Skip to main content

Gujarat 'ignores' 2002 riots anniversary. Only exception: Jamaat-sponsored webinar


A JIH-supported rehabilitation colony
By Mahesh Trivedi* 
The 19th anniversary of the 2002 Hindu-Muslim riots that tarnished the image of Gujarat passed off almost unnoticed on February 28. No mention of the bloody anti-Muslim pogrom was made even in the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-ruled state’s mainstream media. Ironically, it was left to the Jamaat-e-Islami Hind (JIH) to pay tributes in its own way to the riots victims and survivors. 
Speakers at a JIH webinar blamed the state government for its lackadaisical attitude toward the affected Muslims, who they said are leading a dog’s life and ploughing their own furrow even after almost two decades.
As many as 19 years have gone by since some 2,000 men, women and children, mostly Muslims, were killed and about 200,000 people were rendered homeless in the savage clashes that also saw destruction of 302 dargahs, 209 mosques and 13 madrasas, not to mention loss of property worth Rs 2.44 billion for the minority community, all this under the watch of the then Chief Minister Narendra Modi, who is now the Prime Minister.
While the BJP-controlled Gujarat government has not stirred a finger to frame even a rehabilitation policy for the riot-ravaged people, JIH, through NGOs like the Islamic Relief Committee Gujarat, is known to have have played a major role in their re-establishment, spending almost Rs 40 million for victims of the riots, building 1,321 new homes and repairing 4,946 damaged ones.
JIH, which claims to have helped 3,500 dirt-poor, displaced families living in subhuman conditions in tumbledown temporary shelters at 83 ill-equipped relief colonies, sponsored a webinar on the Gujarat riots anniversary participated by rights activists and community leaders in order to “brainstorm” on the plight of not only the riot-hit but all the six million Muslims in Modi’s homeland.
Titled “Let’s struggle for peace, justice and communal harmony”, hosted by Vaseef Hussain, secretary, National and Community Affairs, JIH Gujarat, the webinar saw Muhammad Shafi Madni, JIH national secretary, stating that fact-finding reports on the riots had exposed the real, political motive behind triggering the communal clashes, adding, the state government, instead of lending a helping hand to those affected by the wanton violence, sympathised with the predators, and also created hurdles in the path of the do-gooders engaged in relief work.
“Jamaat-e-Islami Hind and many other voluntary organisations strained their every nerve to establish and maintain peace and brotherhood but those who are responsible for law and order are out to shatter communal amity,” he asserted.
Muhammad Sharif Malik, co-convener of Alpasankhyak Adhikar Manch (Minority Rights Forum), revealed that even after 2002 riots, communal incidents have not stopped but their nature and pattern have changed with the result that only the Constitution can offer protection to Muslims.
He said the Manch’s fact-finding missions have revealed that while the 2002 riots were on a large scale in terms of their geographical expanse and losses in terms of property and lives, subsequent riots had been sub-radar on a smaller scale, adding that the recurrence of “small-scale riots” had led to “rapid polarisation of society along religious lines.
Anand Yagnik, Vaseef Hussain
Human rights lawyer Govind Parmar felt that these were dangerous times and hence more and more programmes focussing on communal amity were the need of the hour to establish a secular society.
Laying stress on united efforts to establish peace, Mujahid Nafees, convener, Minority Coordination Committee, Gujarat, opined that the ruling party was responsible for maintaining peace and harmony but, unfortunately, the same people were adept at fishing in troubled waters.
Said senior Gujarat High Court advocate Anand Yagnik: “I am ready to fight the cases of the riot-affected people. Being a Hindu, I apologise to the Muslims who went through hell during the 2002 riots. However, riots have not stopped but continue in the form of attacks on institutions who work by strictly abiding by the Constitution.”
Giving an example of harassment of even judges, he said, the Karnataka High Court’s Justice Jayant Patel, under whose supervision the CBI had filed a chargesheet in the Ishrat Jahan case, claiming that top Intelligence Bureau and Gujarat Police officials were involved, was sidelined and had to resign in a huff.
He also said that Justice Akil Kureshi who had in 2010 remitted Union Home Minister Amit Shah to police custody for two days in the Sohrabuddin case, was also never promoted.
Tanveer Jafri, son of former Congress MP Ehsan Jafri who was killed by Hindu rioters during the 2002 riots, said that India had remained secular because of its educated citizens who were also secular-minded, adding that time was ripe for the Muslim community to launch an education movement.
He held out a warning that if education was neglected, Muslims in Gujarat would face the same fate as that of Myanmar’s Rohingyas.
---
Senior Ahmedabad-based journalist. A version of this report was earlier published in India Tomorrow

