Skip to main content

Bureaucrats in India, China fail to convince politicians about natural resource abuse

By Shankar Sharma*

This line of thinking, as suggested in the following links, can be said to be very unfortunate and disastrous for the humanity: China urges developed countries to take the lead in cutting out coal; There’s an $80-billion hole in India’s climate pledge; After Glasgow, world needs urgent action to stave off catastrophe; and Sixty years of climate change warnings: the signs that were missed (and ignored).
The two of the largest, densely populous and highest polluters, India and China, seem to have commonality at least on such irresponsible line of thinking.
Have the bloated bureaucracy in these two counties failed to convince their political leaders that the level of fossil fuel burning as we seem them today, which can only increase exponentially in a BAU scenario, and the larger threats of Climate Change will devastate every section of our own people much before impacting the rich countries? The inevitability of the calamitous abuse of our natural resources because of the ever growing demand for fossil fuels should have been crystal clear to them by this time. Is it acceptable to the bureaucracy and political leaders that such continued abuse of nature will not only make our people much more impoverished in the short-term, but will also aggravate Climate Change/climate emergency/global warming?
Is it that the pollution /contamination of air, water and soil across the length and breadth of the two countries, which is invariably linked to enormous number of industrial /commercial activities to over-exploit the conventional energy technologies and fossil fuels, as being highlighted by Delhi/Beijing air pollution and health concerns, are not evident to them?
The rich countries also may have larger resource base, lower population and money to face Climate Change. They may also have lesser risks from CC.
In such a scenario shall we rely on the money from those rich countries to protect our own interests? Can our bureaucracy confidently state that our societies in general, and the governments in particular, have honestly done all that is feasible to meet the legitimate needs for energy of all sections of our societies, and to uplift them from the clutches of poverty with the resources made available to our country during the last 70 years?
Has the efficiency level of harnessing /utilising various forms of energy in our countries achieved a level which is comparable to the best in the world; how much is the potential of such energy efficiency gains feasible with our existing energy infrastructure?
Unless we seek honest and credible answer to these questions, it will be foolhardy to expect rich countries to do anything more than what we want to do; irrespective of the fact as to who is primarily responsible for the mess we are in. Such an expectation/demand from rich countries may appear legitimate in the international fora, but no one else is going to protect the primary interests of our people that our own governments.
Such expectations, are very much similar to scenario wherein India may seeking reparations running to Trillions of British Pounds for the loss and damage they have heaped on our people during the illegal occupation of our land for more than 200 years. Such a thing will never happen.
Let us honestly do all that is feasible within our own country first, while continuing to put pressure on rich/ polluter countries to provide compensation to the poor countries. We must not wait for the aid to come from outside for us to start doing anything or everything feasible.

*Power & Climate Policy Analyst, Vijayanagar 1st stage, Sagara, Karnataka

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Hoping against despair after Myanmar President’s visit to India

By Nava Thakuria  Myanmar President U Min Aung Hlaing’s five-day official visit to India from 30 May to 3 June 2026 drew attention both in New Delhi and in India’s northeastern region, where policymakers and residents closely follow developments in the neighbouring country. The visit was significant because it touched on several issues of mutual concern, including security cooperation, border management, connectivity projects, trade, and regional stability.

Beyond data: The economist who refused to remain in the ivory tower

By Vikas Meshram   There are few people who are born into privilege yet choose to dedicate their lives to the cause of the poor. Jean Drèze is one such individual. Born on January 22, 1959, in Leuven, Belgium, into the family of a distinguished economist, Drèze has become one of the most influential voices in the study of poverty, inequality, and social policy in India. Having lived in India since 1979, he adopted Indian citizenship in 2002 and has since played a pivotal role in shaping some of the country's most important welfare initiatives.