Skip to main content

Thirteen BHU students fabricated on false charges win bail rights

By Harsh Thakor* 
Thirteen students arrested on charges of attempting to burn the Manusmriti at Banaras Hindu University (BHU) were granted bail on January 11, 2025. The following day, on January 12, the students held a press conference under the banner of the Bhagat Singh Students Morcha (BSM) at Paradkar Bhawan in Maidagin.
The arrested individuals—Mukesh Kumar, Sandeep Jaiswal, Amar Sharma, Arvind Pal, Anupam Kumar, Lakshman Kumar, Avinash, Arvind, Shubham Kumar, Adarsh, Ipsita Agarwal, Siddhi Tiwari, and Katyayani B. Reddy—were accused of planning to burn the Manusmriti as part of a protest.
During the press conference, Advocate Prem Prakash Singh Yadav criticized the arrests, describing them as unconstitutional. According to Amar Ujala, Advocate Yadav alleged that the charges violated Supreme Court guidelines and fundamental human rights. He further highlighted discrepancies in the police records, noting that while three female students were detained on the evening of December 25, the First Information Report (FIR) misleadingly listed their arrest date as December 26. Yadav assured that legal action would be taken against the officers involved.
Akanksha Azad, president of the Bhagat Singh Students Morcha, condemned the BHU administration, asserting that the arrests were part of a vendetta against their long-standing struggle for democratic rights. She referred to a 2023 incident in which the university administration allegedly shielded the accused in a gang rape case involving an IIT-BHU student until the Morcha’s pressure led to their arrests. Azad argued that the recent arrests in the Manusmriti case were another example of institutional retaliation against dissent.
Civil society representative S.P. Rai also criticized BHU, highlighting the contradiction in supporting research on the Manusmriti while penalizing discussions around it. Rai expressed solidarity with the students and reaffirmed civil society’s support for their rights.
The Bhagat Singh Students Morcha announced plans for another press conference to expose the fabricated charges. Advocate Prem Prakash Yadav reiterated that the allegations were baseless and aimed at criminalizing the students.
The arrests stemmed from an event at BHU on December 25, 2024, organized by the BSM to observe Manusmriti Dahan Divas, commemorating Dr. B.R. Ambedkar’s symbolic burning of the Manusmriti in 1927 to protest caste discrimination. The discussion, held at the Arts Faculty, was disrupted by university officials and security personnel, leading to clashes.
An FIR (No. 523/2024) filed on December 26 accused 13 BSM members of violent and disruptive behavior, including pushing and assaulting security staff. Nine current students and four alumni were charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, including assault on public servants, inciting religious hostility, rioting, and attempted culpable homicide.
The FIR alleged that the students gathered near the Arts Faculty at 5:30 PM with the intent to burn the Manusmriti. Security personnel claimed the students misbehaved, assaulted guards, and injured two female staff members, Shipra Mishra and Shikha Mishra, who were hospitalized.
The arrested students were taken to Lanka Police Station, held overnight without access to legal counsel, and reportedly subjected to physical assault. They were sent to 14-day judicial custody at the District Jail, Chaukaghat.
Students alleged they were physically assaulted, their clothes torn, and personal belongings damaged during detention. As they were taken to jail, the students protested, chanting slogans like “Manusmriti Murdabad,” “Inquilab Zindabad,” “Jai Bhim,” and “Stop violence against students.”
The charges against the 13 individuals carry a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison.
---
*Freelance journalist

Comments

TRENDING

From algorithms to exploitation: New report exposes plight of India's gig workers

By Jag Jivan   The recent report, "State of Finance in India Report 2024-25," released by a coalition including the Centre for Financial Accountability, Focus on the Global South, and other organizations, paints a stark picture of India's burgeoning digital economy, particularly highlighting the exploitation faced by gig workers on platform-based services. 

