Skip to main content

World must acknowledge 1971 Bangladesh genocide, declare March 25 as Genocide Day

By Animesh Paul*

Recently the European Parliament organized an event titled 'The Forgotten Genocide: Bangladesh 1971'. The event was organized to convey the message that the atrocities perpetrated by the Pakistan Army and its local allies 52 years ago cannot be ignored in any way. Undeniably, the Bangladesh genocide was one of the worst such events in human history. 
The killings, rapes, and other atrocities became widely known at the time. Yet, just as governments at the time were slow to recognize the democratic legitimacy of a free Bangladesh, the international community has still not acknowledged the genocide. Today the Bangladesh genocide has become a forgotten chapter in history. To remember and recognize the sacrifice, this event is an important step toward international recognition of the genocide in Bangladesh.

The Forgotten Genocide: Bangladesh 1971

The Hague-based international human rights organization, Global Human Rights Defense organized a conference at the European Parliament. At the conference, the organization tried to convince MEPs and the wider community that the time had come to recognize the 1971 genocide. Member of the European Parliament (MEP) Fulvio Martusillo took the initiative and organized the event in the European Parliament.
However, in his absence, his representative, communication expert Giuliana FranƧoisa, spoke on his behalf. MEP Isabella Adinolfi discussed the brutality faced by Bengali women during the 1971 genocide. While concluding her address, Isabella Adinolfi conveyed Martusciello's message: "It's time for the EU to recognize what happened in Bangladesh as a crime against humanity, more than 50 years after the nation was plunged into blood and tyranny,"
In 1971, the death of 3 million people, the rape of 2 million women, the displacement of 10 million people, and the displacement of nearly 30 million people to India shocked the world. London's Sunday Times recognized this incident as a massacre. 8 months, 2 weeks, and 6 days of horrible scenarios were experienced by the nation. The genocide has had a tremendous effect on Bangladesh as a whole. It is highly necessary to have a comprehensive knowledge of both the past and the present to satisfy the need for recognition.

Revisiting the Past of the Bangladesh Genocide of 1971

The division of Asia's subcontinent into India, West Pakistan, and East Pakistan (modern-day Bangladesh) came as the British Empire was ending in 1947. It was believed that West Pakistan was the more prominent, ruling faction. As a result, East Pakistan was used as a source of raw materials, funding, and labor to assist West Pakistan.
East Pakistan demanded independence because it would not put up with such oppression. With Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, the newly elected Awami League leader, citizens in Bangladesh were given the authority to carry out the task of achieving independence. By their opposition, Chief Martial Law Administrator and former Pakistani army commander Yahya Khan, president of West Pakistan, became concerned. He used dictatorial military methods when working with the then-President of the United States, Richard Nixon.
The genocide in Bangladesh began on March 25, 1971, with the launch of Operation Searchlight. The operation's initial goal was to keep Pakistan's dictatorial rule over Bangladesh's self-determination-minded people, and its targets included activists, academics, and soldiers. They weren't the only victims, though. As millions of people experienced the traumatic reality of relocation, financial instability, trauma, and death, a humanitarian catastrophe erupted.
An article in the Time magazine, published in August 1971, quoted a US official who referred to the anti-Bengali racism as being the fuel that made the soldiers "willing executioners". The chilling accounts of Archer K Blood, the US consul general in Dhaka at the time, describe the horrific sight of bodies of women who had been raped, shot, and hung by the heels in the ceilings of Rokeya Hall. There were other foreign correspondents on the ground, such as Simon Dring and Mark Tully, who reported extensively on Pakistani brutalities.
By the beginning of December 1971, Pakistani soldiers had started to retaliate, murdering about 1,000 powerful and intelligent Bangladeshis. But when tensions between India and West Pakistan reached their breaking point on December 16, 1971, West Pakistan's military forces immediately surrendered, and Bangladesh subsequently got independence. Years after years passed by, but no signs of apology were seen by Pakistan. Even International Crimes Tribunal in Bangladesh addressed some crimes, Pakistan, the country whose military establishment is accountable for the genocide organization, has neither recognized its responsibilities nor acted to punish the culprits.