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

  By Rajiv Shah   This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.

Love letters in a lifelong war: Babusha Kohli’s resistance in verse

By Ravi Ranjan*  “War does not determine who is right—only who is left.” Bertrand Russell’s words echo hauntingly in our times, and few contemporary Hindi poets embody this truth as profoundly as Babusha Kohli. Emerging from Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Kohli has carved a unique space in literature by weaving together tenderness, protest, and philosophy across poetry, prose, and cinema. Her work is not merely artistic expression—it is resistance, refuge, and a call for peace.

Authoritarian destruction of the public sphere in Ecuador: Trumpism in action?

By Pilar Troya Fernández  The situation in Ecuador under Daniel Noboa's government is one of authoritarianism advancing on several fronts simultaneously to consolidate neoliberalism and total submission to the US international agenda. These are not isolated measures, but rather a coordinated strategy that combines job insecurity, the dismantling of the welfare state, unrestricted access to mining, the continuation of oil exploitation without environmental considerations, the centralization of power through the financial suffocation of local governments, and the systematic criminalization of all forms of opposition and popular organization.

The golden crop: How turmeric is transforming women's lives in tribal India

By Vikas Meshram*   When the lush green fields of turmeric sway in the tribal belt of southern Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, and Gujarat, it is not merely a spice crop — it is the golden glow of self-reliance. In villages where even basic spices once had to be bought from the market, the very soil today is yielding a prosperity that has transformed the lives of thousands of families. At the heart of this transformation is the initiative of Vaagdhara, which has linked turmeric with livelihoods, nutrition, and village self-governance — gram swaraj.

Echoes of Vietnam and Chile: The devastating cost of the I-A Axis in Iran

​ By Ram Puniyani  ​The recent joint military actions by Israel and the United States against Iran have been devastating. Like all wars, this conflict is brutal to its core, leaving a trail of human suffering in its wake. The stated pretext for this aggression—the brutality of the Ayatollah Khamenei regime and its nuclear ambitions—clashes sharply with the reality of the diplomatic landscape. Iran had expressed a willingness to remain at the negotiating table, signaling a readiness to concede points emerging from dialogue. 

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

The price of silence: Why Modi won’t follow Shastri, appeal for sacrifice

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey*  ​In 1965, as India grappled with war and a crippling food crisis, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri faced a United States that used wheat shipments under the PL-480 agreement as a lever to dictate Indian foreign policy. Shastri’s response remains legendary: he appealed to the nation to skip one meal a day. Millions of middle-class households complied, choosing temporary hunger over the sacrifice of national dignity. Today, India faces a modern equivalent in the energy sector, yet the leadership’s response stands in stark contrast to that era of self-reliance.

False claim? What Venezuela is witnessing is not surrender but a tactical retreat

By Manolo De Los Santos  The early morning hours of January 3, 2026, marked an inflection point in Venezuela and Latin America’s centuries-long struggle for self-determination and independence. Operation Absolute Resolve, ordered by the Trump administration, constituted the most brutal and direct military assault on a sovereign state in the region in recent memory. In a shocking operation that left hundreds dead, President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores were illegally kidnapped from Venezuelan soil and transported to the United States, where they now face fabricated charges in a New York federal detention facility. In the two months since this act of war, a torrent of speculation has emerged from so-called experts and pundits across the political spectrum. This has followed three main lines: One . The operation’s success indicated treason at the highest levels of the Bolivarian Revolution. Two . Acting President Delcy Rodríguez and the remaining leadership have abandone...