Skip to main content

'Bastar becoming warzone': Death of 2 children by mortar shell explosion

Couterview Desk 

The civil rights network* Forum Against Corporatization and Militarization (FACAM) has said the death of two children caused by the mortar shell explosion in Bijapur, Chhattisgarh, highlights the grim reality of the larger Bastar area turning into a warzone in the name of countering Maoism. 
Instead of taking responsibility for the incident which is a direct consequence of the "war on people for the sake of corporate interests", the authorities "have pinned the blame on the Maoists" and alleged that the mortar shell was "planted by them which caused the explosion."

Text: 

On 12th May 2024, two children, Laxman and Boti Oyam from Gurga village, Bijapur district were unfortunately killed in an explosion after they unknowingly triggered an unexploded mortar shell buried in the soil. The mortar shell was left in the spot after the Indian state’s paramilitary carried out heavy mortar shelling in the forests dangerously close to the villages. 
The explosion happened near forests of Odspara village, Bijapur district on the banks of Indravati river where the children, along with other adults from their village had gone to gather tendu leaves. While they were gathering the leaves, the children were throwing rocks around, one of which hit the mortar shell and triggered the explosion. Twenty children were present in the area, out of whom two were killed. 
The deaths of these children highlight the grim day-to-day reality of turning the larger Bastar area into a warzone in the name of countering Maoism. The villagers had anticipated this and had already requested the police to remove such unexploded mortar shells multiple times before this tragedy occurred.
Instead of taking responsibility for this loss of life, a direct consequence of the Indian state’s war on people for the sake of corporate interests, they have pinned the blame on the Maoists and alleged that it was an IED planted by them which caused the explosion. 
Villager testimonies and ground reports vehemently prove otherwise. FACAM had previously reported that on 13th April 2024, a combing operation by the paramilitary forces had occurred in Odspara village during which one Raje Oyam, an Adivasi peasant woman was shot dead. 
On a previous occasion in the same village, Ramesh Oyam, an Adivasi peasant, was shot dead when he was bathing in the Indravati river and on 13th April, one of the mortal shells fell into the vicinity of the deceased Ramesh Oyam’s house as well. 
It was reported that the explosive device that had led to the death of the children on 12th May 2024 looked exactly like the mortar shell left behind in the combing operation of the state. 
Furthermore, according to the villagers, the remnants of the explosive device had the serial numbers similar to the ones present in mortar shells used by security forces. The IED devices used by the Maoists are not as sophisticated as the explosive devices used by the state. The IED devices are usually country-made devices which are made using parts of a vehicle and other locally sourced parts. 
Mortar shells lying around in the forest is a grave threat to the existence and culture of Adivasi peasants
This shell, as reported by the villagers, was much more sophisticated. In fact, the villagers argue that the paramilitary forces did not even come to the village even after the children died and released the statement pinning these deaths on the Maoists without even visiting the village or talking to the villagers!
Mortar shelling of this magnitude against the people of their own country finds no justification in the Indian state’s Constitution and is a grave violation of the democratic rights it claims to uphold. 
Even in the case that the state claims that such measures are to combat the activities of the banned Communist Party of India (Maoist), the principle of proportionality must be applied wherein the Maoists are not employing any sort of armed activity in the same magnitude as the state’s, like those of aerial bombings and mortar shellings. 
There is no legal or moral argument that excuses the Indian state’s genocidal policies against the Adivasi peasants. Mortar shells lying around in the forest is a grave threat to the existence and culture of Adivasi peasants, who have to walk on eggshells in their own forest lands, with the lives of their children and their families being put at risk when they go into the forest to gather tendu leaves. 
Thus, the usage of mortar shells by the paramilitary must be stopped by the Indian state’s paramilitary forces. 
FACAM demands an end to the usage of mortar shells and aerial bombs which create a heightened threat to the existence of Adivasi peasants on their own forest lands and restricts their livelihood. 
FACAM demands an immediate judicial inquiry into the negligent murders of Laxman and Boti Oyam by the Indian state.
---
*All India Revolutionary Students Organization (AIRSO), All India Students Association (AISA), All India Revolutionary Women’s Organization (AIRWO), Ambedkar Student Association- DU (ASA-DU), Bhim Army Student Federation (BASF), Bhagat Singh Ambedkar Students Organization (BASO), Bhagat Singh Chhatra Ekta Manch (bsCEM), Collective, Common Teachers Forum (CTF), Democratic Students Union (DSU), Fraternity Movement, Nazariya Magazine, Progressive Lawyers Association (PLA), Mazdoor Adhikar Sangathan (MAS), Trade Union Centre of India (TUCI), Vishwavidyalaya Chhatra Federation (VCF)

Comments

Anonymous said…
What's the logic here ther is no law anywhere that states force should be minimal when dealing with naxalites or rebels bastar is already war zone since 1967 this logic doesn't make sense security forces should not use technology to counter maoaist because it's unfair and they are military weak

TRENDING

Civil society at a crossroads: Service delivery vs. rights in the fight for social change

Counterview News   In the latest episode of the podcast Unmute , hosts Gagan Sethi and Minar Pimple convened a profound conversation with two veteran development practitioners to dissect a persistent tension within civil society: the perceived divide between service delivery and the struggle for rights. The episode, titled "Beyond Service Delivery: Civil Society, Rights, and the Politics of Social Change," featured Apoorva Oza , a development practitioner with decades of experience in rural development and institution-building, and Professor Dipa Sinha , a development economist known for her work on food, nutrition, gender, and social policy.

Grain vs. gasoline: How the global biofuel boom threatens India’s food and water security

By Rajiv Shah  A new report published by the international research and advocacy organization GRAIN has warned that the global resurgence of biofuels is triggering a dangerous dynamic of “more fuel, less food, more land grabs.” Driven by intersecting energy security concerns, geopolitical tensions, and aggressive decarbonization mandates, the expanding agrofuel industry is increasingly pitting corporate energy interests against global food security and indigenous land rights. 

Sikkim governor row: ALIFA asks centre to explain hurried appointment in Ankita Bhandari case

By A Representative   The All-India Feminist Alliance (ALIFA) on Saturday expressed “immense pain and outrage” that even after four years and a national uproar, justice has not been fully delivered in the Ankita Bhandari murder case and that a ruling party politician facing allegations has been “gifted a high-ranking constitutional office.” In a statement, ALIFA extended “unflinching solidarity” to Ankita’s parents, who it said are “fighting for justice on the streets of Delhi,” and demanded that pending the CBI inquiry and judicial decision, the appointment of BJP leader Dushyant Kumar Gautam as Sikkim’s Governor be subject to “immediate presidential review.”