Decision to merge nationalised banks violates national law: Civil society seminar told

Prof Jayati Ghosh, Dr Thomas Franco, Sitaram Yechury

By A Representative
Is the Government of India decision to merge 10 nationalised banks without any legal basis? Speaking at a recent seminar organised by the Financial Accountability Network India (FANI), Dr Thomas Franco, former general secretary, All-India Bank Officers’ Confederation, said, “Bank merger is against the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, which stipulates that the consent from board and shareholders is mandatory.”
Several participants in the seminar accused the step as a move to bail out the "struggling corporates", even as pointing out that the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) decision to transfer Rs 1.76 lakh crore to the government as per the recommendations of the Bimal Jalan-led committee would on only "mess up with public finances."
Attended by representatives of civil society organisations, unions, students, teachers and concerned citizens, Sitaram Yechury, general secretary, CPI(M), told the seminar, “The transfer of RBI’s surplus to the government would destabilise RBI, make India vulnerable in an on-going global and domestic recession.” He added, the banks merger was done "at the behest of corporates, who have been demanding this to deal with one bank than the consortium of banks for the loans.”
Jayati Ghosh, professor of economics at the Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), asserted, “RBI’s autonomy died in November 2016 when the government declared demonetisation. The present government is the one without any accountability. The economic mess India is in also stems from this.” He added, "RBI’s money will go towards plugging in the holes created by the demonetisation and hastily implemented GST.”
Others who spoke on the occasion included Prof CP Chandrasekhar, professor of economics, JNU; Paranjoy Guha Thakurta, journalist and author; VK Tomar, secretary-general, National Confederation of Officers’ Associations of Central PSUs; and Purushottam Sharma, leader, CPI (ML).

How strategic is India's commercial expansion in the Mediterranean?

By Vijay Prashad On 26 October 2026, Greece’s foreign minister George Gerapetritis stood at the United Nations headquarters and rejected the maritime agreement between Turkey and Libya. Gerapetritis spoke on behalf of Greece of course, but also Bahrain, Cyprus, Egypt, the European Union, and the United Arab Emirates. Five days later, the Indian frigate INS Trishul entered Souda Bay in Crete as part of activities with the US Navy installation (Naval Support Activity) and with the NATO Maritime Interdiction Operational Training Centre. The sequence illuminates a developing strategic geography: India’s naval reach, its confrontation with Pakistan’s new Turkish partner, and its ambition to connect Indian capital to European markets increasingly converge in the eastern Mediterranean.

Letter to Modi seeks cancellation of "coercive" anti-NGO order on foreign funding rules

By A Representative Around 70 civil rights organizations have come together to strategize “a collective response to the stifling of civil society space” in the wake of the recent Government of India clampdown on NGOs, telling Prime Minister Narendra Modi that government steps are “coercive” in nature, are “without reasonable cause or due process”, and seek to “cripple” the ability of NGOs to “carry on their legitimate and sanctioned work.”

The Modi-Adani relationship: Corporate power, political proximity and accountability

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan India's economic transformation over the past decade has been marked by ambitious infrastructure projects, increased global investment and the emergence of powerful corporate conglomerates. Alongside this growth, however, concerns about crony capitalism, the concentration of economic power and the influence of political connections on business opportunities have become increasingly prominent.

Counterview

Search This Blog