Skip to main content

Did President clarify from Finance Ministry why his salary is deducted disproportionately?

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* 

What does one make of a situation when the first citizen of the country 'feels' helpless because of income tax deduction on his salary? President Ram Nath Kovind must be getting Rs 5 lakh per month as salary, but at a public meeting organised at his birth place, he said that over Rs 2.75 lakh per month get deducted from it. He complained that a local teacher is getting more salary than him, and so do government bureaucrats.
I am sure if President Kovind knew that teachers and bureaucrats get tax deduction, though none of them get the luxury which is enjoyed by the President of India. One does not know why the President was feeling so bad, especially when his salary is absolutely tax free. It is time for our 'able' Finance Minister to explain to the nation as why are they deducting more amount from the salary of our poor Rashtrapatiji.
It is a shocking statement to say the least. One, the President's office has luxuries attached to it, apart from perks and facilities. Even after retirement , he would be getting a decent salary, including a luxurious house and one assistant. I have never heard any past President of India speak about his or her salary, which were never a matter of concern.
The President is the custodian of our rights. He should encourage us to pay tax, but it is also important that, if a person, whose salary and perks are income tax free, is part of a campaign, it should be termed hypocritical. When the President speaks to people and complains that he does not get anything special and that a college teacher or a sarkari babu gets more than him, he is generalising things. 
He should remember, teachers are not paid for certain government duties for which they are used. Secondly, even in universities, things are not the same everywhere. Thirdly, I am sure, teachers are not getting 'tax free' salary, nor do they enjoy any power and perks.
During the President's visit to his hometown, he went by a 'special' train provided by Indian Railways. Teachers must book their tickets much in advance and have to pay for any travel. I am not sure if the Railways charged money from the Rashtrapati Bhavan. Worse, the security protocol of the President in Kanpur reportedly led to two deaths. One child died and got crushed and another woman, who was suffering from post-Covid complications, could not reach hospital because of traffic diversions and stoppage, as President's motorcade was passing by. VIP culture in India remains powerful and reminds all of us 'hamari aukat kya hai'.
Police officials, of course, apologised to the person whose child got killed, but is this apology enough? Importantly, it is officials who have to pay the price of such happenings. After all, protocols are created by officials under the guidance of the top leadership. Shouldn't the President's office speak out? How many of us have the luxury of moving and stopping traffic at will?
President Kovind should not worry about his salary. He must seek clarification from the Finance Ministry as to why, if at all, his salary was being deducted disproportionately, i.e. more than 50% of his earnings. Income tax rates in India are not so high; and why should the President pay more? There is no need for the President to justify his tax deductions which actually should never happen, nor should he make us feel that he is an ordinary citizen. He is the President of India and the first citizen and should get whatever luxuries, power, prestige, perks he is entitled to.
One only wishes him to be the custodian of our rights and our Constitution drafted by Baba Saheb Ambedkar
One only wishes him to be the custodian of our rights and our Constitution drafted by Baba Saheb Ambedkar. I have not seen the President speak much about Baba Saheb. I just want to remind him how President Giani Zail Singh and President KR Narayanan functioned in their offices. Both these Presidents gave a new meaning to their office.
Giani Zail Singh took on the might of Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi who was not consulting him. Gianiji showed Rajiv the mirror: that the President has enough power to dismiss him. President KR Narayanan protected our Constitution and its secular values. He did not sign on the dotted lines of the government of Atal Bihari Vajpayee. Narayanan returned the order which wanted to impose President's rule in Uttar Pradesh. He reminded the government time and again about its constitutional duties much to the discomfort of the then ruling party.
Hope President Kovind enjoyed this trip to his native place. Uttar Pradesh is going to polls early next year, and the Rashtrapatiji has a lot to do o protect the Constitutional rights and political freedom in the State.
Hope the President will act whenever there is an attempt to throttle the rights of the people as he has the shining example of President KR Narayanan reminding the government to follow Constitutional path and protect rights of the people.
---
*Human rights defender. Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/vbrawat. Twitter: @freetohumanity

Comments

TRENDING

From algorithms to exploitation: New report exposes plight of India's gig workers

By Jag Jivan   The recent report, "State of Finance in India Report 2024-25," released by a coalition including the Centre for Financial Accountability, Focus on the Global South, and other organizations, paints a stark picture of India's burgeoning digital economy, particularly highlighting the exploitation faced by gig workers on platform-based services. 

