Skip to main content

Equal representation? Elite dominance 'undermining' essence of democracy

Bhabani Shankar Nayak* 

The reality of Western democracy is structured in such a way that it effectively excludes many people from meaningful participation in decision-making processes. While citizens do vote and participate in elections, this engagement often serves as a veneer of inclusivity and equal opportunity that masks the underlying dominance of elites within the political system.
Despite the semblance of democratic participation, the political structure is heavily influenced and controlled by a small group of elites who have the power to shape policies and allocate resources in ways that primarily serve their own interests.
This elite dominance undermines the core democratic principle of equal representation and results in a political landscape where the voices of ordinary citizens are marginalised by the so-called democratic governments and states in Europe and America.
The concentration of power among elites leads to a political process that is less responsive to the needs and desires of the broader population. Instead, it tends to prioritise the agendas of those with significant economic and social influence.
This dynamic perpetuates inequality and fosters a sense of disenfranchisement among the general populace, who may feel that their votes and voices do not translate into actual influence over the governance of their countries.
The principles of democratic governance -- transparency, accountability, the rule of law, and inclusiveness -- are increasingly eroding within Western political systems. Despite the theoretical framework supporting broader political participation and fairer representation, the fundamental nature of capitalist states in Europe and America remains unchanged.
This persistent decline highlights a critical issue: the mechanisms designed to ensure a vibrant democracy are failing to counterbalance the entrenched power structures within these societies.
Even as citizens engage in elections and other forms of political participation, their ability to influence substantive policy decisions is severely limited. This discrepancy underscores a troubling trend where democratic ideals are subverted by economic interests of few capitalists.
In Western democracies, the alignment of government policies with the interests of capitalist corporations rather than those of the general populace is evident. This alignment manifests in legislation and regulatory frameworks that often prioritise corporate profitability and market stability over social welfare and equitable resource distribution.
The interests of ordinary citizens are sidelined, and their needs and aspirations are inadequately represented. The foundational principles of democracy are destroyed as a result of which citizens are no longer the shareholders of western democracy.
The so-called Western democratic countries, which often engage in imperialist wars, promote conflicts, and impose sanctions under the pretext of exporting democracy to countries in Asia, Africa, and Latin America, are experiencing a significant decline in their own democratic values and practices.
This situation highlights a profound irony and exposes the inherent contradictions within their political systems. The tragedy of these undemocratic foundations lies in their persistent assault on the very democratic values they claim to uphold.
While advocating for democracy abroad, these nations frequently undermine democratic principles at home. This duality not only erodes the credibility of Western democracies but also reveals the farcical nature of their commitment to genuine democratic ideals.
As these countries continue to prioritize geopolitical interests over the promotion of authentic democracy, the gap between their rhetoric and reality widens. This ongoing hypocrisy challenges the legitimacy of their democratic institutions and calls into question their role as global champions of democracy.
Consequently, it is imperative to critically examine and address these contradictions to foster a more genuine and consistent approach to democratic governance both domestically and internationally.
The so-called Western governments seemingly have the financial resources to engage in wars, military interventions and conflicts in various countries across Asia, Africa, Latin America, and Eastern Europe.
However, these same governments often fall short when it comes to investing in the critical infrastructures of health, education, and employment within their own nations. This disparity reveals a troubling prioritisation of resources.
Significant amounts of money are allocated to defence budgets and military operations, ostensibly to promote interests of global corporations in the name of global stability or protect national interests.
Yet, when it comes to addressing pressing domestic issues, such as expanding healthcare services, improving educational systems, and creating meaningful employment opportunities, these governments often claim budgetary constraints.
The consequences of this democratic deficit and misallocation of resources are profound. Underfunded health systems struggle to provide adequate care, leading to disparities in health outcomes and accessibility.
Educational institutions face resource shortages, impacting the quality of education and future prospects for students. Meanwhile, the lack of investment in creating sustainable and meaningful employment opportunities contributes to economic inequality and social instability.
The growth of hunger, homelessness, food insecurity, unemployment, and poverty represent a democratic disgrace for the so-called developed capitalist countries, where democracy is sacrificed to uphold the interests of corporate capitalism.
In these nations, the gap between the wealthy elite and the average citizen continues to widen, highlighting the failure of democratic systems to address the fundamental needs of their populations.
Despite the immense wealth and resources available in these countries, a significant portion of the population struggles with basic necessities. This stark contrast reveals the extent to which democratic ideals have been compromised in favour of maintaining and expanding corporate power and profits.
The prevalence of hunger and food insecurity is particularly alarming in affluent societies. Many individuals and families face difficulty accessing nutritious food, leading to widespread health problems and diminished quality of life.
Similarly, homelessness and inadequate housing conditions reflect the inability of the system to provide for its citizens, despite the presence of vast economic resources.
In Western democracies, alignment of government policies with the interests of capitalists  rather than those of the general populace is evident
Unemployment and underemployment further exacerbate these issues of individual dignity, as individuals are unable to secure stable, well-paying jobs that allow them to support themselves and their families. The resulting poverty traps many in a cycle of deprivation, with limited opportunities for upward mobility.
These social and economic issues in western countries are symptoms of a broader political problem: the prioritisation of corporate capitalism over the well-being of the populace.
Policies and practices that favour large corporations and the wealthy elite often come at the expense of the broader citizenry, undermining the principles of fairness, equity, and representation that are supposed to underpin democratic governance.
Such a situation not only calls for a re-evaluation of national priorities but also highlights the urgent need for mass struggle to deepen radical democracy and reclaim citizenship rights in western Europe and America.
This mass mobilisation can serve as a powerful force to challenge and change the existing power dynamics. By advocating for more equitable distribution of resources and greater public participation in decision-making processes, citizens can work towards a political system that truly represents their interests.
The push for radical democracy involves creating mechanisms for more direct citizen involvement, ensuring that policies and practices reflect the will of the majority rather than the interests of a privileged few. It requires transparency, accountability, and a commitment to social justice. Only through sustained collective action can citizens reclaim their rights and create a more just and equitable society.
These challenges also require a fundamental re-evaluation of the relationship between democracy and capitalism. It is essential to implement policies that ensure economic justice, such as fair wages, affordable housing, accessible healthcare, and robust social safety nets. It is vital to curb corporate influence in politics and promote greater transparency and accountability within the government.
The restoring of the integrity of democracy in these developed capitalist countries involves reclaiming it from the clutches of corporate interests and redirecting its focus towards serving the needs and rights of all citizens. By doing so, it is possible to build a society that is more just, equitable, and reflective of true democratic values.
---
*London Metropolitan University

