Skip to main content

Zero "funds flow" for Gujarat's poor urban minorities vs allocation of whopping Rs 2,033 crore for housing

Ahmedabad protest for better infrastructure in minority areas
By A Representative
Has the Gujarat government been summarily indifferent towards providing housing to poor urban minorities, whether during chief ministership of Narendra Modi, which lasted till May 2014, or thereafter? It would seem so, if the official figures, released by the Government of India, are any indication.
Though a big proportion of minorities live in urban areas, it did not “flow” any funds to help the poor sections living in cities/towns which have “a substantial minority population”, despite an allocation of a whopping Rs 2,033.08 crore in 2014-15.  While the figures for later years are not available, the all-India figures are not impressive either -- Rs 22,346.39 allocated, of which Rs 5,226.47 were spent.
In the rural Gujarat, however, things were better: Under housing to minorities under the Pradhan Mantri Awaas Yojana (Gramin), during the year 2015-16, the target was 2,589 beneficiaries, while the achievement was 2,382.
Gujarat has eight minority concentrated blocks Kutch, Rajkot district and Bharuch districts. Its 10 minority-concentrated towns are in Kutch, Junagadh, Panchmahals, Bharuch, Sabarkantha, Ahmedabad, Rajkot, Junagardh, Anand in Borsad districts.
Released by the Ministry of Minority Affairs, and compiled by Mujahid Nafees, convener, Minority Coordination Committee, Gujarat, facts show that the Government of India may have set the target of providing assistance to 670 minority beneficiaries for setting up of individual and group micro-enterprises in 2014-15, but the state government did nothing to move it forward.
At the all-India level, the target was to approach 9,000 beneficiaries, out of which 5,668 were “helped.”
Similarly, 4,424 minority beneficiaries in self-help groups were to be helped, but not one beneficiary benefited. The comparative all-India figures are: Help to 67,614 beneficiaries against t the target of 60,000.
Mujahid Nafees
Similarly, during 2014-15, the Gujarat government did not extend any special help to upgrade the skill of minority beneficiaries, though the target was to training 5,535. Here, the all-India target was 75,000 and the minorities who benefited from it were 29,880. Figures for subsequent years are not available.
The figures further reveal that the Gujarat government did not construct any primary or upper schools in 2006-07 under the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan in districts with substantial minority population under the Prime Minister’s 15 point programme to alleviate the plight of the minorities.
Also, under the National Rural Drinking Water Programme, there was no “flow of benefits/funds to districts having a substantial minority population”. Even the all-India performance on this score for coverage of habitations was a poor 22.41 per cent.
Under the previous UPA rule, the Government of India floated the Multi-Sectoral Development Programme (MSDP) as a centrally sponsored scheme. It decided to implement MSDP in 710 minority concentration Blocks, 66 minority concentration town and 13 clusters of contagious villages.
Continued by the NDA rule, says an official source, “this programme aims at improving the socio-economic infrastructure and basic amenities for uplifting the quality of life of the minorities”, even as providing “financial support for creation of assets for education (viz. school building, polytechnics, ITIs, hostels etc), health centres, drinking water and road projects, as also some income generation projects.
Projects are approved on the basis of the project proposals received from the states/UTs as per their requirement and felt need (click HERE for guidelines).
During the three years ending 2016-17, the Gujarat government did not do anything to float projects under MSDP, hence not one penny flowed in. The all-India figures were not impressive either – during 2016-17, for instance the projects approved were worth Rs 1076.22 crore, while Rs 859.56 crore “flowed in.”

Comments

TRENDING

From algorithms to exploitation: New report exposes plight of India's gig workers

By Jag Jivan   The recent report, "State of Finance in India Report 2024-25," released by a coalition including the Centre for Financial Accountability, Focus on the Global South, and other organizations, paints a stark picture of India's burgeoning digital economy, particularly highlighting the exploitation faced by gig workers on platform-based services. 

