Skip to main content

Isolationist? Modi's multi-alignment foreign policy 'designed by colonial, imperialist powers'

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*
After independence, India became the architect of the  Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), which refused to join the warmongering, imperialist, and colonial power blocs in both their regressive and progressive forms. The idealism of the NAM revolves around principles of egalitarian coexistence, solidarity, peace, and harmony. 
Under India's leadership, NAM successfully united nearly 120 countries to oppose all forms of imperialism and colonialism during and after the Cold War. Newly independent Asian, African, Latin American and Middle Eastern countries adopted NAM's principles as part of their foreign policy to maintain independence from European colonialism and American imperialism. These policies were central to pursue independent economic and development policies focusing on people, peace and collective prosperity. 
India played a major role in transforming NAM into a united international movement against colonialism and imperialism, promoting an independent path of peace and development opposed to capitalism. NAM served as a platform for solidarity against all forms of colonial and imperialist wars, conflicts, and the polarisation of people and the planet. 
However, this principled movement has been undermined by directionless Hindutva street politics, which, in the name of upholding national interests, pursues a doctrine of multi-alignment or multi-vector foreign policy. Such an isolationist policy, pursued in the name of national interest, serves neither the interests of India nor those of the world.
Narendra Modi, the poster boy of Hindutva politics and the Prime Minister of India for a third term, continues to spend considerable time on foreign trips, engaging in public displays of affection by hugging foreign leaders and staging well-choreographed meetings with the Indian diaspora. A coordinated crony-capitalist media campaign portrays Modi as a global leader during his foreign trips. 
However, under the guise of protecting national interests, Modi and his government align with reactionary, Zionist, warmongering, and imperialist powers. In this way,  Modi has not only undermined India's national interests and the idealism of its foreign policy but has also tarnished India's NAM image as an anti-colonial and anti-imperialist leader among Asian, African, and Latin American nations.
The Hindutva supremacist politics and the carefully curated machismo leadership of  Modi have damaged India's relationships with its immediate neighbours and friends abroad. These neighbouring countries either distrust or fear India's dominant policy positions. 
Modi and his supercilious Hindutva politics are fundamentally responsible for creating this situation in the neighbourhood. The Hindutva leadership, with its myopic vision, has failed to consolidate the global goodwill India once enjoyed due to its historic anti-colonial, anti-imperialist, and anti-war positions in world politics. 
There is an abundance of goodwill still exists for India and its people wherever one visits. However, Hindutva politics and its leadership have failed to identify and consolidate this goodwill by aligning with Zionist, colonial, and imperialist regimes in the name of national interests. 
There is no greater national interest than the goodwill of the people. Hindutva politics undermines this goodwill through its supremacist politics of hate. The ignominious Hindutva leadership and their myopic politics has ruined NAM, its relevance and significance in shaping world politics in the path of peace and solidarity.  
Colonial and imperialist powers in America and Europe have long sought to undermine  NAM and its collective strength to weaken countries in Asia, Africa, Latin America, and the Arab world. India was their best bait. Ultimately, Hindutva leadership has allowed Americans and Europeans to dismantle NAM, with India adopting a multi-alignment foreign policy. 
Hindutva leadership and its myopic politics has ruined NAM, its relevance in shaping world politics
This so-called doctrine of multi-vector foreign policy is an isolationist approach designed by colonial and imperialist powers to divide nations under the guise of national interest, thereby controlling their states and governments and hindering their ability to take independent positions in global politics.
The interests of India and its people can be consolidated through the revival of NAM as a collective foreign policy strategy aimed at deepening democracy, peace, solidarity, and shared prosperity. 
In contrast, multi-alignment and multi-vector foreign policies serve neither the interests of India and its citizens nor those of global peace. Friendships and long-term collaborations are not formed by following self-interests. It is formed on the basis of common idealism and long-term interests. 
The Hindutva led Indian foreign policy significantly affects Indian working masses in their everyday lives, especially when oil prices rise due to imperialist wars in Europe and the Middle East. Therefore, India needs a mass movement against the directionless Hindutva foreign policy to reclaim its anti-colonial, anti-imperialist, and anti-war foundations, as shaped by the  NAM. 
Reviving NAM is crucial for countering the rising imperialism led by America and Europe. India and its citizens must play their historic role in reclaiming “peace and solidarity” as the core of their foreign policy and restoring NAM as an international peace movement.
Modi follows an individual-centric foreign policy shaped by his crony capitalist friends and his leadership comfort zone, influenced by the reactionary ideology of Hindutva politics. This Hindutva ideology and its European origin is concomitant with its Eurocentric values in politics which undermines the principles of NAM for deepening relationships with Yankee imperialism and racialised colonial Europe. 
These forces can never be trustworthy allies of India and its people. American and European leadership primarily represent the interests of their corporations and global capitalism, showing little concern for their own countries and citizens. Why would these countries and their ruling elites ever uphold the interests of India and its people?
---
*Scholar based in UK

