Skip to main content

19% rural UP women taking maternal care 'shouted upon, insulted, threatened': Survey

By Rajiv Shah 
A study funded, among others, by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, seeking to analyse what it calls person-centred maternity care or PCMC, has found that 57% of the 1,475 women surveyed taking maternity care in India reported that health service providers, including hospital managers, doctors and nurses, “never asked permission before performing medical procedures”, while 69% of women “reported that providers did not explain the purpose of examinations or procedures”.
Regretting that 58% of the women reported that they did not receive explanations on medications they were given, the study, published in the prestigious health journal “Lancet”, and carried out by Patience A Afulani, Beth Phillips, Raymond A Aborigo and Cheryl A Moyer, further found that in 18% of cases of doctors, nurses, or other health-care providers generally “shouted, scolded, insulted, threatened, or talked rudely” on women who had come for maternity care.
Carried out among women in Ghana, Kenya and India, the survey involved women in the age group 15–49 (average age 25) in 20 “predominantly rural” districts or Uttar Pradesh, with the University of California and the Community Empowerment Lab (India) working as collaborative partners. The “cross-sectional study” was carried out to find out the quality of maternity care in rural Uttar Pradesh.
The study revealed that in 23% of cases doctors, nurses, or other staff did not generally treat women for with respect, and in about 19% of cases they were shouted upon, scolded, insulted, or threatened. However, in 97% of cases, the women agreed, they were not “treated roughly” – by being pushed, beaten, slapped, pinched, physically restrained, or gagged.
The survey found that during examinations in the labour room, 32% of those surveyed complained they were “not covered up”; 38% said they felt that their “health information was or will be kept confidential”; and in 98% of cases the healthcare providers never introduced themselves when they first came to see the women.
Further, in 50% of cases the healthcare providers didn’t call the women by their name; and in 71% cases doctors, nurses or other staff at the facility did not involve women in the decisions about their care. Further, during delivery, in 87% of cases, the doctors, nurses, or other staff at the facility did not seek permission or consent before doing procedures on women. 
According to the survey, in 69% of cases the doctors and nurses never explained why they were doing examinations or procedures; in 78% of cases most of the time the health service providers did not explain what medicines were being given; in 35% of cases they generally did not feel like any questions which they had; in 78% of cases the doctors and nurses did not talk to them about how they were feeling; and in 55% of cases they did not try to understand the women’s anxieties.
Coming to infrastructure of the health facilities, the survey found that 39% of those surveyed felt that the labour and postnatal wards were crowded; 37% said the wards, washrooms, and the general environment of the health facility were dirty or very dirty; and 15% said most of the time there was no water facility.
Pointing out that in a scale in which 0 is the worst score and 90 is the best, the healthcare facilities in India had PCMC score of 40, the study, however, said, “In India, employed and wealthier women reported a higher PCMC score than did unemployed and poorer women, as did women who delivered in the health centres when compared with those who delivered in hospitals.”

Comments

TRENDING

Civil society at a crossroads: Service delivery vs. rights in the fight for social change

Counterview News   In the latest episode of the podcast Unmute , hosts Gagan Sethi and Minar Pimple convened a profound conversation with two veteran development practitioners to dissect a persistent tension within civil society: the perceived divide between service delivery and the struggle for rights. The episode, titled "Beyond Service Delivery: Civil Society, Rights, and the Politics of Social Change," featured Apoorva Oza , a development practitioner with decades of experience in rural development and institution-building, and Professor Dipa Sinha , a development economist known for her work on food, nutrition, gender, and social policy.

Grain vs. gasoline: How the global biofuel boom threatens India’s food and water security

By Rajiv Shah  A new report published by the international research and advocacy organization GRAIN has warned that the global resurgence of biofuels is triggering a dangerous dynamic of “more fuel, less food, more land grabs.” Driven by intersecting energy security concerns, geopolitical tensions, and aggressive decarbonization mandates, the expanding agrofuel industry is increasingly pitting corporate energy interests against global food security and indigenous land rights. 

Sikkim governor row: ALIFA asks centre to explain hurried appointment in Ankita Bhandari case

By A Representative   The All-India Feminist Alliance (ALIFA) on Saturday expressed “immense pain and outrage” that even after four years and a national uproar, justice has not been fully delivered in the Ankita Bhandari murder case and that a ruling party politician facing allegations has been “gifted a high-ranking constitutional office.” In a statement, ALIFA extended “unflinching solidarity” to Ankita’s parents, who it said are “fighting for justice on the streets of Delhi,” and demanded that pending the CBI inquiry and judicial decision, the appointment of BJP leader Dushyant Kumar Gautam as Sikkim’s Governor be subject to “immediate presidential review.”