Skip to main content

Katchatheevu between India and Sri Lanka: Let it not become a point of friction

By NS Venkataraman* 
 Katchatheevu,  a 285-acre uninhabited island in the Palk Strait, between India and Sri Lanka and  about 33 km from the Indian coast,   has suddenly become a  matter of acrimonious debate, in India today, as Indian parliamentary elections will take place in the next few days.
There have  been claim by both Sri Lanka and India, both of which were under British rule for several centuries, about the ownership of Katchatheevu for very long time.  Finally, a settlement  was reached in the year 1974, when Government of India agreed that Katchatheevu would be part of Sri Lanka, which mean that India has given  up it’s claim on Katchatheevu.
While it was thought that the matter has been settled once for all, there have been considerable unhappiness about this decision of Government of India amongst the fishing community in the coastal region in Tamil Nadu,  who have been using the Katchatheevu island for resting and drying their nets etc.  for several decades.
Election time issue
Meanwhile, some political parties in Tamil Nadu have been demanding that Katchatheevu should be claimed back by India. This thoughtless  demand has not been considered by the Government of India, and obviously this demand cannot be considered in future also. 
What is the reason for this Katchatheevu matter erupting into an explosive discussion in India today?
The reason is that the ruling party  (DMK) in Tamil Nadu  has been demanding that Katchatheevu should be retrieved and has written several letters to the Prime Minister reiterating this demand.   The DMK made it an electoral issue,  whipping up passion, particularly amongst fishermen, as a strategy for vote bank politics in the ongoing election season in India.
In this scenario, Prime Minister has pointed out that the decision to give up rights on Katchatheevu was taken by the then  Indian  Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, with the full knowledge of the then DMK Chief Minister in Tamil Nadu, and for all practical purposes then DMK government then did not protest and its members in Parliament remained silent on the matter.
The essence of the accusation of Prime Minister Modi is that while present DMK government in Tamil Nadu is demanding that Katchatheevu should be taken back by India, the fact is that it was the then DMK government and the then Congress government    who  took the decision to give up the claim on Katchatheevu.  
Further, the document released under  the  Right to Information Act reveals that the approval  of Parliament was not obtained before giving up the claim on Katchatheevu and Parliament was only informed later.
What is to be noted here is the ongoing bitter debate in India on Katchatheevu is debate between political parties in India.  Nowhere has the Indian Prime Minister or Indian Foreign Minister has stated that Katchatheevu would be taken back by India,  though some political parties in Tamil Nadu are trying to  misinterpret for political convenience to state  that Government of India would take back Katchatheevu island in future.
Need for holistic approach
It is well recognised in India that Indian fishermen face some issues, as they cannot utilise the Katchatheevu island  to carry out the fishing activity, as they were doing earlier before the year 1974.
What is required is that both Government of India and Sri Lankan government need to take a holistic view of the matter in approaching the issue,  particularly keeping in view the common interests of both the countries and historical,  traditional  and cultural relationship  between both the countries. A matured discussion between Indian government and  Sri Lankan government can certainly find a way,   that can  elegantly find a solution,  keeping the interests of fishermen in India and Sri Lanka. 
In all probability this heated discussion on Katchatheevu in India would last only till 4th of June, 2024 when the result of the parliamentary election would be declared in India.
When the dust would settle down,  an appropriate solution can be certainly arrived at.
Unfortunately, in the democratic set up in India and Sri Lanka, often politicians and  owners of some media  houses and a few journalists with vested interests   say and write provocatively to keep the issue burning  to serve their narrow political interest.
Anyway, the discerning observers both in India and Sri Lanka realise that both the countries need to have healthy and good relationships for mutual benefits. It is hoped that the Indian Prime Minister  who started the current heated discussion to expose Tamil Nadu’s ruling party DMK’s double game,  must   tone down,  to create appropriate climate for  discussions with Sri Lanka. The Sri Lankan government also should not overreact  and understand the trends and utterances  during the  election period,  which seem to be similar both in India and Sri Lanka.
---
*Trustee, Nandini Voice For The Deprived, Chennai

Comments

TRENDING

The golden crop: How turmeric is transforming women's lives in tribal India

By Vikas Meshram*   When the lush green fields of turmeric sway in the tribal belt of southern Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, and Gujarat, it is not merely a spice crop — it is the golden glow of self-reliance. In villages where even basic spices once had to be bought from the market, the very soil today is yielding a prosperity that has transformed the lives of thousands of families. At the heart of this transformation is the initiative of Vaagdhara, which has linked turmeric with livelihoods, nutrition, and village self-governance — gram swaraj.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Authoritarian destruction of the public sphere in Ecuador: Trumpism in action?