Comments

Post a Comment

TRENDING

Grueling summer ahead: Cuttack’s alarming health trends and what they mean for Odisha

By Sudhansu R Das  The preparation to face the summer should begin early in Odisha. People in the state endure long, grueling summer months starting from mid-February and extending until the end of October. This prolonged heat adversely affects productivity, causes deaths and diseases, and impacts agriculture, tourism and the unorganized sector. The social, economic and cultural life of the state remains severely disrupted during the peak heat months.
Post a Comment
»

Stronger India–Russia partnership highlights a missed energy breakthrough

By N.S. Venkataraman*  The recent visit of Russian President Vladimir Putin to India was widely publicized across several countries and has attracted significant global attention. The warmth with which Mr. Putin was received by Prime Minister Narendra Modi was particularly noted, prompting policy planners worldwide to examine the implications of this cordial relationship for the global economy and political climate. India–Russia relations have stood on a strong foundation for decades and have consistently withstood geopolitical shifts. This is in marked contrast to India’s ties with the United States, which have experienced fluctuations under different U.S. administrations.
Post a Comment
»

From natural farming to fair prices: Young entrepreneurs show a new path

By Bharat Dogra   There have been frequent debates on agro-business companies not showing adequate concern for the livelihoods of small farmers. Farmers’ unions have often protested—generally with good reason—that while they do not receive fair returns despite high risks and hard work, corporate interests that merely process the crops produced by farmers earn disproportionately high profits. Hence, there is a growing demand for alternative models of agro-business development that demonstrate genuine commitment to protecting farmer livelihoods.
Post a Comment
»

The Vande Mataram debate and the politics of manufactured controversy

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The recent Vande Mataram debate in Parliament was never meant to foster genuine dialogue. Each political party spoke past the other, addressing its own constituency, ensuring that clips went viral rather than contributing to meaningful deliberation. The objective was clear: to construct a Hindutva narrative ahead of the Bengal elections. Predictably, the Lok Sabha will likely expunge the opposition’s “controversial” remarks while retaining blatant inaccuracies voiced by ministers and ruling-party members. The BJP has mastered the art of inserting distortions into parliamentary records to provide them with a veneer of historical legitimacy.
Post a Comment
»

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.
Post a Comment
»

The cost of being Indian: How inequality and market logic redefine rights

By Vikas Gupta   We, the people of India, are engaged in a daily tryst—read: struggle—for basic human rights. For the seemingly well-to-do, the wish list includes constant water supply, clean air, safe roads, punctual public transportation, and crime-free neighbourhoods. For those further down the ladder, the struggle is starker: food that fills the stomach, water that doesn’t sicken, medicines that don’t kill, houses that don’t flood, habitats at safe distances from polluted streams or garbage piles, and exploitation-free environments in the public institutions they are compelled to navigate.
Post a Comment
»

Why India must urgently strengthen its policies for an ageing population

By Bharat Dogra   A quiet but far-reaching demographic transformation is reshaping much of the world. As life expectancy rises and birth rates fall, societies are witnessing a rapid increase in the proportion of older people. This shift has profound implications for public policy, and the need to strengthen frameworks for healthy and secure ageing has never been more urgent. India is among the countries where these pressures will intensify most sharply in the coming decades.
Post a Comment
»

Thota Sitaramaiah: An internal pillar of an underground organisation

By Harsh Thakor*  Thota Sitaramaiah was regarded within his circles as an example of the many individuals whose work in various underground movements remained largely unknown to the wider public. While some leaders become visible through organisational roles or media attention, many others contribute quietly, without public recognition. Sitaramaiah was considered one such figure. He passed away on December 8, 2025, at the age of 65.
Post a Comment
»

Proposals for Babri Masjid, Ram Temple spark fears of polarisation before West Bengal polls

By A Representative   A political debate has emerged in West Bengal following recent announcements about plans for new religious structures in Murshidabad district, including a proposed mosque to be named Babri Masjid and a separate announcement by a BJP leader regarding the construction of a Ram temple in another location within Behrampur.
Post a Comment
»