Skip to main content

Elite 'promote, practice' hereditary politics to undermine democratic struggle

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak* 

Democracy is not only a product of the struggles of the working classes, but its survival against all odds also depends on the unwavering commitment of the working people. Historically, the working class has played a pivotal role in the establishment, promotion and preservation of democratic processes and institutions. 
Their collective actions, from organising labour movements to participating in political processes, have been fundamental in shaping democratic societies, states, and governments. The ongoing resilience and active participation of the working class are crucial for maintaining and enhancing democratic cultures and values.
In times of political turmoil and economic challenges, it is often the working people who stand at the forefront, advocating for rights, justice, and equality. Their dedication ensures that democracy remains a dynamic and inclusive system, capable of addressing the needs and aspirations of all its citizens irrespective of their backgrounds. 
Therefore, acknowledging and supporting the contributions of the working class is essential for the continued health and growth of democratic governance.
However, the propertied classes, industrialists, and business owners, ruling and non-ruling elites continue to employ various strategies to undermine the working-class origins of democracy by promoting and practicing hereditary politics, as if political power is a property that must be inherited and controlled by a family. 
This approach not only contradicts the fundamental principles of democracy but also reinforces a system of entrenched privilege and inequality. By perpetuating the notion that political authority should remain within certain families, these elites aim to consolidate their power and maintain the status quo. 
This practice often results in a concentration of power that excludes the broader population, particularly women, working class, poor, marginalised communities, castes, people of colour from meaningful participation in the political processes.
Hereditary politics undermines the democratic ideal of equal opportunity and representation, fostering an environment where political positions are passed down through generations without regard to experience in public life, merit, or public service. The rich and powerful do not consider elections as tools for deepening democracy in the society. 
They often use elections as a means to capture state power, control government, and pursue their own interests. By leveraging their substantial resources, they influence electoral outcomes through extensive campaign financing, media control, and lobbying efforts. 
This enables them to shape policies and legislation in ways that favour their economic and political agendas. This manipulation of the democratic process undermines the principle of fair representation, as it skews the political landscape in favour of those with wealth and influence. 
Ordinary citizens find their voices drowned out by the sheer volume of money and power wielded by elite groups. As a result, policies that should serve the broader public interest are frequently designed to benefit a privileged few.
Such a strategy erodes public trust in democratic institutions and processes. When political power is perceived as a family heirloom rather than a public mandate, citizens become disillusioned with the democratic system and its ability to address their needs and concerns. 
This disillusionment leads to apathy, reduced civic engagement, and even social and political unrests. The influence of the rich and powerful extends beyond elections. 
They often maintain their grip on power by funding think tanks, political action committees, and other organisations that promote their interests. This creates a cycle where the same elite groups continue to dominate the political arena, perpetuating inequality and limiting social, political, and economic mobility.
Hereditary politics and inheritance of state power is fundamentally opposed to the democratic transformation of society, which seeks to ensure individual liberty, social and economic equality, and political justice. 
This system of inherited political power undermines the core democratic principles of participation, representation, and equal opportunity by concentrating authority within specific families or groups. Moreover, hereditary politics hampers political justice by limiting the diversity of perspectives and ideas within the government. 
When political power is confined to a few reactionary families, groups, the range of voices and viewpoints that influence policy making is significantly reduced. This exclusion of diverse opinions weakens the democratic process and can lead to governance that is out of touch with the realities and aspirations of the citizenry.
Electoral and constitutional democracies are not properties to be inherited based on family lineages. These forms of government are founded on the principles of egalitarian participation and representation, equal opportunity, and the collective will of the people. They are designed to ensure that political power is derived from the consent of the governed, not from inherited privilege. 
Hereditary politics fosters environment where political positions are passed down through generations without regard to merit
Hereditary politics erodes the integrity of democratic institutions by creating an uneven playing field where a select few enjoy disproportionate advantages. 
This practice often leads to governance that prioritises the interests of a narrow elite over the broader population. It stifles innovation and progress by limiting political leadership to a small, privileged group, regardless of their experiences, skills, or public support.
Moreover, the perception that political power can be inherited diminishes public trust in democratic processes. Citizens become disillusioned with a system that appears rigged in favour of entrenched elites, leading to apathy and disengagement. This weakens the very foundation of democracy, which relies on active and informed participation from all segments of society.
In a true democracy, political positions should be accessible to all citizens based on their abilities, ideas, and dedication to public service, rather than on their family lineage. Democratic political leaders are chosen through free and fair elections, reflecting the choices of the electorate. 
This process is meant to provide every eligible citizen with an equal opportunity to participate in the political arena, either as voters or as candidates. When political power is concentrated within specific families and passed down through generations, it undermines these democratic ideals.
Hereditary politics contradicts the foundations of democratic ideals, fostering an environment where power is passed down through generations, often irrespective of competence or public approval. Such a system perpetuates social and economic inequalities by entrenching a ruling class that is insulated from the experiences and struggles of ordinary people. 
This leads to policies and decisions that favour the interests of the elite, rather than addressing the needs of the broader population. As a result, the gap between the wealthy and the poor widens, and social, economic, and political mobility is stifled that derails democratic empowerment of people.
It is necessary to dismantle the structures that support hereditary politics to foster a truly democratic society that upholds individual liberty, social and economic equality, and political justice. It is also essential to encourage and facilitate wider political participation, implementing strict anti-nepotism laws, and promoting transparency and accountability in government are crucial steps to ensure democratic outcomes. 
By ensuring that political power is earned and not inherited, people can create a more equitable and just society that reflects the democratic values that working people aspire to uphold as equal citizens and shareholders of democracy, state, and government. People’s democracy is the only form of sustainable democracy that working people needs to reclaim it to save their citizenship rights.
---
*London Metropolitan University

