Skip to main content

Making aadhaar must for anganwadis will exclude migrants' children: GoI told

Counterview Desk

In a letter to Indevar Pandey, secretary, Ministry of Women and Child Development, Government of India (GoI), the well-known civil rights group Right to Food Campaign (RtFC) has said that while it may be “important” to include migrants in the anganwadi programmes, this should not be done at the cost of another form of exclusion due to aadhaar linking and digitalization-related problems.
Condemning any attempt to make aadhaar mandatory for any child to access basic entitlements through anganwadi centres and schools, RtFC said, schemes be made truly universal, whereby any child or woman who accesses an anganwadi centre is provided with the services without any further requirements.

Text:

An article in the Indian Express on June 19, 2022 reported that the Ministry of Women and Child Development is working towards the inclusion of migrants in the anganwadi programme. While this is a positive step, it is worrying that this seems to be based on digitization and aadhaar linking of the beneficiaries.
Beneficiaries under the anganwadi scheme are children under six years of age and pregnant and lactating women. Supplementary nutrition for these target groups, as well as all other services of the ICDS including preschool education, nutrition and health counselling and growth monitoring, are universal services without any eligibility requirements.
In repeated orders in the ‘Right to Food case’ (PUCL vs Union of India & Ors., CWP 196/2001) the Supreme Court has clearly stated that every child under six years of age, every pregnant and lactating woman and every adolescent girl is entitled to all services of the ICDS.
Towards this, the Supreme Court had also mandated that every rural hamlet and urban slum must have an Anganwadi centre. Further, any community with 40 or more children under the age of six who do not have access to an Anganwadi centre can demand one and should be provided with the same within 90 days of the demand being made.
Supplementary nutrition under ICDS, through the Anganwadi centres, is also a legal entitlement under the National Food Security Act (NFSA). Under the NFSA as well, this is a universal entitlement making every child under six years of age and every pregnant and lactating woman eligible.
Towards meeting these obligations, the services of ICDS must be accessible to the target groups without any mandatory requirements like residence proof, aadhaar etc. Just the mere presence of a young child or a pregnant/lactating woman at an anganwadi centre is enough for them to be given supplementary nutrition. However, in practice, this is not how it works. Only those who are registered beneficiaries are provided services, and only ‘usual residents’ are registered.
By linking aadhaar to ICDS, the government is only creating another layer of exclusion in a programme that is supposed to be universal. Experiences of other schemes such as PDS have clearly shown the difficulties created for many, by mandatory aadhaar-seeding and aadhaar-based authentication towards accessing rightful entitlements. There are issues related to errors in biometric authentication, network problems, faulty aadhaar-seeding and much more.
In the case of children, even the Supreme Court in its aadhaar judgment has clearly stated that children cannot be forced to get an aadhaar and that they should be given an option to exit when they attain adulthood. Bringing an aadhaar into the ICDS would be a violation of children’s rights.
In the present scenario, where the guidelines issued by UIDAI prohibit the capturing of fingerprints and iris of children during enrollment, it is unclear how the government proposes to use Aadhaar to track the delivery of food supplements to children under ICDS.
Given high levels of malnutrition, access to meals through the anganwadi centres is critical for migrant labourers' children
In any case, Aadhaar Saturation in children between 0 to 5 years of age is less than 35% and any attempt to make Aadhar mandatory for accessing ICDS will have adverse consequences and potentially lead to large-scale exclusions.
It is also pertinent to note that recently the CAG had flagged several anomalies in the system for issuing Aadhaar to children below the age of five years and had severely criticised the avoidable expenditure on the issue of 'Bal Aadhaars' and the arbitrary practice of enrolling children based on biometrics of their parents, noting that, "Issue of Aadhaar numbers to minor children below the age of five, based on the biometrics of their parents, without confirming the uniqueness of biometric identity goes against the basic tenet of the Aadhaar Act,".
Given the high levels of malnutrition in the country, access to meals through the anganwadi centres is critical for many. This is especially so for those belonging to families that are poor and marginal communities, including migrant labour.
What is required is to remove all barriers for all children towards accessing these services by simplifying identity and residence documentation requirements. Rather, what this move seems to be doing is to only make it even more difficult for children to access these services.
The Right to Food Campaign condemns any attempt to make aadhaar mandatory for any child to access their basic entitlements through anganwadi centres and schools. We demand that the schemes be made truly universal, whereby any child or woman who accesses an Anganwadi centre is provided with the services without any further requirements.
We also call upon the government to place in the public domain the details of the proposed changes to the ICDS and hold public consultations as also mandatorily required under the Pre Legislative Consultation Policy.
ICDS has been a lifeline for children especially as families have struggled to make ends meet through the COVID crisis and the accompanying economic distress and any disruption of the services can have serious ramifications on the health of children.

