Skip to main content

Islam is bigger than labels: Why's there need to embrace the Qur’an's inclusive spirit

By Mike Mohamed Ghouse*  
Farrukh Shaikh, a citizen who lives in  Dallas, has said, “This is a warning to all Muslims in this forum that Mike Ghouse’s religion is not Islam; he is Ismaili and a misguided person. If anyone needs more information about his religion, please let me know.”
Really? Aren’t Ismailis Muslims? So are Sunnis, Shi’as, Bohras, Ahmadis, Sufis, the WD Mohammed group, and many others. It is disheartening to see some Muslims diminish the universality of Islam. Islam is as vast as the sky, encompassing all of God’s creation. It is He who placed us in different tribes, communities, races, ethnicities, and nations, and I would even include other religions (49:13). Learning to respect and accept that uniqueness is equivalent to honoring the Creator’s choice. This is the message in the very first verse of the first surah, Al-Fatiha, in the very first verse of the last surah, An-Nas, and throughout the Qur’an, where God addresses mankind.
The great scholar Mohammed Asad highlights this idea in his Tafsir, particularly referencing verse 2:62. He states that anyone who believes in God, acknowledges accountability on the Day of Judgment, and cares for God’s creation is considered a Muslim—a submitter to God’s will. I have cited this in my article, “Who is a Muslim, and what is Islam?”
It is important to recognize that Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) introduced a progressive way of life—Islam. He abolished cruel practices such as infanticide, proclaimed for the first time in civilizational history that women could own their own businesses and property, propose marriage, and even initiate divorce. He took the steps to abolish slavery and introduced many other progressive values, changing the culture significantly over the course of 23 years. If it is not common sense, then it is not Islam. This was a monumental change, and we should not forget it. Instead, we should continue to promote and advance this spirit of progressiveness.
I wish Farrukh Shaikh had written to me directly instead of circulating misinformation. He could have simply said, “Mike Ghouse is a Muslim, but I’m unsure which denomination he belongs to since I have not verified it. It appears that he belongs to all groups, including Shia, Sunni, Sufi, Bohra, Ahmadiyya, Ismaili, Alawite, and others.” That would have been fair.
Prophet Muhammad knew only one group of people: Muslims. Terms like Sunni, Shia, Ahmadiyya, Bohra, Sufi, Ismaili, WD Muhammad, Alawite, Deobandi, Barelvi, Ahl-e-Hadith, and Ahl-e-Bait did not exist in his time. Different groups or denominations are natural outcomes of societal development. The Prophet understood human nature and even predicted that the singular faith he taught would eventually divide into many strands. He used the metaphorical number seventy-two to symbolize the infinite number of splits that could occur.
His message, however, was one of coexistence and humility. He taught us to live with our differences, to race in doing good, but to avoid arrogance and self-righteousness, which God dislikes. Even a sinner may be forgiven by God for a simple act of kindness—such as giving water to a thirsty dog—especially when extended to fellow humans. Only God knows the full impact of our actions on His creation. Our responsibility is to strive to be good human beings who care for others and for the environment.
Wouldn’t you feel happy if your guests took meticulous care of your property before leaving? Or if your employees ensured your business was intact and well-maintained? Do you really worry whether that employee is Jewish, Hindu, Muslim, Christian, or Sikh as long as they fulfill their responsibility with honesty? Likewise, God does not concern Himself with labels; He appreciates our contributions to preserving His creation and restoring harmony through justice, fairness, and kindness.
My Hindu friends will recognize parallels in their own tradition: Brahma the creator, Vishnu the sustainer, and Shiva the recycler. God in Islam is no different—He sustains, restores, and nurtures His creation. The universal question He asks of us is simple: are you good to your fellow beings and to the environment?
The Qur’an is the word of God, but its meanings have been interpreted differently across times and traditions. No one, not even the greatest Imams, can claim their interpretation as the only one. Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) did not appoint anyone as the sole interpreter of the Qur’an; he simply said, “I am leaving this book with you for your understanding, and you cannot go wrong if you follow it.” The Shia tradition views this differently, and we must respect their interpretation.
If God is kind and merciful, and if the Prophet is described as a mercy to humanity, then the teachings we find in the Qur’an are aimed at universal goodness and inclusivity. Islam is too expansive a religion to exclude anyone. Every faith has followed the natural path of divisions. Christianity branched into Catholicism, Protestantism, and hundreds of denominations. Hinduism, Buddhism, Judaism, and Sikhism have also splintered into many schools. Islam too began with one vision, one community, but it evolved into many traditions. The Prophet was aware of this inevitability.
As for me, I have chosen to remain denomination-less. If you hear me pray, it will sound like the Sunni tradition only because I was raised in that environment. If I had been born into a Shia or Ahmadi family, I would have prayed in that manner. It doesn’t make one superior or inferior. Each tradition is precious to the believer. As the saying goes, “Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder; faith is in the heart of the believer.” The Qur’an itself says: “To you is your faith, and to me is my faith.” (109:6).
I am comfortable with every tradition of Muslim prayer. I have visited mosques of almost all denominations, including the three most revered ones in Mecca, Madinah, and Jerusalem. The next place I intend to visit is Karbala, where Imam Hussain stood for justice at the cost of his entire family. Am I following the inclusive, progressive path of the Prophet? Yes, I am. Then why should I limit myself to a label? I am a Muslim, period. I have no walls between me and another Muslim, and no barriers between me and another human being.
The World Muslim Congress was formed with the express purpose of creating space for every Muslim, and the Center for Pluralism was created for all humanity. Over the years, we have conducted 780 hours of radio talk shows and 40 workshops covering traditions from Atheism to Zoroastrianism, and every faith in between. The purpose was to understand each other and reduce tensions. It took years of effort, but that remains my commitment: to create a world where all humanity can get along by knowing each other.
The role of Muslims is not to divide, but to contribute to the well-being of humanity, to nurture goodwill, and to become conflict mitigators. Our goal is to build a secure world where every human can live in peace and dignity. The World Muslim Congress focuses on Muslims’ civic responsibility, not in dividing them by denomination, but in affirming their common faith in God, the Prophet, and accountability. Whoever calls themselves a Muslim is a Muslim to us. And today, we are blessed to have Christians, Hindus, Jews, Baha’is, Sikhs, and Buddhists among us to share their perspectives.
God loves us all. After all, we are His creation, and because He cares about us, He sends guidance to every community—a messenger, a prophet, an avatar, or a peacemaker—to show them how to live in harmony. The Bhagavad Gita phrases it differently but similarly: every time there is chaos in society, someone will emerge to restore righteousness. The Qur’an also affirms that God sent prophets to every nation. The name doesn’t matter; the message is the same: to preserve harmony, peace, and justice.
Islam has always emphasized serving fellow beings. God assures us—not just Muslims—that if we take care of His creation, He will take care of us. That, to me, is the essence of being a Muslim.
---
*Progressive wedding officiant, encourages inter-faith marriage; heads Center for Pluralism, a Washington DC-based non-profit organisation. This is the abridged version of the original blog which appeared in the World Muslim Congress site

