Skip to main content

Civil society groups unite to oppose Rajasthan anti-conversion Bill, urge Governor to withhold assent

By A Representative 
A coalition of civil society organisations, rights groups and faith-based associations has strongly condemned the passage of the “Rajasthan Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion Bill, 2025” in the State Assembly on September 9, calling it draconian, unconstitutional and a direct attack on the fundamental rights of minorities. The statement was released at a press conference held at Vinoba Gyan Mandir, Jaipur, where representatives of more than a dozen organisations declared that they would actively lobby against the bill and urged the Governor not to grant assent, but instead refer it to the President of India under Article 200 of the Constitution.
The organisations argued that the Rajasthan bill is harsher and more invasive than existing anti-conversion laws in eleven states and violates Articles 14, 19, 21 and 25 of the Constitution. They noted that similar attempts in Rajasthan in 2006 and 2008 were blocked when the Governors of the time withheld assent and forwarded the bills to the President. The joint statement alleged that the law, far from protecting public order, will be used as a political tool by the ruling BJP to spread fear and hostility against minorities and to impose the ideological agenda of the Sangh Parivar.
Citing provisions that criminalise even ordinary discussions of faith as “allurement” and impose severe penalties ranging from seven years to life imprisonment with fines up to ₹30 lakh, the groups warned that the bill violates constitutional guarantees of freedom of conscience and the right to privacy. They pointed to Section 5, which introduces the concept of “love jihad” into the statute, as particularly dangerous, and criticised the exemption for so-called “reconversion to ancestral religion” as an attempt to privilege Hinduism while treating all other faiths as subordinate.
The statement also linked the passage of the bill with a spike in targeted violence. Since September 3, when the bill was reintroduced in the Assembly, at least ten incidents of attacks, harassment or arrests involving Christians have been reported across districts including Alwar, Hanumangarh, Dungarpur, Kotputli-Behror and Jaipur. The signatories alleged that police have largely sided with right-wing groups such as the Bajrang Dal and VHP, often refusing to file FIRs against them while arresting pastors and intimidating worshippers. Particularly troubling, they said, were repeated incidents in Pratap Nagar, Jaipur, within the Chief Minister’s own constituency.
The coalition announced a multi-pronged strategy to oppose the legislation, including meetings with the Governor, public rallies, inter-community dialogues, state-wide campaigns, signature and postcard drives, and legal challenges before the Supreme Court. They emphasised that the law would not withstand judicial scrutiny, citing both constitutional infirmities and legislative incompetence, as matters relating to religion and propagation fall within Union jurisdiction.
The statement concluded that the bill undermines India’s secular framework by criminalising the peaceful exercise of religious freedom and enabling majoritarian domination. The undersigned organisations included the Jaipur Christian Fellowship, Rajasthan Samagra Seva Sangh, PUCL, APCR Rajasthan, Rajasthan Buddhist Mahasangh, NFIW, AIDWA, Daman Pratirodh Andolan, Youth Buddhist Society of India, Jamaat-e-Islami Rajasthan, Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind, SDPI Rajasthan, Rajasthan Nagrik Manch, Dalit–Muslim Ekta Manch, Welfare Party of India (Rajasthan) and the Ambedkarite Party of India.

Comments

  1. Conversion of religion is not necessary; One can change one's opinions, views & beliefs and yet not convert one's religion. Conversion has many challenges, some for life & can be very dangerous. A scientific approach of Exploring Truth and Opting it is a Civil Right irrespective of religion

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

NOTE: While there is no bar on viewpoint, comments containing hateful or abusive language will not be published and will be marked spam. -- Editor

TRENDING

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”

Manufacturing, services: India's low-skill, middle-skill labour remains underemployed

By Francis Kuriakose* The Indian economy was in a state of deceleration well before Covid-19 made its impact in early 2020. This can be inferred from the declining trends of four important macroeconomic variables that indicate the health of the economy in the last quarter of 2019.

Modi’s Israel visit strengthened Pakistan’s hand in US–Iran truce: Ex-Indian diplomat

By Jag Jivan   M. K. Bhadrakumar , a career diplomat with three decades of service in postings across the former Soviet Union, Pakistan, Iran, Afghanistan, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Germany, and Turkey, has warned that the current truce in the US–Iran war is “fragile and ridden with contradictions.” Writing in his blog India Punchline , Bhadrakumar argues that while Pakistan has emerged as a surprising broker of dialogue, the durability of the ceasefire remains uncertain.