Genocide: Unforgotten, Reoccurring, and Unacceptable

It is not acceptable for Bangladeshis to be the only ones who recall the past while everyone else ignores it. The United Nations has made many attempts to acknowledge the genocide of Bangladeshis. Sanchita Haque, the deputy permanent representative in Geneva, has urged that the Bangladesh Genocide of 1971 be officially recognized to make the Pakistani Army responsible for its previous atrocities and fatalities. Since the UN oversees genocidal crime prevention and punishment, the UN may take measures to allay Haque's worries. This would not only explain one of history's most horrific occurrences, but it would also reinforce tolerance of human diversity because the past still affects us now.
Cutting it requires extensive diplomatic initiatives and activities. America has recognized the Rohingya genocide. So why is a barbaric chapter of history not recognized on March 25? The United Nations Coffee Annan Commission called it ethnic cleansing. But more than that hundred percent genocide has happened in Bangladesh. There are those reports in the US press. Senators and Congressmen of the time also have statements.
To recognize the genocide, the parliaments of different countries should pass Genocide Day on March 25. World public opinion must be formed. Then the United Nations should proceed with it extensively. And for this, the government, expatriate Bangladeshis, and various organizations must work together. If we want to do this, we have to face the opposition of Pakistan, as well as the countries that were in opposition to the liberation war of Bangladesh.
Although the opportunity to observe International Genocide Day on March 25 has been missed, efforts must now continue to recognize nine months of genocide. International recognition of the 1971 Genocide will certainly be achieved if the Bangladesh government makes a sincere effort and the Ministry of External Affairs takes very strong diplomatic steps accordingly.
At the Brussels event, diplomats, journalists, academics, politicians, and members of the Bangladeshi community in Belgium gathered to hear recognition of the genocide and for an apology from Pakistan for the brutalities committed by its military and local collaborators. They heard testimony and powerful calls and justifications from scholars and survivors, who believe that the case for acknowledging genocide must be made and should be obvious. We hope to end our wait for a hearing, even after half a century as the world must acknowledge this 1971 genocide.
---
*Writer, Translator and Human Rights Activist

Comments

TRENDING

The golden crop: How turmeric is transforming women's lives in tribal India

By Vikas Meshram*   When the lush green fields of turmeric sway in the tribal belt of southern Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, and Gujarat, it is not merely a spice crop — it is the golden glow of self-reliance. In villages where even basic spices once had to be bought from the market, the very soil today is yielding a prosperity that has transformed the lives of thousands of families. At the heart of this transformation is the initiative of Vaagdhara, which has linked turmeric with livelihoods, nutrition, and village self-governance — gram swaraj.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Authoritarian destruction of the public sphere in Ecuador: Trumpism in action?

By Pilar Troya FernĆ”ndez  The situation in Ecuador under Daniel Noboa's government is one of authoritarianism advancing on several fronts simultaneously to consolidate neoliberalism and total submission to the US international agenda. These are not isolated measures, but rather a coordinated strategy that combines job insecurity, the dismantling of the welfare state, unrestricted access to mining, the continuation of oil exploitation without environmental considerations, the centralization of power through the financial suffocation of local governments, and the systematic criminalization of all forms of opposition and popular organization.

Echoes of Vietnam and Chile: The devastating cost of the I-A Axis in Iran

​ By Ram Puniyani  ​The recent joint military actions by Israel and the United States against Iran have been devastating. Like all wars, this conflict is brutal to its core, leaving a trail of human suffering in its wake. The stated pretext for this aggression—the brutality of the Ayatollah Khamenei regime and its nuclear ambitions—clashes sharply with the reality of the diplomatic landscape. Iran had expressed a willingness to remain at the negotiating table, signaling a readiness to concede points emerging from dialogue. 

False claim? What Venezuela is witnessing is not surrender but a tactical retreat

By Manolo De Los Santos  The early morning hours of January 3, 2026, marked an inflection point in Venezuela and Latin America’s centuries-long struggle for self-determination and independence. Operation Absolute Resolve, ordered by the Trump administration, constituted the most brutal and direct military assault on a sovereign state in the region in recent memory. In a shocking operation that left hundreds dead, President NicolĆ”s Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores were illegally kidnapped from Venezuelan soil and transported to the United States, where they now face fabricated charges in a New York federal detention facility. In the two months since this act of war, a torrent of speculation has emerged from so-called experts and pundits across the political spectrum. This has followed three main lines: One . The operation’s success indicated treason at the highest levels of the Bolivarian Revolution. Two . Acting President Delcy RodrĆ­guez and the remaining leadership have abandone...

The selective memory of a violent city: Uttam Nagar and the invisible victims of Delhi

By Sunil Kumar*  Hundreds of murders take place in Delhi every year, yet only a few incidents become topics of nationwide discussion. The question is: why does this happen? Today, the incident in Uttam Nagar has become the centre of national debate. A 26-year-old man, Tarun Kumar, was killed following a dispute that reportedly began after a balloon hit a small child. In several colonies of Delhi, slogans such as “Jai Shri Ram” and “Vande Mataram” are being raised while demanding the death penalty for Tarun’s killers. As a result, nearly 50,000 residents of Hastsal JJ Colony are now living in what resembles a state of confinement. 

The price of silence: Why Modi won’t follow Shastri, appeal for sacrifice

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey*  ​In 1965, as India grappled with war and a crippling food crisis, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri faced a United States that used wheat shipments under the PL-480 agreement as a lever to dictate Indian foreign policy. Shastri’s response remains legendary: he appealed to the nation to skip one meal a day. Millions of middle-class households complied, choosing temporary hunger over the sacrifice of national dignity. Today, India faces a modern equivalent in the energy sector, yet the leadership’s response stands in stark contrast to that era of self-reliance.

Love letters in a lifelong war: Babusha Kohli’s resistance in verse

By Ravi Ranjan*  “War does not determine who is right—only who is left.” Bertrand Russell’s words echo hauntingly in our times, and few contemporary Hindi poets embody this truth as profoundly as Babusha Kohli. Emerging from Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Kohli has carved a unique space in literature by weaving together tenderness, protest, and philosophy across poetry, prose, and cinema. Her work is not merely artistic expression—it is resistance, refuge, and a call for peace.