Skip to main content

Political chaos, conflict, violence around West Bengal Panchayat elections 2023

By Harasankar Adhikari 

In representative democracy, an election is the most important democratic tool for the selection of representatives from the lower to upper houses. In India, an election is considered as the ‘vote festival’ because of people’s active participation, whether voters are politically aware or not about their democratic rights. It might also be an important question for all. People participate because they want to gain something as per their desires. However, in this democracy, the opposition is the vital pillar of the government because the opposition’s involvement, role, and responsibility also determine the success or failure of a government.
The filing of a nomination of candidature in the election is the first step of the electoral process. We observe in the concurrent Panchayat Election of West Bengal, 2023 that there is a political warming throughout the state in relation to the filing of nominations. Every day, political chaos, conflict, violence, injury, and murders are taking place. The political party in power is trying to oppose the filing of nominations by other parties through open violence and torture. The state Election Commission is also acting according to the will of the ruling party. Even, the said commission is deliberately and desperately ignoring the recent verdict in relation to the Panchayat Election, 2023. It is a repetition of the earlier Panchayat Election, 2018. Ms. Mamata Banerjee also criticises the verdict openly in her public address. The chief legislature of the state is ignoring the judiciary. Then what would be the action of the general mass regarding the judiciary. It is surprising to note that the ruling government has taken various development packages/incentives from the very beginning of the journey. The packages even include compensation/incentives for rape victims and the families of poisonous liquor victims. The political party in power and the Department of Information and Culture publicise that Bengal is floating with the tide of development. They are sceptical that this development is for the people, by the people, or of the people. Are these packages of development dependent on the rule of dominance?
Why is this political party afraid of voters? Does it read the voters’ psychology and their opinion, which might be against this party?
Tactically, this political party is creating an environment of political warming in which voters are afraid to think alternatively about their rights. Hooliganism during the filing of nominations is the only way to keep voters away from the booths. Another tactic is that due to this political warming, when a voter tries to reach the booth, he or she will never think of any alternative because of fear and its daring consequences.
The police administration is the silent spectator. It has worn a special lens that prevents it from seeing anything. It only takes steps against the opposition of the government because this is the absolute order of the supreme.
Global warming changes the climate globally, and we are facing its consequences every day. Will this political warming bring changes to Bengal’s societal environment, and what will be its impacts? That might be thought about again and again, and what will be the future of our democracy? People might be waiting for a new law on "rights to what they (political parties) like".

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Hoping against despair after Myanmar President’s visit to India

By Nava Thakuria  Myanmar President U Min Aung Hlaing’s five-day official visit to India from 30 May to 3 June 2026 drew attention both in New Delhi and in India’s northeastern region, where policymakers and residents closely follow developments in the neighbouring country. The visit was significant because it touched on several issues of mutual concern, including security cooperation, border management, connectivity projects, trade, and regional stability.

Beyond data: The economist who refused to remain in the ivory tower

By Vikas Meshram   There are few people who are born into privilege yet choose to dedicate their lives to the cause of the poor. Jean Drèze is one such individual. Born on January 22, 1959, in Leuven, Belgium, into the family of a distinguished economist, Drèze has become one of the most influential voices in the study of poverty, inequality, and social policy in India. Having lived in India since 1979, he adopted Indian citizenship in 2002 and has since played a pivotal role in shaping some of the country's most important welfare initiatives.