Skip to main content

There’s nothing romantic about talk of welfare state; it’s actually nightmare


By Someshwar Nayak*
It is time one talked about social welfare. Social welfare according to most of the people is like magic trick played by state; but to be precise there is nothing like social welfare, social welfare is most illogical and faulty concept which people all across the globe ever came in touch with. Contagiousness of such concepts are a matter of concern; because growing youth and dormant people are their prime target, which covers most of the population and plethora of human resources.
Such concepts are insanely dangerous because it drives people to grow sapling of slavery which eventually end up taking form of giant lurky oak with several poisonous limbs. Later on such limbs are the one and solely reason why we face state of chaos and miseries, like we have already seen what happened during the collapse of centrally planned state like Soviet Union and Eastern European economies in early 1990s.
James Buchanan who won Nobel in Economics Science talked about one robust term which was apart from so called conventional term called ‘market failure’. He talked about something called ‘government failure’, he further said that government composed allocations of resources are not perfectly efficient either. His precise insight was that democratic political systems create their own inevitable externalities and some people can use the system to impose costs on other.
Precise observation of what Buchanan is saying is that there’s nothing like state as benevolent lord of the individuals, there’s nothing like welfare state and welfare only applies to individuals not to groups. He was well aware of what welfare state is and our hope is to make every single individual awake of what welfare state romance is all about.
Even if we will talk about well respected Economist like Adam Smith then we can observe that he clearly assigned the duties of sovereign in his book, “An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations”. He clearly writes that the sovereign has only three duties to attend: first, the duty of protecting the society from violence; second, the duty to protect every member of society from injustice and oppression of every other member of it; third, the duty of maintaining certain public institutions and certain public works.
So thinking of state as welfare state is nothing more or less than idiocy of each and every individual because it is the way to take individual rights away. It is coercive force which takes all our liberty and freedom; which in turn end up hurting one individual to feed gain to other.
Even what French Economist Frederic Bastiat said drives us toward individual rights we recieve from nature, he basically said that in spite of the cunning of artful political leaders; individuality, liberty, property are three gifts from God precede all human legislation and are superior to it. And we are well aware that in social welfare such godly gifts are taken away by honouring state as the name of God.
Social welfare is always faulty because it romanticize the reality, we can’t create God like bodies which can compose something called paradise. As Milton Friedman very robustly said there’s no paradise. People who romanticize state are insanely unaware of concept of individuality and concept of self interest. State too are driven by self interest force; but in more pathetic fashion.
Harsh truth is that social welfare is highly immoral bulldozing force that cheats people on the name of so called welfare, if we really concerned about people then it will be really good if we start thinking in terms of individual as soon as possible. Genesis of thinking in terms of individual will be the only coordinate when well-being and prosperity will start peeping into the soul of the individuals; which in turn will lead to the well-being and prosperity of nation.
The points basically we are discussing is that there’s nothing like lord or guardian state who will create paradise for individuals, it is quite logical to think that what kind of paradise they are talking about by taking our rights away; on one place they are taking our individual rights and on other they are blabbering about welfare. This doesn’t need any complex economic calculations but instead we just need simple and basic logic to understand.
That’s why problem is not in its complexity but problem is that people talk about stuffs but they don’t even analyze how misleading the whole idea is about; critical thinking is scarce and tons of nonsense is floating all around the globe and people are romantically consuming it.
Again ending my value with the observation that social welfare is most illogical and faulty concept, we need to make everyone aware of what state is doing to take our individual rights away. We need to stop people; not forcefully but by making aware that the romantic dreams they are consuming about state is not romantic dreams at all; it is a big nightmare!

*Economics graduate, University of Delhi

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

  By Rajiv Shah   This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.

Love letters in a lifelong war: Babusha Kohli’s resistance in verse

By Ravi Ranjan*  “War does not determine who is right—only who is left.” Bertrand Russell’s words echo hauntingly in our times, and few contemporary Hindi poets embody this truth as profoundly as Babusha Kohli. Emerging from Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Kohli has carved a unique space in literature by weaving together tenderness, protest, and philosophy across poetry, prose, and cinema. Her work is not merely artistic expression—it is resistance, refuge, and a call for peace.

Authoritarian destruction of the public sphere in Ecuador: Trumpism in action?

By Pilar Troya Fernández  The situation in Ecuador under Daniel Noboa's government is one of authoritarianism advancing on several fronts simultaneously to consolidate neoliberalism and total submission to the US international agenda. These are not isolated measures, but rather a coordinated strategy that combines job insecurity, the dismantling of the welfare state, unrestricted access to mining, the continuation of oil exploitation without environmental considerations, the centralization of power through the financial suffocation of local governments, and the systematic criminalization of all forms of opposition and popular organization.

The golden crop: How turmeric is transforming women's lives in tribal India

By Vikas Meshram*   When the lush green fields of turmeric sway in the tribal belt of southern Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, and Gujarat, it is not merely a spice crop — it is the golden glow of self-reliance. In villages where even basic spices once had to be bought from the market, the very soil today is yielding a prosperity that has transformed the lives of thousands of families. At the heart of this transformation is the initiative of Vaagdhara, which has linked turmeric with livelihoods, nutrition, and village self-governance — gram swaraj.

Echoes of Vietnam and Chile: The devastating cost of the I-A Axis in Iran

​ By Ram Puniyani  ​The recent joint military actions by Israel and the United States against Iran have been devastating. Like all wars, this conflict is brutal to its core, leaving a trail of human suffering in its wake. The stated pretext for this aggression—the brutality of the Ayatollah Khamenei regime and its nuclear ambitions—clashes sharply with the reality of the diplomatic landscape. Iran had expressed a willingness to remain at the negotiating table, signaling a readiness to concede points emerging from dialogue. 

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

The price of silence: Why Modi won’t follow Shastri, appeal for sacrifice

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey*  ​In 1965, as India grappled with war and a crippling food crisis, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri faced a United States that used wheat shipments under the PL-480 agreement as a lever to dictate Indian foreign policy. Shastri’s response remains legendary: he appealed to the nation to skip one meal a day. Millions of middle-class households complied, choosing temporary hunger over the sacrifice of national dignity. Today, India faces a modern equivalent in the energy sector, yet the leadership’s response stands in stark contrast to that era of self-reliance.

False claim? What Venezuela is witnessing is not surrender but a tactical retreat

By Manolo De Los Santos  The early morning hours of January 3, 2026, marked an inflection point in Venezuela and Latin America’s centuries-long struggle for self-determination and independence. Operation Absolute Resolve, ordered by the Trump administration, constituted the most brutal and direct military assault on a sovereign state in the region in recent memory. In a shocking operation that left hundreds dead, President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores were illegally kidnapped from Venezuelan soil and transported to the United States, where they now face fabricated charges in a New York federal detention facility. In the two months since this act of war, a torrent of speculation has emerged from so-called experts and pundits across the political spectrum. This has followed three main lines: One . The operation’s success indicated treason at the highest levels of the Bolivarian Revolution. Two . Acting President Delcy Rodríguez and the remaining leadership have abandone...