'Condonation of war crimes against women and children’: IPSN on Trump’s Gaza Board

By A Representative   The India-Palestine Solidarity Network (IPSN) has strongly condemned the announcement of a proposed “Board of Peace” for Gaza and Palestine by former US President Donald J. Trump, calling it an initiative that “condones war crimes against children and women” and “rubs salt in Palestinian wounds.”

India’s road to sustainability: Why alternative fuels matter beyond electric vehicles

By Suyash Gupta*  India’s worsening air quality makes the shift towards clean mobility urgent. However, while electric vehicles (EVs) are central to India’s strategy, they alone cannot address the country’s diverse pollution and energy challenges.

Gig workers hold online strike on republic day; nationwide protests planned on February 3

By A Representative   Gig and platform service workers across the country observed a nationwide online strike on Republic Day, responding to a call given by the Gig & Platform Service Workers Union (GIPSWU) to protest what it described as exploitation, insecurity and denial of basic worker rights in the platform economy. The union said women gig workers led the January 26 action by switching off their work apps as a mark of protest.

Jayanthi Natarajan "never stood by tribals' rights" in MNC Vedanta's move to mine Niyamigiri Hills in Odisha

By A Representative The Odisha Chapter of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity (CSD), which played a vital role in the struggle for the enactment of historic Forest Rights Act, 2006 has blamed former Union environment minister Jaynaynthi Natarjan for failing to play any vital role to defend the tribals' rights in the forest areas during her tenure under the former UPA government. Countering her recent statement that she rejected environmental clearance to Vendanta, the top UK-based NMC, despite tremendous pressure from her colleagues in Cabinet and huge criticism from industry, and the claim that her decision was “upheld by the Supreme Court”, the CSD said this is simply not true, and actually she "disrespected" FRA.

Stands 'exposed': Cavalier attitude towards rushed construction of Char Dham project

By Bharat Dogra*  The nation heaved a big sigh of relief when the 41 workers trapped in the under-construction Silkyara-Barkot tunnel (Uttarkashi district of Uttarakhand) were finally rescued on November 28 after a 17-day rescue effort. All those involved in the rescue effort deserve a big thanks of the entire country. The government deserves appreciation for providing all-round support.

Whither space for the marginalised in Kerala's privately-driven townships after landslides?

By Ipshita Basu, Sudheesh R.C.  In the early hours of July 30 2024, a landslide in the Wayanad district of Kerala state, India, killed 400 people. The Punjirimattom, Mundakkai, Vellarimala and Chooralmala villages in the Western Ghats mountain range turned into a dystopian rubble of uprooted trees and debris.

Over 40% of gig workers earn below ₹15,000 a month: Economic Survey

By A Representative   The Finance Minister, Nirmala Sitharaman, while reviewing the Economic Survey in Parliament on Tuesday, highlighted the rapid growth of gig and platform workers in India. According to the Survey, the number of gig workers has increased from 7.7 million to around 12 million, marking a growth of about 55 percent. Their share in the overall workforce is projected to rise from 2 percent to 6.7 percent, with gig workers expected to contribute approximately ₹2.35 lakh crore to the GDP by 2030. The Survey also noted that over 40 percent of gig workers earn less than ₹15,000 per month.

Fragmented opposition and identity politics shaping Tamil Nadu’s 2026 election battle

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  Tamil Nadu is set to go to the polls in April 2026, and the political battle lines are beginning to take shape. Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to the state on January 23, 2026, marked the formal launch of the Bharatiya Janata Party’s campaign against the ruling Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK). Addressing multiple public meetings, the Prime Minister accused the DMK government of corruption, criminality, and dynastic politics, and called for Tamil Nadu to be “freed from DMK’s chains.” PM Modi alleged that the DMK had turned Tamil Nadu into a drug-ridden state and betrayed public trust by governing through what he described as “Corruption, Mafia and Crime,” derisively terming it “CMC rule.” He claimed that despite making numerous promises, the DMK had failed to deliver meaningful development. He also targeted what he described as the party’s dynastic character, arguing that the government functioned primarily for the benefit of a single family a...