Skip to main content

Would China learn from British experience, allow other countries to live in peace?

 
By NS Venkataraman*
Several decades back, China aggressively entered Tibet, over powered the Tibetans who resisted China’s aggression and mercilessly massacred large number of Tibetans. Today, China is sitting pretty with full control over Tibet region and is hiding Tibet with an “iron curtain” from the eyes of the world. Outside China and probably within China, most people do not know what is really happening in Tibet at present.
After the onslaught on Tibet, with no worthwhile protest from other countries about China’s act of aggression, China appears to have convinced itself that it can have its way to satisfy its territorial greed by occupying other regions at its will.
China claims that Taiwan should be part of China, though there is no justification for this. Taiwan emerged as separate region after a civil war in China, and if China claims that Taiwan should belong to it, then Taiwan too can have equal claim that China should belong to it.
On several occasions, China has threatened to invade Taiwan to acquire it. However, unlike in the case of Tibet when China’s aggression over Tibet virtually went unchallenged, Taiwan region has the support of Western countries. This has prevented China from militarily operating against Taiwan, even as China’s territorial greed persists.
South China Sea is an area where China claims its sovereignty and is rejecting the claims of other countries including Philippines, Vietnam, Taiwan. China-Philippines tensions are now rising around a flash point in the South China Sea, due to China’s aggressive posture.
There is territorial dispute regarding the Senkaku Islands between Japan China and Taiwan. It is now claimed by China that Senkaku Islands belong to China and there is considerable tension in the region due to China’s claim and aggressive postures. China is not ready to discuss the issue and arrive at amicable solution.

Occupation of Indian territory:

China launched a war against India in the year 1962 and is now holding thousands of hectares of Indian territory as its own, which was occupied by China during the war. Frequently, China is creating issues in the border with India and skirmishes between Chinese and Indian soldiers are becoming frequent.
China now claims that Arunachal Pradesh in India should belong to China and is doing everything to stress it’s claim, short of going for full fledged war with India.
Recently, China has released a fourth list of thirty new names of various places in Arunachal Pradesh, amid China’s stepped up assertions in recent weeks to re emphasise its claim over the Indian state of Arunachal Pradesh.
The Chinese Civil Affairs Ministry released the first list of the standardised names of six places in “Zangnan” ( Name given by China for Arunachal PPrades) in 2017. The second list of 15 places was issued in 2021, followed by another list with names for 11 places in 2023.
Naming of places in India’s Arunachal Pradesh by China indicate the height of arrogance of the Chinese government and its confidence that it can do anything against other countries and get away with it.
Obviously, the unquenched territorial greed of China makes it behave with such aggressive postures against other countries.

Stranglehold over Pakistan:

By tempting and persuading Pakistan to implement the economic corridor project, China has extended huge loan to Pakistan to implement such projects, even as China knows that Pakistan would never be able to repay the loan and accrued interest in the foreseeable future. Thus, Pakistan has now become highly dependent on China and is indebted to it.
In the process, China has taken control of Gwadar port in Pakistan and is creating access to transport material from Gwadar port to China.
Obviously, China will never let go its vice like grip over Pakistan in future.

Take over Hambantota port in Sri Lanka:

Like what China has done in Pakistan, it has extended huge loan to Sri Lanka and implemented projects in Sri Lanka, which has benefited Chinese industries and economy of China, more than that of Sri Lanka.
With Sri Lanka facing a debt trap, China has taken over Hambantota port on 99 year lease from Sri Lanka in lieu of the loan that Sri Lanka has availed from China.
99 year lease is a very long period and the ground reality is that China will never give up its vice like grip over Hambantota port, which area ultimately may become an extended territory of China for all practical purposes.

What could be the ultimate limit of China’s greed?

It is generally said that the greed has no limits as such. The ultimate limit of greed would happen, when the level of greed would make an individual or a group or a country to over reach in satisfying the unquenched greed. Such scenario would cause huge resistance from the people in the affected regions, creating an insurmountable problem for the entity with the unquenched greed.
British empire, which expanded the territory under its control in different continents for several centuries, has lost all such territories and remain as one of many nations in the world now. Its past glory is now a matter of distant memory. China should derive the right lessons from the experience of British empire and China should allow other countries to live in peace.
---
*Trustee, Nandini Voice For The Deprived, Chennai

Comments

TRENDING

BRICS ends, but Bangladesh's empty chair says more than any declaration

By Nava Thakuria  The 18th BRICS Leaders' Summit, hosted by India at Bharat Mandapam in New Delhi on 12-13 September 2026, has concluded with leaders formally adopting the New Delhi Declaration. The gathering, themed "Building for Resilience, Innovation, Cooperation and Sustainability," drew Russian President Vladimir Putin, Chinese President Xi Jinping, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and other leaders of the now 11-member bloc, along with heads of partner organisations such as ASEAN, the African Union and the Eurasian Economic Union. Diplomats had worked through the final hours to bridge differences — notably between Iran and the UAE over West Asian tensions — before the declaration was signed.

Swaminarayan, untouchability and the 'we are not Hindu' argument

By Rajiv Shah   Following my blog on why the Eiffel Tower authorities should take all the blame for giving in to the Swaminarayan sadhus ’ bizarre demand to “invisibilise” women, including its female staff, during their visit to the internationally renowned Paris tourist centre on September 5, an interesting comment by one of the top academics drew my attention to something I vaguely knew about one of India’s most powerful and richest religious sects.

BAPS, the Eiffel Tower and the curious silence on secularism

By Rajiv Shah   I was a little surprised to see how some of those whom I respect for taking a firm stand on patriarchal issues reacted to the manner in which they responded to the recent incident in Paris, in which women employees of the Eiffel Tower were asked to remain "invisible" on September 5 when 100 BAPS sadhus visited one of the world's top tourist destinations.