Comments

TRENDING

Gujarat Information Commission issues warning against misinterpretation of RTI orders

By A Representative   The Gujarat Information Commission (GIC) has issued a press note clarifying that its orders limiting the number of Right to Information (RTI) applications for certain individuals apply only to those specific applicants. The GIC has warned that it will take disciplinary action against any public officials who misinterpret these orders to deny information to other citizens. The press note, signed by GIC Secretary Jaideep Dwivedi, states that the Right to Information Act, 2005, is a powerful tool for promoting transparency and accountability in public administration. However, the commission has observed that some applicants are misusing the act by filing an excessive number of applications, which disproportionately consumes the time and resources of Public Information Officers (PIOs), First Appellate Authorities (FAAs), and the commission itself. This misuse can cause delays for genuine applicants seeking justice. In response to this issue, and in acc...

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

'MGNREGA crisis deepening': NSM demands fair wages and end to digital exclusions

By A Representative   The NREGA Sangharsh Morcha (NSM), a coalition of independent unions of MGNREGA workers, has warned that the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) is facing a “severe crisis” due to persistent neglect and restrictive measures imposed by the Union Government.

Gandhiji quoted as saying his anti-untouchability view has little space for inter-dining with "lower" castes

By A Representative A senior activist close to Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA) leader Medha Patkar has defended top Booker prize winning novelist Arundhati Roy’s controversial utterance on Gandhiji that “his doctrine of nonviolence was based on an acceptance of the most brutal social hierarchy the world has ever known, the caste system.” Surprised at the police seeking video footage and transcript of Roy’s Mahatma Ayyankali memorial lecture at the Kerala University on July 17, Nandini K Oza in a recent blog quotes from available sources to “prove” that Gandhiji indeed believed in “removal of untouchability within the caste system.”

Targeted eviction of Bengali-speaking Muslims across Assam districts alleged

By A Representative   A delegation led by prominent academic and civil rights leader Sandeep Pandey  visited three districts in Assam—Goalpara, Dhubri, and Lakhimpur—between 2 and 4 September 2025 to meet families affected by recent demolitions and evictions. The delegation reported widespread displacement of Bengali-speaking Muslim communities, many of whom possess valid citizenship documents including Aadhaar, voter ID, ration cards, PAN cards, and NRC certification. 

'Centre criminally negligent': SKM demands national disaster declaration in flood-hit states

By A Representative   The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has urged the Centre to immediately declare the recent floods and landslides in Punjab, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir, Uttarakhand, and Haryana as a national disaster, warning that the delay in doing so has deepened the suffering of the affected population.

Saffron Kingdom – a cinematic counter-narrative to The Kashmir Files

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  “Saffron Kingdom” is a film produced in the United States by members of the Kashmiri diaspora, positioned as a response to the 2022 release “The Kashmir Files.” While the latter focused on the exodus of Kashmiri Pandits and framed Kashmiri Muslims as perpetrators of violence, “Saffron Kingdom” seeks to present an alternate perspective—highlighting the experiences of Kashmiri Muslims facing alleged abuses by Indian security forces.

'Govts must walk the talk on gender equality, right to health, human rights to deliver SDGs by 2030'

By A Representative  With just 64 months left to deliver on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), global health and rights advocates have called upon governments to honour their commitments on gender equality and the human right to health. Speaking ahead of the 80th United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), experts warned that rising anti-rights and anti-gender pushes are threatening hard-won progress on SDG-3 (health and wellbeing) and SDG-5 (gender equality).

From lazy to lost? The myths and realities behind generational panic about youth

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak   Older generations in many societies often describe the young with labels such as “lazy, unproductive, lost, anxious, depoliticised, unpatriotic or wayward.” Others see them as “social media, mobile phone and porn addicts.” Such judgments arise from a generational anxiety rooted in fears of losing control and from distorted perceptions about youth, especially in the context of economic crises, conflicts, and wars in which many young lives are lost.