Skip to main content

Naive to assume Modi wasn't aware of Banaras students' protest when he was in town, or ruthless lathi-charge after he left

Counterview Desk
About 50 prominent activists attached with the National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM) have condemned “state repression” on Banaras Hindu University (BHU) women students, who were demanding a sexual-violence free campus, demanding criminal action against BHU’s vice chancellor for his omissions and commissions in the entire episode. Text of the statement:
The National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM) condemns the Uttar Pradesh government’s violent, cowardly and indefensible crack down on the young women-students led movement in the Banaras Hindu University (BHU) campus, seeking a university space with equal rights for women and freedom from sexual harassment and violence. That the long standing and quite simple demands of the students were not being addressed and in fact survivors of sexual harassment were repeatedly being shamed by the male proctors, even as the identified perpetrators were being allowed to go Scot-free, compelled the students to embark on a peaceful mass protest, in the wake of relentless incidents of sexual harassment on the campus.

Instead of engaging in a dialogue with the agitating students and resolving their basic and genuine grievances, the university authorities led by the vice chancellor (VC), undoubtedly, at the behest of the State government chose to physically brutalize the students, late into the night and again on the next day, by unlawfully unleashing a rabid male police force on women students! We have also learnt from credible sources that the VC and proctors have allowed a group of ‘private security’ inside the campus, who were the first to unleash violence on the students, before the police struck!
While on the one hand, this government prides itself in slogans and schemes of ‘Beti Bachao’ Beti Padhao’; on the other it seeks to curtail the most fundamental freedoms of girls and women in multiple ways by moral policing, privatization, lack of basic amenities, safety and non-resolution of grievances. It is exactly this reality that the ‘brave betis’ of BHU tried to expose through their peaceful protest and demanded amongst other things, a campus where they could take for granted an atmosphere of safety and security from misogynistic oppression and violence and where there would be no arbitrary and discriminative restrictions on them owing to their gender. We salute the courageous struggle of the young women students and express our complete solidarity with them.
The incidents at BHU bring forth two very basic issues; one, the manner of appointments of the vice-chancellors and two, the lack of effective mechanisms for redressal of complaints, especially that of sexual harassment. As a practice, vice-chancellors must be competent, independent and persons of high integrity in academic and social life, committed to constitutional values. What we are instead witnessing is a clear trend of appointment of VCs, such as that of BHU, who are committed to a certain unconstitutional ideology and have charges of corruption and cases pending in the courts! The issue of appointments of VCs must needs to be seriously addressed.
We also completely endorse the demands of the young women students for effective mechanisms and systems in place (such as GSCASH) to seriously and empathetically address grievances / complaints, especially that of sexual harassment and gender-based discrimination and violence, in line with the Vishakha Guidelines of the Supreme Court and the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013. These mechanisms must be formed with the active involvement of the women students, women faculty and well-known, credible and committed women civil society activists.
The BHU episode, after Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) and Hyderabad Central University (HCU), is yet another stark reminder of the larger challenge of ‘saffronization’ of our Universities at the highest levels, where no less than the vice-chancellors, who are handpicked to serve the ideological and political agendas of the ruling dispensation impose some of the most arbitrary and draconian restrictions, especially on female and politically active students. Actions such as limiting library hours, early closure of college gates, curbs on late-evening usage of mobile phones by women students, embargo on serving of non-vegetarian food, coercing students to sign affidavits not to participate in political activity, all reek of the patriarchal and regressive mindset of the BHU VC, defeating the scientific and secular temper of our Constitution.
It would be naive to assume that the Prime Minister, in whose constituency the university is situated, was neither aware of the student’s protest when he was in town, nor of the ruthless lathi-charge which took place, soon after he left Banaras! His regular route was in fact changed, to avoid his interface with the protestors at BHU! We are appalled that the university authorities have not only failed in discharging their duties of ensuring a safe campus for the girl students and considering their complaints promptly and seriously; they have in fact been imposing illogical restrictions and playing a blame game of naming ‘outsiders’ and shaming insiders, instead of dealing sternly with those who violate the rights of girl students. They are also clearly responsible for letting the police inside the campus, facilitating the repression and registering en masse 1,000 FIRs on the students!
We strongly feel and demand that an FIR must be filed against Mr Girish Chandra Tripathi, the vice-chancellor of BHU, for all the omissions and commissions in this episode. Besides, Mr Tripathi, who is singularly responsible on behalf of the university to allow the situation to deteriorate must be removed with immediate effect, both on ethical and legal grounds!
We also think the Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh owes a public apology to the hundreds of girls for the inaction and damage that has been caused, because of his government. FIRs against all students must be dropped unconditionally and instead FIRs must be filed against senior police and administrative officials for directing a lathi-charge on the students. Injured students must be compensated for the physical and mental trauma.
The university must immediately initiate a process of dialogue with the students and act upon their demands, ensuring their education within the campus in a safe and dignified manner. In particular, the university must immediately deploy female security personnel in sufficient strength and constitute GSCASH committees with the active involvement of the women students, women faculty and well-known, credible and committed women civil society activists.
Teesta Setalvad