'Condonation of war crimes against women and children’: IPSN on Trump’s Gaza Board

By A Representative   The India-Palestine Solidarity Network (IPSN) has strongly condemned the announcement of a proposed “Board of Peace” for Gaza and Palestine by former US President Donald J. Trump, calling it an initiative that “condones war crimes against children and women” and “rubs salt in Palestinian wounds.”

Gig workers hold online strike on republic day; nationwide protests planned on February 3

By A Representative   Gig and platform service workers across the country observed a nationwide online strike on Republic Day, responding to a call given by the Gig & Platform Service Workers Union (GIPSWU) to protest what it described as exploitation, insecurity and denial of basic worker rights in the platform economy. The union said women gig workers led the January 26 action by switching off their work apps as a mark of protest.

India’s road to sustainability: Why alternative fuels matter beyond electric vehicles

By Suyash Gupta*  India’s worsening air quality makes the shift towards clean mobility urgent. However, while electric vehicles (EVs) are central to India’s strategy, they alone cannot address the country’s diverse pollution and energy challenges.

Jayanthi Natarajan "never stood by tribals' rights" in MNC Vedanta's move to mine Niyamigiri Hills in Odisha

By A Representative The Odisha Chapter of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity (CSD), which played a vital role in the struggle for the enactment of historic Forest Rights Act, 2006 has blamed former Union environment minister Jaynaynthi Natarjan for failing to play any vital role to defend the tribals' rights in the forest areas during her tenure under the former UPA government. Countering her recent statement that she rejected environmental clearance to Vendanta, the top UK-based NMC, despite tremendous pressure from her colleagues in Cabinet and huge criticism from industry, and the claim that her decision was “upheld by the Supreme Court”, the CSD said this is simply not true, and actually she "disrespected" FRA.

Stands 'exposed': Cavalier attitude towards rushed construction of Char Dham project

By Bharat Dogra*  The nation heaved a big sigh of relief when the 41 workers trapped in the under-construction Silkyara-Barkot tunnel (Uttarkashi district of Uttarakhand) were finally rescued on November 28 after a 17-day rescue effort. All those involved in the rescue effort deserve a big thanks of the entire country. The government deserves appreciation for providing all-round support.

Whither space for the marginalised in Kerala's privately-driven townships after landslides?

By Ipshita Basu, Sudheesh R.C.  In the early hours of July 30 2024, a landslide in the Wayanad district of Kerala state, India, killed 400 people. The Punjirimattom, Mundakkai, Vellarimala and Chooralmala villages in the Western Ghats mountain range turned into a dystopian rubble of uprooted trees and debris.

Over 40% of gig workers earn below ₹15,000 a month: Economic Survey

By A Representative   The Finance Minister, Nirmala Sitharaman, while reviewing the Economic Survey in Parliament on Tuesday, highlighted the rapid growth of gig and platform workers in India. According to the Survey, the number of gig workers has increased from 7.7 million to around 12 million, marking a growth of about 55 percent. Their share in the overall workforce is projected to rise from 2 percent to 6.7 percent, with gig workers expected to contribute approximately ₹2.35 lakh crore to the GDP by 2030. The Survey also noted that over 40 percent of gig workers earn less than ₹15,000 per month.

Fragmented opposition and identity politics shaping Tamil Nadu’s 2026 election battle

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  Tamil Nadu is set to go to the polls in April 2026, and the political battle lines are beginning to take shape. Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to the state on January 23, 2026, marked the formal launch of the Bharatiya Janata Party’s campaign against the ruling Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK). Addressing multiple public meetings, the Prime Minister accused the DMK government of corruption, criminality, and dynastic politics, and called for Tamil Nadu to be “freed from DMK’s chains.” PM Modi alleged that the DMK had turned Tamil Nadu into a drug-ridden state and betrayed public trust by governing through what he described as “Corruption, Mafia and Crime,” derisively terming it “CMC rule.” He claimed that despite making numerous promises, the DMK had failed to deliver meaningful development. He also targeted what he described as the party’s dynastic character, arguing that the government functioned primarily for the benefit of a single family a...