By Pilar Troya Fernández  The situation in Ecuador under Daniel Noboa's government is one of authoritarianism advancing on several fronts simultaneously to consolidate neoliberalism and total submission to the US international agenda. These are not isolated measures, but rather a coordinated strategy that combines job insecurity, the dismantling of the welfare state, unrestricted access to mining, the continuation of oil exploitation without environmental considerations, the centralization of power through the financial suffocation of local governments, and the systematic criminalization of all forms of opposition and popular organization.

Echoes of Vietnam and Chile: The devastating cost of the I-A Axis in Iran

​ By Ram Puniyani  ​The recent joint military actions by Israel and the United States against Iran have been devastating. Like all wars, this conflict is brutal to its core, leaving a trail of human suffering in its wake. The stated pretext for this aggression—the brutality of the Ayatollah Khamenei regime and its nuclear ambitions—clashes sharply with the reality of the diplomatic landscape. Iran had expressed a willingness to remain at the negotiating table, signaling a readiness to concede points emerging from dialogue. 

False claim? What Venezuela is witnessing is not surrender but a tactical retreat

By Manolo De Los Santos  The early morning hours of January 3, 2026, marked an inflection point in Venezuela and Latin America’s centuries-long struggle for self-determination and independence. Operation Absolute Resolve, ordered by the Trump administration, constituted the most brutal and direct military assault on a sovereign state in the region in recent memory. In a shocking operation that left hundreds dead, President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores were illegally kidnapped from Venezuelan soil and transported to the United States, where they now face fabricated charges in a New York federal detention facility. In the two months since this act of war, a torrent of speculation has emerged from so-called experts and pundits across the political spectrum. This has followed three main lines: One . The operation’s success indicated treason at the highest levels of the Bolivarian Revolution. Two . Acting President Delcy Rodríguez and the remaining leadership have abandone...

The selective memory of a violent city: Uttam Nagar and the invisible victims of Delhi

By Sunil Kumar*  Hundreds of murders take place in Delhi every year, yet only a few incidents become topics of nationwide discussion. The question is: why does this happen? Today, the incident in Uttam Nagar has become the centre of national debate. A 26-year-old man, Tarun Kumar, was killed following a dispute that reportedly began after a balloon hit a small child. In several colonies of Delhi, slogans such as “Jai Shri Ram” and “Vande Mataram” are being raised while demanding the death penalty for Tarun’s killers. As a result, nearly 50,000 residents of Hastsal JJ Colony are now living in what resembles a state of confinement. 

The price of silence: Why Modi won’t follow Shastri, appeal for sacrifice

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey*  ​In 1965, as India grappled with war and a crippling food crisis, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri faced a United States that used wheat shipments under the PL-480 agreement as a lever to dictate Indian foreign policy. Shastri’s response remains legendary: he appealed to the nation to skip one meal a day. Millions of middle-class households complied, choosing temporary hunger over the sacrifice of national dignity. Today, India faces a modern equivalent in the energy sector, yet the leadership’s response stands in stark contrast to that era of self-reliance.

Love letters in a lifelong war: Babusha Kohli’s resistance in verse

By Ravi Ranjan*  “War does not determine who is right—only who is left.” Bertrand Russell’s words echo hauntingly in our times, and few contemporary Hindi poets embody this truth as profoundly as Babusha Kohli. Emerging from Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Kohli has carved a unique space in literature by weaving together tenderness, protest, and philosophy across poetry, prose, and cinema. Her work is not merely artistic expression—it is resistance, refuge, and a call for peace.