'Condonation of war crimes against women and children’: IPSN on Trump’s Gaza Board

By A Representative   The India-Palestine Solidarity Network (IPSN) has strongly condemned the announcement of a proposed “Board of Peace” for Gaza and Palestine by former US President Donald J. Trump, calling it an initiative that “condones war crimes against children and women” and “rubs salt in Palestinian wounds.”

Gig workers hold online strike on republic day; nationwide protests planned on February 3

By A Representative   Gig and platform service workers across the country observed a nationwide online strike on Republic Day, responding to a call given by the Gig & Platform Service Workers Union (GIPSWU) to protest what it described as exploitation, insecurity and denial of basic worker rights in the platform economy. The union said women gig workers led the January 26 action by switching off their work apps as a mark of protest.

India’s road to sustainability: Why alternative fuels matter beyond electric vehicles

By Suyash Gupta*  India’s worsening air quality makes the shift towards clean mobility urgent. However, while electric vehicles (EVs) are central to India’s strategy, they alone cannot address the country’s diverse pollution and energy challenges.

Jayanthi Natarajan "never stood by tribals' rights" in MNC Vedanta's move to mine Niyamigiri Hills in Odisha

By A Representative The Odisha Chapter of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity (CSD), which played a vital role in the struggle for the enactment of historic Forest Rights Act, 2006 has blamed former Union environment minister Jaynaynthi Natarjan for failing to play any vital role to defend the tribals' rights in the forest areas during her tenure under the former UPA government. Countering her recent statement that she rejected environmental clearance to Vendanta, the top UK-based NMC, despite tremendous pressure from her colleagues in Cabinet and huge criticism from industry, and the claim that her decision was “upheld by the Supreme Court”, the CSD said this is simply not true, and actually she "disrespected" FRA.

Stands 'exposed': Cavalier attitude towards rushed construction of Char Dham project

By Bharat Dogra*  The nation heaved a big sigh of relief when the 41 workers trapped in the under-construction Silkyara-Barkot tunnel (Uttarkashi district of Uttarakhand) were finally rescued on November 28 after a 17-day rescue effort. All those involved in the rescue effort deserve a big thanks of the entire country. The government deserves appreciation for providing all-round support.

Whither space for the marginalised in Kerala's privately-driven townships after landslides?

By Ipshita Basu, Sudheesh R.C.  In the early hours of July 30 2024, a landslide in the Wayanad district of Kerala state, India, killed 400 people. The Punjirimattom, Mundakkai, Vellarimala and Chooralmala villages in the Western Ghats mountain range turned into a dystopian rubble of uprooted trees and debris.

Over 40% of gig workers earn below ₹15,000 a month: Economic Survey

By A Representative   The Finance Minister, Nirmala Sitharaman, while reviewing the Economic Survey in Parliament on Tuesday, highlighted the rapid growth of gig and platform workers in India. According to the Survey, the number of gig workers has increased from 7.7 million to around 12 million, marking a growth of about 55 percent. Their share in the overall workforce is projected to rise from 2 percent to 6.7 percent, with gig workers expected to contribute approximately ₹2.35 lakh crore to the GDP by 2030. The Survey also noted that over 40 percent of gig workers earn less than ₹15,000 per month.

Fragmented opposition and identity politics shaping Tamil Nadu’s 2026 election battle

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  Tamil Nadu is set to go to the polls in April 2026, and the political battle lines are beginning to take shape. Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to the state on January 23, 2026, marked the formal launch of the Bharatiya Janata Party’s campaign against the ruling Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK). Addressing multiple public meetings, the Prime Minister accused the DMK government of corruption, criminality, and dynastic politics, and called for Tamil Nadu to be “freed from DMK’s chains.” PM Modi alleged that the DMK had turned Tamil Nadu into a drug-ridden state and betrayed public trust by governing through what he described as “Corruption, Mafia and Crime,” derisively terming it “CMC rule.” He claimed that despite making numerous promises, the DMK had failed to deliver meaningful development. He also targeted what he described as the party’s dynastic character, arguing that the government functioned primarily for the benefit of a single family a...