Skip to main content

Like many extremist leaders, Sinwar 'did not seek' a peaceful Palestinian state alongside Israel

By Bhaskar Sur* 
The death of Yahya Sinwar, mastermind behind the October 7 massacre last year, came on October 16, after a life marked by violence and radicalism. Born in 1962 in a refugee camp, Sinwar harbored intense hatred towards Jews, which ultimately defined his actions and worldview. He masterminded the killing of 1,200 Israelis, and, like Hitler, envisioned a "Final Solution"—the destruction of Israel and a second Holocaust.
Sinwar’s early involvement with the Muslim Brotherhood, a militant Islamist organization, set the stage for his later leadership in Hamas, a group driven by the goal of erasing Israel. He was imprisoned in Israel for killing 12 Palestinians suspected of spying, and during his time in prison, he became fluent in Hebrew and a prolific reader, gaining cleverness but not wisdom. Upon his release in 2011 as part of a prisoner exchange, he quickly resumed militant activities, working with Hamas to develop military strategies.
Like many extremist leaders, Sinwar did not seek a peaceful Palestinian state alongside Israel. Instead, he envisioned the total conquest of "Mandate Palestine," from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea, necessitating the eradication of Israel and its people. This ambition is not just impractical but disastrous, with Palestinians themselves likely to suffer the greatest consequences.
Western commentators, unfamiliar with Islamic traditions and the real goals of groups like Hamas, often misunderstand the situation. They focus on the desire for a Palestinian state, overlooking the fact that Arab states initially rejected the 1947 UN partition plan, which provided for such a state. For many Arabs, the existence of Israel is seen as an affront to Islam, making coexistence with the Jewish state unacceptable.
Over the years, as secular Arab leaders failed to destroy Israel, Islamist movements like Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran's Islamic Revolution filled the vacuum. Hamas, despite being a Sunni group, accepted aid from Shia Iran, joining the so-called Axis of Resistance—a coalition committed to Israel’s destruction.
The October 7 massacre was a calculated move to provoke Israel into a retaliatory strike, hoping that global outrage over civilian casualties would shift sentiment against Israel. For Hamas, high casualties among Palestinians serve a dual purpose: rallying support from the global liberal left while simultaneously framing those who die in jihad as martyrs destined for paradise.
Sinwar, like other extremist leaders, was driven by an ideology that prioritized the destruction of Israel above all else, indifferent to the suffering of his own people. He shares with figures like Pol Pot the brutal certainty of his convictions, showing no concern for the human cost of his dangerous ambitions. Those who support or sympathize with such figures, whether out of ideological blindness or self-deception, are similarly complicit in the tragic consequences.
---
Source: Author's Facebook timeline 

Comments

Anonymous said…
Sinwar was a hero. The jewish lies no longer work.

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

  By Rajiv Shah   This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.

Love letters in a lifelong war: Babusha Kohli’s resistance in verse

By Ravi Ranjan*  “War does not determine who is right—only who is left.” Bertrand Russell’s words echo hauntingly in our times, and few contemporary Hindi poets embody this truth as profoundly as Babusha Kohli. Emerging from Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Kohli has carved a unique space in literature by weaving together tenderness, protest, and philosophy across poetry, prose, and cinema. Her work is not merely artistic expression—it is resistance, refuge, and a call for peace.

The golden crop: How turmeric is transforming women's lives in tribal India

By Vikas Meshram*   When the lush green fields of turmeric sway in the tribal belt of southern Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, and Gujarat, it is not merely a spice crop — it is the golden glow of self-reliance. In villages where even basic spices once had to be bought from the market, the very soil today is yielding a prosperity that has transformed the lives of thousands of families. At the heart of this transformation is the initiative of Vaagdhara, which has linked turmeric with livelihoods, nutrition, and village self-governance — gram swaraj.

Authoritarian destruction of the public sphere in Ecuador: Trumpism in action?

By Pilar Troya Fernández  The situation in Ecuador under Daniel Noboa's government is one of authoritarianism advancing on several fronts simultaneously to consolidate neoliberalism and total submission to the US international agenda. These are not isolated measures, but rather a coordinated strategy that combines job insecurity, the dismantling of the welfare state, unrestricted access to mining, the continuation of oil exploitation without environmental considerations, the centralization of power through the financial suffocation of local governments, and the systematic criminalization of all forms of opposition and popular organization.

Echoes of Vietnam and Chile: The devastating cost of the I-A Axis in Iran

​ By Ram Puniyani  ​The recent joint military actions by Israel and the United States against Iran have been devastating. Like all wars, this conflict is brutal to its core, leaving a trail of human suffering in its wake. The stated pretext for this aggression—the brutality of the Ayatollah Khamenei regime and its nuclear ambitions—clashes sharply with the reality of the diplomatic landscape. Iran had expressed a willingness to remain at the negotiating table, signaling a readiness to concede points emerging from dialogue. 

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

False claim? What Venezuela is witnessing is not surrender but a tactical retreat

By Manolo De Los Santos  The early morning hours of January 3, 2026, marked an inflection point in Venezuela and Latin America’s centuries-long struggle for self-determination and independence. Operation Absolute Resolve, ordered by the Trump administration, constituted the most brutal and direct military assault on a sovereign state in the region in recent memory. In a shocking operation that left hundreds dead, President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores were illegally kidnapped from Venezuelan soil and transported to the United States, where they now face fabricated charges in a New York federal detention facility. In the two months since this act of war, a torrent of speculation has emerged from so-called experts and pundits across the political spectrum. This has followed three main lines: One . The operation’s success indicated treason at the highest levels of the Bolivarian Revolution. Two . Acting President Delcy RodrĂ­guez and the remaining leadership have abandone...

The price of silence: Why Modi won’t follow Shastri, appeal for sacrifice

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey*  ​In 1965, as India grappled with war and a crippling food crisis, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri faced a United States that used wheat shipments under the PL-480 agreement as a lever to dictate Indian foreign policy. Shastri’s response remains legendary: he appealed to the nation to skip one meal a day. Millions of middle-class households complied, choosing temporary hunger over the sacrifice of national dignity. Today, India faces a modern equivalent in the energy sector, yet the leadership’s response stands in stark contrast to that era of self-reliance.