry, prose, and cinema. Her work is not merely artistic expression—it is resistance, refuge, and a call for peace.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Authoritarian destruction of the public sphere in Ecuador: Trumpism in action?

By Pilar Troya Fernández  The situation in Ecuador under Daniel Noboa's government is one of authoritarianism advancing on several fronts simultaneously to consolidate neoliberalism and total submission to the US international agenda. These are not isolated measures, but rather a coordinated strategy that combines job insecurity, the dismantling of the welfare state, unrestricted access to mining, the continuation of oil exploitation without environmental considerations, the centralization of power through the financial suffocation of local governments, and the systematic criminalization of all forms of opposition and popular organization.

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

  By Rajiv Shah   This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.

Echoes of Vietnam and Chile: The devastating cost of the I-A Axis in Iran

​ By Ram Puniyani  ​The recent joint military actions by Israel and the United States against Iran have been devastating. Like all wars, this conflict is brutal to its core, leaving a trail of human suffering in its wake. The stated pretext for this aggression—the brutality of the Ayatollah Khamenei regime and its nuclear ambitions—clashes sharply with the reality of the diplomatic landscape. Iran had expressed a willingness to remain at the negotiating table, signaling a readiness to concede points emerging from dialogue. 

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

The price of silence: Why Modi won’t follow Shastri, appeal for sacrifice

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey*  ​In 1965, as India grappled with war and a crippling food crisis, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri faced a United States that used wheat shipments under the PL-480 agreement as a lever to dictate Indian foreign policy. Shastri’s response remains legendary: he appealed to the nation to skip one meal a day. Millions of middle-class households complied, choosing temporary hunger over the sacrifice of national dignity. Today, India faces a modern equivalent in the energy sector, yet the leadership’s response stands in stark contrast to that era of self-reliance.

False claim? What Venezuela is witnessing is not surrender but a tactical retreat

By Manolo De Los Santos  The early morning hours of January 3, 2026, marked an inflection point in Venezuela and Latin America’s centuries-long struggle for self-determination and independence. Operation Absolute Resolve, ordered by the Trump administration, constituted the most brutal and direct military assault on a sovereign state in the region in recent memory. In a shocking operation that left hundreds dead, President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores were illegally kidnapped from Venezuelan soil and transported to the United States, where they now face fabricated charges in a New York federal detention facility. In the two months since this act of war, a torrent of speculation has emerged from so-called experts and pundits across the political spectrum. This has followed three main lines: One . The operation’s success indicated treason at the highest levels of the Bolivarian Revolution. Two . Acting President Delcy Rodríguez and the remaining leadership have abandone...