Comments

TRENDING

From algorithms to exploitation: New report exposes plight of India's gig workers

By Jag Jivan   The recent report, "State of Finance in India Report 2024-25," released by a coalition including the Centre for Financial Accountability, Focus on the Global South, and other organizations, paints a stark picture of India's burgeoning digital economy, particularly highlighting the exploitation faced by gig workers on platform-based services. 

'Condonation of war crimes against women and children’: IPSN on Trump’s Gaza Board

By A Representative   The India-Palestine Solidarity Network (IPSN) has strongly condemned the announcement of a proposed “Board of Peace” for Gaza and Palestine by former US President Donald J. Trump, calling it an initiative that “condones war crimes against children and women” and “rubs salt in Palestinian wounds.”

Gig workers hold online strike on republic day; nationwide protests planned on February 3

By A Representative   Gig and platform service workers across the country observed a nationwide online strike on Republic Day, responding to a call given by the Gig & Platform Service Workers Union (GIPSWU) to protest what it described as exploitation, insecurity and denial of basic worker rights in the platform economy. The union said women gig workers led the January 26 action by switching off their work apps as a mark of protest.

India’s road to sustainability: Why alternative fuels matter beyond electric vehicles

By Suyash Gupta*  India’s worsening air quality makes the shift towards clean mobility urgent. However, while electric vehicles (EVs) are central to India’s strategy, they alone cannot address the country’s diverse pollution and energy challenges.

Jayanthi Natarajan "never stood by tribals' rights" in MNC Vedanta's move to mine Niyamigiri Hills in Odisha

By A Representative The Odisha Chapter of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity (CSD), which played a vital role in the struggle for the enactment of historic Forest Rights Act, 2006 has blamed former Union environment minister Jaynaynthi Natarjan for failing to play any vital role to defend the tribals' rights in the forest areas during her tenure under the former UPA government. Countering her recent statement that she rejected environmental clearance to Vendanta, the top UK-based NMC, despite tremendous pressure from her colleagues in Cabinet and huge criticism from industry, and the claim that her decision was “upheld by the Supreme Court”, the CSD said this is simply not true, and actually she "disrespected" FRA.

Stands 'exposed': Cavalier attitude towards rushed construction of Char Dham project

By Bharat Dogra*  The nation heaved a big sigh of relief when the 41 workers trapped in the under-construction Silkyara-Barkot tunnel (Uttarkashi district of Uttarakhand) were finally rescued on November 28 after a 17-day rescue effort. All those involved in the rescue effort deserve a big thanks of the entire country. The government deserves appreciation for providing all-round support.

Whither space for the marginalised in Kerala's privately-driven townships after landslides?

By Ipshita Basu, Sudheesh R.C.  In the early hours of July 30 2024, a landslide in the Wayanad district of Kerala state, India, killed 400 people. The Punjirimattom, Mundakkai, Vellarimala and Chooralmala villages in the Western Ghats mountain range turned into a dystopian rubble of uprooted trees and debris.

Over 40% of gig workers earn below ₹15,000 a month: Economic Survey

By A Representative   The Finance Minister, Nirmala Sitharaman, while reviewing the Economic Survey in Parliament on Tuesday, highlighted the rapid growth of gig and platform workers in India. According to the Survey, the number of gig workers has increased from 7.7 million to around 12 million, marking a growth of about 55 percent. Their share in the overall workforce is projected to rise from 2 percent to 6.7 percent, with gig workers expected to contribute approximately ₹2.35 lakh crore to the GDP by 2030. The Survey also noted that over 40 percent of gig workers earn less than ₹15,000 per month.

Fragmented opposition and identity politics shaping Tamil Nadu’s 2026 election battle

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  Tamil Nadu is set to go to the polls in April 2026, and the political battle lines are beginning to take shape. Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to the state on January 23, 2026, marked the formal launch of the Bharatiya Janata Party’s campaign against the ruling Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK). Addressing multiple public meetings, the Prime Minister accused the DMK government of corruption, criminality, and dynastic politics, and called for Tamil Nadu to be “freed from DMK’s chains.” PM Modi alleged that the DMK had turned Tamil Nadu into a drug-ridden state and betrayed public trust by governing through what he described as “Corruption, Mafia and Crime,” derisively terming it “CMC rule.” He claimed that despite making numerous promises, the DMK had failed to deliver meaningful development. He also targeted what he described as the party’s dynastic character, arguing that the government functioned primarily for the benefit of a single family a...