Skip to main content

Relations with India: Some quarters wrongly criticizing Bangladesh for being China-tilting

By Prithwi Raj Chaturvedi* 

Bangladesh and India have a unique relationship not only due to their geographical proximity but also because of their same socioeconomic background, shared history, and common culture. The Liberation War in 1971 also resulted in the formation of a blood connection between the two countries, a phenomenon that is noteworthy for its rarity. Since then, both countries have maintained a long and productive diplomatic relationship in the areas of politics, culture, trade, and business.
Bangladesh plays a significant role in India's Neighborhood First policy. Delhi under Narendra Modi has always supported its dependable friend, Bangladesh, whether it was prioritizing COVID vaccination delivery or arranging an evacuation of Bangladeshis trapped in the Russia-Ukraine war. Similar to this, Bangladesh, under the leadership of Sheikh Hasina, has won Indian hearts by addressing all of their concerns, from connectivity to security.
Indian nationals have expressed confidence in Hasina's management of terrorist operations in Bangladesh. The post-2009 crackdown on Northeast Indian separatists by the Hasina government has been the single most important factor that has led to a huge drop in insurgency in the NE region—an 80 percent drop in rebel violence, according to the latest report of the Indian Home Ministry. Ms. Hasina succeeded in apprehending the cross-border anti-Indian insurgency groups and turning them over to Indian authorities, thanks to her administrative prowess.
However, after coming to a settlement on matters relating to maritime delimitation, land border arrangements, enclaves, sea shipping, and inland waterways, both nations are now at a favorable point in their diplomatic ties. Since the Sheikh Hasina government came to power in 2009, trade ties with India have greatly improved, with Bangladesh now India's largest trading partner in South Asia. In 2021–22, the total trade between India and Bangladesh was worth $16.38 billion, with India exporting goods worth $14.58 billion and importing goods worth $1.8 billion.
In an advancement of bilateral relations, Bangladesh and India signed a Framework Agreement on Cooperation for Development, under which both parties agreed to narrow trade imbalances and expand their cooperation to the sub-regional level. Both countries are now working towards signing a Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA), which emphasizes three specific dimensions: trade in goods, services, and investments.
Both governments have recently undertaken initiatives to boost connectivity. Multi-modal transit between the Indian mainland and the country’s northeast is increasingly becoming a reality with the development of ‘connectivity infrastructure’ by Bangladesh. Indian businessmen invested in Bangladesh’s garment industry are looking to expand their manufacturing to Tripura, opening fresh vistas for industrialization in the Northeast. Agartala, emerging as India’s third internet gateway due to its connection with Bangladesh’s internet backbone, now offers a huge opportunity for the growth of the IT industry in the Northeast.
In the past eight years, India has extended credit lines worth $8 billion to Bangladesh for developmental projects in sectors including roadways, shipping, ports, and railways. This makes Bangladesh the recipient of India’s largest concessional credit lines to a single country around the world. India's projects in Bangladesh include an upgrade of the Ashuganj river port and the Akhaura land port road, with a credit line of more than $400 million. A road project connecting the India-Bangladesh border is also being worked upon, with a further line of credit worth $80 million from India.
However, it is not only the trade and economic aspects that make the relations between the two countries a role model for the world, but rather their mutual trust, respect, and win-win cooperation. The Indian prime minister has always had positive relations with Bangladesh as a result of the goodwill gestures made by PM Sheikh Hasina. PM Modi, in one of his first foreign visits after the COVID-19 outbreak, visited Bangladesh to participate in its Golden Jubilee of Independence.
In spite of such a level of engagement between the two governments, some quarters are criticizing Bangladesh, terming it a ‘China-Tilting’ country, without giving any specific data or analysis. There is a misperception among many people that Bangladesh could fall into the Chinese debt trap, which is baseless. Bangladesh has decades of experience managing aid and loans, working with a variety of bilateral and multilateral funders. Bangladesh has received most of its loans from international agencies, with Japan being the largest bilateral lender (19%).
Clearly, Bangladesh’s external loan portfolio is dominated by the World Bank, which accounts for 36% of total external loans, and the Asian Development Bank, which accounts for 23%. Of the $72.3 billion foreign loan, the World Bank accounts for $18.2 billion, followed by the Asian Development Bank ($13.3 billion), Japan ($9.2 billion), Russia ($5.1 billion), China ($4.8 billion), and India ($1.02 billion). The data clearly shows that Bangladesh's loan from China is a trifling amount compared with the country's GDP of $416 billion. Bangladesh has a low risk of external and overall debt distress despite higher external borrowing in recent terms, said the International Monetary Fund in February.
Again, Bangladesh’s relations with China are only based on trade and commerce. Chinese projects in Bangladesh are mainly in infrastructure building, the energy and power sector, transportation networks, and municipal services. It is observed that Bangladesh is aware of geopolitical sensitivities and takes on Chinese projects that have economic viability. Previously, it cancelled several China-proposed projects due to a lack of commercial feasibility. For example, Bangladesh did not allow a 14 billion USD Chinese investment in the Sonadia deep sea port as Japan's proposed Matarbari was more viable. Two railway projects worth a total of 3.5 billion USD were also scrapped by the Bangladeshi authority due to their lower financial viability.
Reports claimed that, over the past decades, Bangladesh has received $2.6 billion in FDI from China. However, in recent months, the inflow of Chinese foreign direct investment (FDI) in Bangladesh has been low compared to other major development partners. China is the 5th largest source of FDI behind the USA, UK, Singapore, and South Korea in FY 2022–23.
The above-mentioned data and graphs indicate that the allegation suggested and accepted by many pundits that Bangladesh is tilting towards China is only hype. Unlike Pakistan and Sri Lanka, Bangladesh has conducted prudent macro-economic management in order to avoid China’s overdependence. Bangladesh seems aware that if it falls short of China’s debt diplomacy, it will be a huge loss for India because an economically strong Bangladesh is an asset for India. So, even an economic downslide due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine war couldn’t drive Dhaka into China’s influence.
On the other hand, the steady growth of the India-Bangladesh bilateral partnership proves that India-Bangladesh ties being a role model of good neighborhood diplomacy is not a shallow statement made by Sheikh Hasina to present a certain idea of the bilateral relationship. It is rather a strong testimony to the power of cooperation that can lead to mutually beneficial relations while also elevating their economic, social, and political statuses in the global forum. Finally, the contributions of the Sheikh Hasina government to nurturing the special ‘bonding’ need to be acknowledged.
---
*Researcher and Political analyst, New Delhi

