Skip to main content

Gujarat govt imposes prohibitory orders in Ahmedabad rural to "preempt" farmers' padyatra against Dholera smart city

Replica of Dholera smart city
Gujarat government is learnt to have imposed prohibitory orders across the entire Ahmedabad district, except for Ahmedabad city. The decision to impose Section 144 in the district’s rural areas comes close on the heels of the “permission” sought by an upcoming farmers’ organization, Khedut Samaj – Gujarat (KSG), to hold padyatra against the proposed Smart City in Dholera Special Investment Region (SIR), 90 km south of Ahmedabad, along the Gulf of Khambhat.
The permission sought for padyatra – or footmarch – was for starting the agitation from village Bavaliyari on October 28, and ending it on November 3 at the district collector’s office in Ahmedabad city. It was to pass through all the 22 villages, which are part of the Dholera SIR, spread over 900 sq km. The written plea seeking permission for the padyatra said, only 100 farmers would participate.
According to sources, the order to impose Section 144 says, the additional district magistrate has “imposed a ban on gathering of more than four persons or holding any rally or meeting on all roads, footpaths, streets and bylanes in the entire district, with the exception of the area falling under the jurisdiction of the Ahmedabad municipal commissioner.”
While the KSG sought the permission for the padyatra programme on October 14, the sources added, the decision to impose prohibitory orders was taken, with the consent of the very top in Gujarat government, two days later – on October 16.
The decision for taking out the padyatra was taken following flutter among the farmers of Dholera SIR after Gujarat government declared it would hand over “hand over” 28,503 hectares (ha) of land of the region to the special purpose vehicle (SPV) formed for developing Smart City in Dholera SIR – Dholera Special Investment Region Development Authority (DSIRDA).
Farmers fear they would lose half of their land, that too at a very cheap rate, about Rs 600 per sq metre. While the Government of India has dropped the amendments to the Land Acquisition Act (LAA), 2013, sources say, the Gujarat government wants to “bypass” LAA by imposing the town planning Act, which requires farmers to hand over 50 per cent of land for a designated urban area in the name of urbanization.
Sagar Rabari of KSG, one of the senior farmer leaders, told Counterview, he personally went to the district collector’s office in Ahmedabad to get a copy of the prohibitory order, but was “refused”. He added, “The Gujarat Samachar newspaper’s Bhavnagar edition has reported government move, yet, the officials do not want to give it to us.”
Meanwhile, the Ahmedabad (rural) police has summoned another KSG leader, Bharatsinh Jhala, to Dholera SIR region for recording his statement about his “intention” to take out the padyatra. “Jhala, in whose name the permission was sought, has gone to Dholera for what now will remain a formality, as the padyatra has been banned”, said Rabari.
Alleging that while permission is easily given to “dominant caste” agitators, such as Patels, Rabari said, “When vulnerable communities (Dalits, Adivasis, Other Backward Castes) decide to protest for their genuine demands, such as refusal to be party to any forcible land acquisition, they are just refused permission.”
“This is not for the first time that permission for an agitation has not been granted in Ahmedabad”, Sabari said, adding, “On January 11, the farmers wanted to agitate against the Vibrant Gujarat business summit about 10 kilometres away, yet we were not granted permission. In fact, all agitation leaders, including myself, were detained. There is a constant prohibitory order in entire Ahmedabad district. I am filing a right to information (RTI) to give me copies of all the notification filed for Ahmedabad (rural) imposing ban on agitations since January 1, 2013.”

Comments

TRENDING

Dalit rights and political tensions: Why is Mevani at odds with Congress leadership?

While I have known Jignesh Mevani, one of the dozen-odd Congress MLAs from Gujarat, ever since my Gandhinagar days—when he was a young activist aligned with well-known human rights lawyer Mukul Sinha’s organisation, Jan Sangharsh Manch—he became famous following the July 2016 Una Dalit atrocity, in which seven members of a family were brutally assaulted by self-proclaimed cow vigilantes while skinning a dead cow, a traditional occupation among Dalits.  

Powering pollution, heating homes: Why are Delhi residents opposing incineration-based waste management

While going through the 50-odd-page report Burning Waste, Warming Cities? Waste-to-Energy (WTE) Incineration and Urban Heat in Delhi , authored by Chythenyen Devika Kulasekaran of the well-known advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability, I came across a reference to Sukhdev Vihar — a place where I lived for almost a decade before moving to Moscow in 1986 as the foreign correspondent of the daily Patriot and weekly Link .

Boeing 787 under scrutiny again after Ahmedabad crash: Whistleblower warnings resurface

A heart-wrenching tragedy has taken place in Ahmedabad. As widely reported, a Boeing 787 Dreamliner plane crashed shortly after taking off from the city’s airport, currently operated by India’s top tycoon, Gautam Adani. The aircraft was carrying 230 passengers and 12 crew members.  As expected, the crash has led to an outpouring of grief across the country. At the same time, there have been demands for the resignation of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Home Minister Amit Shah, and the Civil Aviation Minister.

Ahmedabad's civic chaos: Drainage woes, waterlogging, and the illusion of Olympic dreams

In response to my blog on overflowing gutter lines at several spots in Ahmedabad's Vejalpur, a heavily populated area, a close acquaintance informed me that it's not just the middle-class housing societies that are affected by the nuisance. Preeti Das, who lives in a posh locality in what is fashionably called the SoBo area, tells me, "Things are worse in our society, Applewood."

Global NGO slams India for media clampdown during conflict, downplays Pakistan

A global civil rights group, Civicus has taken strong exception to how critical commentaries during the “recent conflict” with Pakistan were censored in India, with journalists getting “targeted”. I have no quarrel with the Civicus view, as the facts mentioned in it are all true.

Whither SCOPE? Twelve years on, Gujarat’s official English remains frozen in time

While writing my previous blog on how and why Narendra Modi went out of his way to promote English when he was Gujarat chief minister — despite opposition from people in the Sangh Parivar — I came across an interesting write-up by Aakar Patel, a well-known name among journalists and civil society circles.

Remembering Vijay Rupani: A quiet BJP leader who listened beyond party lines

Late evening on June 12, a senior sociologist of Indian origin, who lives in Vienna, asked me a pointed question: Of the 241 persons who died as a result of the devastating plane crash in Ahmedabad the other day, did I know anyone? I had no hesitation in telling her: former Gujarat chief minister Vijay Rupani, whom I described to her as "one of the more sensible persons in the BJP leadership."

A conman, a demolition man: How 'prominent' scribes are defending Pritish Nandy

How to defend Pritish Nandy? That’s the big question some of his so-called fans seem to ponder, especially amidst sharp criticism of his alleged insensitivity during his journalistic career. One such incident involved the theft and publication of the birth certificate of Masaba Gupta, daughter of actor Neena Gupta, in the Illustrated Weekly of India, which Nandy was editing at the time. He reportedly did this to uncover the identity of Masaba’s father.

Why India’s renewable energy sector struggles under 2,735 compliance hurdles

Recently, during a conversation with an industry representative, I was told how easy it is to set up a startup in Singapore compared to India. This gentleman, who had recently visited Singapore, explained that one of the key reasons Indians living in the Southeast Asian nation prefer establishing startups there is because the government is “extremely supportive” when it comes to obtaining clearances. “They don’t want to shift operations to India due to the large number of bureaucratic hurdles,” he remarked.