Skip to main content

Have babus begun to sense political shift in India as farmers agitate across the country?

By Rajiv Shah 
As farmers’ agitation gripped the country on September 25, a retired IAS bureaucrat, whom I have known for nearly two decades, phoned me us to get a feel of what I felt would be its impact. I said, I don’t know, as it is too early to assess, but I wondered whether the fact that it shook the entire country would mean that tables have begun turning against Prime Minister Narendra Modi. 
This bureaucrat, who has been a keen watcher of the Indian political scene and has been in direct touch with those in the top positions of power, said, “Indeed, this is what many of the bureaucrats across India have begun to discuss... After all, we in the administration have always had access to know what the mood of the political masters is...”
This bureaucrat, who has mostly served in Gujarat, suggested that the agricultural bills, passed in Parliament, show that Modi was ill-advised, or “to be more precise, there is nobody left around whom to whom he would listen.” The bureaucrat agreed, there was time when Arun Jaitley, whom Modi would listen, was around. He was a sobering impact on Modi.
“What I see is, people have begun rising... In India, they rise slowly, but when they do, it would be a major flare-up, which may have begun taking shape now. Modi doesn’t seem to realise this”, he said. I asked whether anybody among the bureaucrats advise Modi that the type of agriculture bills he has got passed in Parliament actually would be politically harmful.
“Indian bureaucrats don’t work that way. They look up to their political masters, sense their pulse, and react accordingly”, he said, adding, “While majority of them are very capable administrators and know solutions, they wouldn’t like to push the government in the desired direction. They would leave the guidance part to the ruling politicians, and just follow them.”
“Not that they cannot deliver”, he claimed. “Most of them can. But there very few who wouldn’t care for what their political masters say, and go ahead and administer without caring for what would happen to themif they act in a way that may not be to the liking of ruling politicians. Such bureaucrats often resign, or find themselves out of the power structure.”
I wondered whether Modi’s right-hand Amit Shah would be of any help, considering his ill health. “There is no health bulletin about him any more. Nobody knows about his health. But if he unable to carry out what Modi tells him what to do, then things may begin to fall apart. The first test would be Bihar elections, where Amit Shah was the main campaigner. He is unable to campaign because of his ill health.”

Comments

TRENDING

Gujarat Sachivalaya blacklists, denies entry to woman social activist: Will NHRC probe?

By Kantilal Parmar*  I have approached the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) seeking an independent, impartial, and transparent investigation into a serious incident that took place at the Gujarat Secretariat in Gandhinagar on August 18, 2026. The matter concerns social activist and women’s rights leader Chandrikaben Solanki, who, according to the information available to me, was denied an entry pass to the Secretariat when she went there to meet Gujarat’s Social Justice and Empowerment Minister, Dr. Manishaben Vakil, to raise an issue concerning social justice.

Tibetan activist’s self-immolation sparks fresh concerns over cultural rights

By Kumar Krishnan*  The question of Tibet has once again entered international discourse, raising difficult questions about human rights, religious freedom, cultural identity, language, and the relationship between political power and the rights of indigenous communities. On 20 August 2026, the Kashag and the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile jointly organised a solidarity prayer service and peace march to mark the 49th day since the death of Lobga Rangzen, a Tibetan activist who died after self-immolating on 2 July in front of the United Nations Headquarters in New York.

IMF's policies 'stabilise' external creditors' balance sheets, 'generate' crisis in Africa

By Grieve Chelwa, Vijay Prashad   Across Africa, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) presents itself as the custodian of macroeconomic stability. Its latest Article IV staff reports on Ethiopia . Malawi , Nigeria , South Africa , and Zambia are written for economies with very different histories and institutions. Yet they converge on a familiar prescription: fiscal consolidation, tighter monetary policy, market-determined exchange rates, subsidy reform, deregulation and ‘private-sector-led growth’. No serious economist can dismiss macroeconomic stability.