Skip to main content

Joshimath landslide: Tapovan Vishnugad hydel project’s tunnel not responsible?

By Shankar Sharma* 

It seems very illogical for the National Thermal Power Corporation (NTPC) to even thinking of coming up with such a statement. No one expected it to admit the responsibility, as this news link seeks to suggest: Tapovan Vishnugad hydel project’s tunnel not responsible for landslide in Joshimath: NTPC.
Has there ever been a case wherein any agency of the government (or even a private entity even in a case like that of Bhopal gas tragedy) admitting its responsibility? Even in case of nuclear disasters at Chernobyl and Fukushima, no government has admitted its responsibility. 
 Only because of the public pressure and the intervention by the judiciary, some sort of responsibility/ obligation might have been assigned. But the massive impacts to the affected communities have not been averted, and adequate compensation has always been evasive.
If only the concerned agencies/ authorities are honest in applying their minds to the true welfare of our people, and also heeded to the timely precautions/ warning by the stakeholders and the domain experts, such disasters could have been averted and/ or the impacts minimised. 
 But sadly, in all such cases the true welfare of the project affected communities has not been at the focus of diligent consideration; even if ever such a focus has been feasible for the concerned authorities.
As it has always been, the focus continues to be the commercial benefits/ convenience/ luxury considerations of some distant sections of people at enormous costs to the locals. Some of the associated news reports, as in the links below, should indicate how our authorities have become insensitive to our people's true welfare. 
 If our authorities were to have diligently considered the true costs and benefits of such projects, especially in the case of of Tapovan Vishnugad hydel project, and honestly considered various alternatives available to our country to meet the legitimate demand for electricity, many such disasters, including this particular disaster of long lasting impacts, could have been and can be averted.
Can we hope that such critical wisdom will prevail in the future; especially in the context that there are scores of such high risk/ high impact projects, such as dam based and nuclear based power projects, are in the pipeline?
Can we hope that the concerns of the project affected communities, other stake holders, and domain experts will be diligently considered, and that all their concerns are satisfactorily addressed before pursuing with such obviously high risk projects? See the links below:
---
*Power & Climate Policy Analyst

Comments

TRENDING

BRICS ends, but Bangladesh's empty chair says more than any declaration

By Nava Thakuria  The 18th BRICS Leaders' Summit, hosted by India at Bharat Mandapam in New Delhi on 12-13 September 2026, has concluded with leaders formally adopting the New Delhi Declaration. The gathering, themed "Building for Resilience, Innovation, Cooperation and Sustainability," drew Russian President Vladimir Putin, Chinese President Xi Jinping, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and other leaders of the now 11-member bloc, along with heads of partner organisations such as ASEAN, the African Union and the Eurasian Economic Union. Diplomats had worked through the final hours to bridge differences — notably between Iran and the UAE over West Asian tensions — before the declaration was signed.

Swaminarayan, untouchability and the 'we are not Hindu' argument

By Rajiv Shah   Following my blog on why the Eiffel Tower authorities should take all the blame for giving in to the Swaminarayan sadhus ’ bizarre demand to “invisibilise” women, including its female staff, during their visit to the internationally renowned Paris tourist centre on September 5, an interesting comment by one of the top academics drew my attention to something I vaguely knew about one of India’s most powerful and richest religious sects.

BAPS, the Eiffel Tower and the curious silence on secularism

By Rajiv Shah   I was a little surprised to see how some of those whom I respect for taking a firm stand on patriarchal issues reacted to the manner in which they responded to the recent incident in Paris, in which women employees of the Eiffel Tower were asked to remain "invisible" on September 5 when 100 BAPS sadhus visited one of the world's top tourist destinations.