We also condemn the 10 hrs arbitrary and unlawful detention of well-known journalist and human rights activist Teesta Setalvad, who was in Banaras on Monday to attend a pre-committed youth training event and categorically stated to the police that she had no plan to visit BHU. It is indeed reprehensible that the government chooses to detain and / or arrest anyone, in an unconstitutional manner, without any sufficient ground and in this case Teesta, since she rightly and lawfully refused to sign a bond undertaking that she would not enter the BHU campus. Her late night release with a warning to leave Banaras immediately and not enter BHU is also unlawful and condemnable. We think the political and legal impunity of the present government to indulge in such arbitrary actions, one after the other, in a relentless and remorseless manner, will cost it dearly.
---
Signatories include:
Medha Patkar, Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA)
Aruna Roy, Nikhil Dey and Shankar Singh, Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS)
Prafulla Samantara, Lok Shakti Abhiyan
Binayak Sen and Kavita Srivastava, People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL)
Others

Comments

TRENDING

From algorithms to exploitation: New report exposes plight of India's gig workers

By Jag Jivan   The recent report, "State of Finance in India Report 2024-25," released by a coalition including the Centre for Financial Accountability, Focus on the Global South, and other organizations, paints a stark picture of India's burgeoning digital economy, particularly highlighting the exploitation faced by gig workers on platform-based services. 

'Condonation of war crimes against women and children’: IPSN on Trump’s Gaza Board

By A Representative   The India-Palestine Solidarity Network (IPSN) has strongly condemned the announcement of a proposed “Board of Peace” for Gaza and Palestine by former US President Donald J. Trump, calling it an initiative that “condones war crimes against children and women” and “rubs salt in Palestinian wounds.”

India’s road to sustainability: Why alternative fuels matter beyond electric vehicles

By Suyash Gupta*  India’s worsening air quality makes the shift towards clean mobility urgent. However, while electric vehicles (EVs) are central to India’s strategy, they alone cannot address the country’s diverse pollution and energy challenges.

Gig workers hold online strike on republic day; nationwide protests planned on February 3

By A Representative   Gig and platform service workers across the country observed a nationwide online strike on Republic Day, responding to a call given by the Gig & Platform Service Workers Union (GIPSWU) to protest what it described as exploitation, insecurity and denial of basic worker rights in the platform economy. The union said women gig workers led the January 26 action by switching off their work apps as a mark of protest.

Jayanthi Natarajan "never stood by tribals' rights" in MNC Vedanta's move to mine Niyamigiri Hills in Odisha

By A Representative The Odisha Chapter of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity (CSD), which played a vital role in the struggle for the enactment of historic Forest Rights Act, 2006 has blamed former Union environment minister Jaynaynthi Natarjan for failing to play any vital role to defend the tribals' rights in the forest areas during her tenure under the former UPA government. Countering her recent statement that she rejected environmental clearance to Vendanta, the top UK-based NMC, despite tremendous pressure from her colleagues in Cabinet and huge criticism from industry, and the claim that her decision was “upheld by the Supreme Court”, the CSD said this is simply not true, and actually she "disrespected" FRA.

Stands 'exposed': Cavalier attitude towards rushed construction of Char Dham project

By Bharat Dogra*  The nation heaved a big sigh of relief when the 41 workers trapped in the under-construction Silkyara-Barkot tunnel (Uttarkashi district of Uttarakhand) were finally rescued on November 28 after a 17-day rescue effort. All those involved in the rescue effort deserve a big thanks of the entire country. The government deserves appreciation for providing all-round support.

Whither space for the marginalised in Kerala's privately-driven townships after landslides?

By Ipshita Basu, Sudheesh R.C.  In the early hours of July 30 2024, a landslide in the Wayanad district of Kerala state, India, killed 400 people. The Punjirimattom, Mundakkai, Vellarimala and Chooralmala villages in the Western Ghats mountain range turned into a dystopian rubble of uprooted trees and debris.

Fragmented opposition and identity politics shaping Tamil Nadu’s 2026 election battle

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  Tamil Nadu is set to go to the polls in April 2026, and the political battle lines are beginning to take shape. Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to the state on January 23, 2026, marked the formal launch of the Bharatiya Janata Party’s campaign against the ruling Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK). Addressing multiple public meetings, the Prime Minister accused the DMK government of corruption, criminality, and dynastic politics, and called for Tamil Nadu to be “freed from DMK’s chains.” PM Modi alleged that the DMK had turned Tamil Nadu into a drug-ridden state and betrayed public trust by governing through what he described as “Corruption, Mafia and Crime,” derisively terming it “CMC rule.” He claimed that despite making numerous promises, the DMK had failed to deliver meaningful development. He also targeted what he described as the party’s dynastic character, arguing that the government functioned primarily for the benefit of a single family a...

Over 40% of gig workers earn below ₹15,000 a month: Economic Survey

By A Representative   The Finance Minister, Nirmala Sitharaman, while reviewing the Economic Survey in Parliament on Tuesday, highlighted the rapid growth of gig and platform workers in India. According to the Survey, the number of gig workers has increased from 7.7 million to around 12 million, marking a growth of about 55 percent. Their share in the overall workforce is projected to rise from 2 percent to 6.7 percent, with gig workers expected to contribute approximately ₹2.35 lakh crore to the GDP by 2030. The Survey also noted that over 40 percent of gig workers earn less than ₹15,000 per month.