Comments

TRENDING

Gujarat Information Commission issues warning against misinterpretation of RTI orders

By A Representative   The Gujarat Information Commission (GIC) has issued a press note clarifying that its orders limiting the number of Right to Information (RTI) applications for certain individuals apply only to those specific applicants. The GIC has warned that it will take disciplinary action against any public officials who misinterpret these orders to deny information to other citizens. The press note, signed by GIC Secretary Jaideep Dwivedi, states that the Right to Information Act, 2005, is a powerful tool for promoting transparency and accountability in public administration. However, the commission has observed that some applicants are misusing the act by filing an excessive number of applications, which disproportionately consumes the time and resources of Public Information Officers (PIOs), First Appellate Authorities (FAAs), and the commission itself. This misuse can cause delays for genuine applicants seeking justice. In response to this issue, and in acc...

'MGNREGA crisis deepening': NSM demands fair wages and end to digital exclusions

By A Representative   The NREGA Sangharsh Morcha (NSM), a coalition of independent unions of MGNREGA workers, has warned that the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) is facing a “severe crisis” due to persistent neglect and restrictive measures imposed by the Union Government.

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

Gandhiji quoted as saying his anti-untouchability view has little space for inter-dining with "lower" castes

By A Representative A senior activist close to Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA) leader Medha Patkar has defended top Booker prize winning novelist Arundhati Roy’s controversial utterance on Gandhiji that “his doctrine of nonviolence was based on an acceptance of the most brutal social hierarchy the world has ever known, the caste system.” Surprised at the police seeking video footage and transcript of Roy’s Mahatma Ayyankali memorial lecture at the Kerala University on July 17, Nandini K Oza in a recent blog quotes from available sources to “prove” that Gandhiji indeed believed in “removal of untouchability within the caste system.”

Targeted eviction of Bengali-speaking Muslims across Assam districts alleged

By A Representative   A delegation led by prominent academic and civil rights leader Sandeep Pandey  visited three districts in Assam—Goalpara, Dhubri, and Lakhimpur—between 2 and 4 September 2025 to meet families affected by recent demolitions and evictions. The delegation reported widespread displacement of Bengali-speaking Muslim communities, many of whom possess valid citizenship documents including Aadhaar, voter ID, ration cards, PAN cards, and NRC certification. 

Subject to geological upheaval, the time to listen to the Himalayas has already passed

By Rajkumar Sinha*  The people of Uttarakhand and Himachal Pradesh, who have somehow survived the onslaught of reckless development so far, are crying out in despair that within the next ten to fifteen years their very existence will vanish. If one carefully follows the news coming from these two Himalayan states these days, this painful cry does not appear exaggerated. How did these prosperous and peaceful states reach such a tragic condition? What feats of our policymakers and politicians pushed these states to the brink of destruction?

India's health workers have no legal right for their protection, regrets NGO network

Counterview Desk In a letter to Union labour and employment minister Santosh Gangwar, the civil rights group Occupational and Environmental Health Network of India (OEHNI), writing against the backdrop of strike by Bhabha hospital heath care workers, has insisted that they should be given “clear legal right for their protection”.

Rally in Patna: Non-farmer bodies to highlight plight of agriculture in Eastern India ahead of march to Parliament

P Sainath By  A  Representative Ahead of the march to Parliament on November 29-30, 2018, organized by over 210 farmer and agricultural worker organisations of the country demanding a 21-day special session of Parliament to deliberate on remedial measures for safeguarding the interest of farm, farmers and agricultural workers, a mass rally been organized for November 23, Gandhi Sangrahalaya (Gandhi Museum), Gandhi Maidan, Patna. Say the organizers, the Eastern region merits special attention, because, while crisis of farmers and agricultural workers in Western, Southern and Northern India has received some attention in the media and central legislature, the plight of those in the Eastern region of the country (Bihar, Jharkhand, West Bengal, Orissa, Chhattisgarh and Eastern UP) has remained on the margins. To be addressed by P Sainath, founder of People’s Archive of Rural India (PARI), a statement issued ahead of the rally says, the Eastern India was the most prosperous regi...

'Centre criminally negligent': SKM demands national disaster declaration in flood-hit states

By A Representative   The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has urged the Centre to immediately declare the recent floods and landslides in Punjab, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir, Uttarakhand, and Haryana as a national disaster, warning that the delay in doing so has deepened the suffering of the affected population.