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

  By Rajiv Shah   This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.

Love letters in a lifelong war: Babusha Kohli’s resistance in verse

By Ravi Ranjan*  “War does not determine who is right—only who is left.” Bertrand Russell’s words echo hauntingly in our times, and few contemporary Hindi poets embody this truth as profoundly as Babusha Kohli. Emerging from Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Kohli has carved a unique space in literature by weaving together tenderness, protest, and philosophy across poetry, prose, and cinema. Her work is not merely artistic expression—it is resistance, refuge, and a call for peace.

Authoritarian destruction of the public sphere in Ecuador: Trumpism in action?

By Pilar Troya Fernández  The situation in Ecuador under Daniel Noboa's government is one of authoritarianism advancing on several fronts simultaneously to consolidate neoliberalism and total submission to the US international agenda. These are not isolated measures, but rather a coordinated strategy that combines job insecurity, the dismantling of the welfare state, unrestricted access to mining, the continuation of oil exploitation without environmental considerations, the centralization of power through the financial suffocation of local governments, and the systematic criminalization of all forms of opposition and popular organization.

The golden crop: How turmeric is transforming women's lives in tribal India

By Vikas Meshram*   When the lush green fields of turmeric sway in the tribal belt of southern Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, and Gujarat, it is not merely a spice crop — it is the golden glow of self-reliance. In villages where even basic spices once had to be bought from the market, the very soil today is yielding a prosperity that has transformed the lives of thousands of families. At the heart of this transformation is the initiative of Vaagdhara, which has linked turmeric with livelihoods, nutrition, and village self-governance — gram swaraj.

Echoes of Vietnam and Chile: The devastating cost of the I-A Axis in Iran

​ By Ram Puniyani  ​The recent joint military actions by Israel and the United States against Iran have been devastating. Like all wars, this conflict is brutal to its core, leaving a trail of human suffering in its wake. The stated pretext for this aggression—the brutality of the Ayatollah Khamenei regime and its nuclear ambitions—clashes sharply with the reality of the diplomatic landscape. Iran had expressed a willingness to remain at the negotiating table, signaling a readiness to concede points emerging from dialogue. 

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

The price of silence: Why Modi won’t follow Shastri, appeal for sacrifice

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey*  ​In 1965, as India grappled with war and a crippling food crisis, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri faced a United States that used wheat shipments under the PL-480 agreement as a lever to dictate Indian foreign policy. Shastri’s response remains legendary: he appealed to the nation to skip one meal a day. Millions of middle-class households complied, choosing temporary hunger over the sacrifice of national dignity. Today, India faces a modern equivalent in the energy sector, yet the leadership’s response stands in stark contrast to that era of self-reliance.

False claim? What Venezuela is witnessing is not surrender but a tactical retreat

By Manolo De Los Santos  The early morning hours of January 3, 2026, marked an inflection point in Venezuela and Latin America’s centuries-long struggle for self-determination and independence. Operation Absolute Resolve, ordered by the Trump administration, constituted the most brutal and direct military assault on a sovereign state in the region in recent memory. In a shocking operation that left hundreds dead, President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores were illegally kidnapped from Venezuelan soil and transported to the United States, where they now face fabricated charges in a New York federal detention facility. In the two months since this act of war, a torrent of speculation has emerged from so-called experts and pundits across the political spectrum. This has followed three main lines: One . The operation’s success indicated treason at the highest levels of the Bolivarian Revolution. Two . Acting President Delcy Rodríguez and the remaining leadership have abandone...