Comments

TRENDING

The golden crop: How turmeric is transforming women's lives in tribal India

By Vikas Meshram*   When the lush green fields of turmeric sway in the tribal belt of southern Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, and Gujarat, it is not merely a spice crop — it is the golden glow of self-reliance. In villages where even basic spices once had to be bought from the market, the very soil today is yielding a prosperity that has transformed the lives of thousands of families. At the heart of this transformation is the initiative of Vaagdhara, which has linked turmeric with livelihoods, nutrition, and village self-governance — gram swaraj.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Authoritarian destruction of the public sphere in Ecuador: Trumpism in action?

By Pilar Troya Fernández  The situation in Ecuador under Daniel Noboa's government is one of authoritarianism advancing on several fronts simultaneously to consolidate neoliberalism and total submission to the US international agenda. These are not isolated measures, but rather a coordinated strategy that combines job insecurity, the dismantling of the welfare state, unrestricted access to mining, the continuation of oil exploitation without environmental considerations, the centralization of power through the financial suffocation of local governments, and the systematic criminalization of all forms of opposition and popular organization.

Echoes of Vietnam and Chile: The devastating cost of the I-A Axis in Iran

​ By Ram Puniyani  ​The recent joint military actions by Israel and the United States against Iran have been devastating. Like all wars, this conflict is brutal to its core, leaving a trail of human suffering in its wake. The stated pretext for this aggression—the brutality of the Ayatollah Khamenei regime and its nuclear ambitions—clashes sharply with the reality of the diplomatic landscape. Iran had expressed a willingness to remain at the negotiating table, signaling a readiness to concede points emerging from dialogue. 

False claim? What Venezuela is witnessing is not surrender but a tactical retreat

By Manolo De Los Santos  The early morning hours of January 3, 2026, marked an inflection point in Venezuela and Latin America’s centuries-long struggle for self-determination and independence. Operation Absolute Resolve, ordered by the Trump administration, constituted the most brutal and direct military assault on a sovereign state in the region in recent memory. In a shocking operation that left hundreds dead, President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores were illegally kidnapped from Venezuelan soil and transported to the United States, where they now face fabricated charges in a New York federal detention facility. In the two months since this act of war, a torrent of speculation has emerged from so-called experts and pundits across the political spectrum. This has followed three main lines: One . The operation’s success indicated treason at the highest levels of the Bolivarian Revolution. Two . Acting President Delcy Rodríguez and the remaining leadership have abandone...

The selective memory of a violent city: Uttam Nagar and the invisible victims of Delhi

By Sunil Kumar*  Hundreds of murders take place in Delhi every year, yet only a few incidents become topics of nationwide discussion. The question is: why does this happen? Today, the incident in Uttam Nagar has become the centre of national debate. A 26-year-old man, Tarun Kumar, was killed following a dispute that reportedly began after a balloon hit a small child. In several colonies of Delhi, slogans such as “Jai Shri Ram” and “Vande Mataram” are being raised while demanding the death penalty for Tarun’s killers. As a result, nearly 50,000 residents of Hastsal JJ Colony are now living in what resembles a state of confinement. 

The price of silence: Why Modi won’t follow Shastri, appeal for sacrifice

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey*  ​In 1965, as India grappled with war and a crippling food crisis, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri faced a United States that used wheat shipments under the PL-480 agreement as a lever to dictate Indian foreign policy. Shastri’s response remains legendary: he appealed to the nation to skip one meal a day. Millions of middle-class households complied, choosing temporary hunger over the sacrifice of national dignity. Today, India faces a modern equivalent in the energy sector, yet the leadership’s response stands in stark contrast to that era of self-reliance.

Love letters in a lifelong war: Babusha Kohli’s resistance in verse

By Ravi Ranjan*  “War does not determine who is right—only who is left.” Bertrand Russell’s words echo hauntingly in our times, and few contemporary Hindi poets embody this truth as profoundly as Babusha Kohli. Emerging from Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Kohli has carved a unique space in literature by weaving together tenderness, protest, and philosophy across poetry, prose, and cinema. Her work is not merely artistic expression—it is resistance, refuge, and a call for peace.