Skip to main content

Uttarakhand tragedy: How govt 'ignored' dam reports, warning from environmentalists

By Vimal Bhai* 
Uttarakhand again witnessed a catastrophe. Local residents of Raini village, goat grazing herders and labourers working in the (13.5 MW) Rishi Ganga Power Project have been declared dead or missing in the sudden flood in Rishi Ganga in Chamoli district.
After that, the deluge reached Dhauliganga, destroyed the entire dam of Tapovan Vishnugad's power project (520 MW) and filled the debris and silt in the tunnels leading to the power house. The workers employed in the tunnel of this project are still missing. Some dead bodies have been found and many more are still missing. The exact number of people killed and missing is not clear yet.
On the other hand, the number of people who were actually killed will never be revealed because the authorities will only talk about the registered labours. There is no record of the number of small contractors involved and how many people were working with them. Till date, there is no complete record of the missing and killed people in the disaster of June 2013.
The nature is being blamed for the whole incident. The news of breaking glaciers is being widely publicized but there is no statement or discussion on the delicate ecology of the Himalayas for the creation of such large projects, the use of uncontrolled explosives, cutting down of forests, and complete neglect of environmental laws and regulations.
Governments have so far ignored dam reports, warnings from environmentalists, warnings of nature. Being situated in the central Himalayas, Uttarakhand state is full of natural beauty, but at the same time there is always the risk of natural disasters. Constant tampering with nature makes such disaster more frightening.
The loss of life and property due to the so-called glacier rupture incident of February 7, 2021 would have been bare minimal, if these two mega dams were not constructed. Governments should see that it is because of these projects that laborers and other workers, residents of the village and Bakarwal have been killed. 
The people of Raini village constantly raised the issue of excessive use of explosives for construction of projects. Villagers also went to the Uttarakhand High Court and the court gave the responsibility to the District Magistrate.
We at Matu Jansangthan also challenged the environmental clearance of the Tapovan-Vishnugad project in the then "National Environmental Appellate Authority", which was cancelled by the Authority on the issue of filing this appeal after the deadline. Even after this, we kept raising all the issues related to the environment, but the government never paid any attention. We believe that the local administration, the concerned departments of Uttarakhand state and the Union Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) are responsible for the environmental violations in both projects.
Former chief minister of Uttarakhand late Narayan Dutt Tiwari said after the Tehri Dam that no such big dam will be built in future. Despite that the public hearing of Pancheshwar and Rupali Gad dam on Mahakali River were held in 2017 with full deception. The government is moving forward with a large Kishau dam on the Tons River. It is an invitation to another direct disaster.
The impact of so-called glacier rupture incident of February 7 would have been bare minimal, if two mega dams were not constructed
After the June 2013 disaster, the Supreme Court, in the case of "Alaknanda Hydro Power Company Limited v. Anuj Joshi and others", took cognizance of the Uttarakhand disaster and ordered the central and state government not to sanction any dam project in Uttarakhand. And the Government should assess the impact of hydropower projects on the rivers.
MoEFCC limited the order of the Supreme Court to some rivers of Ganges. The Supreme Court never held MoEFCC accountable for limiting its order. The committee headed by Ravi Chopra recommended stoppage of 23 out of 24 projects stated in the 2012 report of Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun. But the Supreme Court stayed all the 24 projects.
After this, MoEFCC formed a new committee and recommended that six of the 24 major projects be taken forward. The Central Electricity Authority also formed a committee.
But the joint affidavit from the Ministry of Jal Shakti, Power Ministry and MoEFCC which was to be filed in the Supreme Court has not been furnished till date. The Supreme Court has not held any hearing for a long time. The Supreme Court is guilty of not hearing such a significant and critical case related to climate change and killings of people. Therefore, the Supreme Court is also responsible for this accident.
Whereas in 2016, the then Power Minister Piyush Goyal had said that we are producing more electricity than required. According to government data, if the current power projects also produce 70 to 75%, then we have no need for new projects. Then what is the need of such projects in such sensitive areas of the Himalayas? 
It is also a matter of fact that rehabilitation and environmental conditions have not been fulfilled literally even in a single dam project in Uttarakhand. The same has happened here. Dams change the natural calamity of any river into a formidable form. The Ravi Chopra Committee mentioned this clearly in its report.
We have many such examples in the June 2013 disaster. If the Vishnuprayag dam built on the Alaknanda River did not break, then the bridges below would not have brokn. Thousands of pilgrims of Badrinath ji and Hemkund Saheb would not have got stuck. Because of Srinagar dam on the same river, the government and non-government property of the lower area became submerged. People are still fighting for the compensation.
The government did not learn any lessons from the June, 2013 disaster. The Supreme Court has not taken any concrete steps on this till date.
Apart from Matu Janasangathan, Himalayan lovers and environmentalists of the Uttarakhand and the country warned the government in 2013 on the issue that such accidents can happen again, so big projects should be stopped.
  • Accountability of public representatives, policymakers, officers and government should be fixed on all these issues. They are the ones who lead these dams for so called ‘development’ and power.
  • Orders should be issued to furnish the complete records the labourers working in all projects.
---
*With Matu Jansangthan, a National Alliance of Peoples' Movements associate

Comments

Post a Comment

TRENDING

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

  By Rajiv Shah   This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.
1 comment
»

Love letters in a lifelong war: Babusha Kohli’s resistance in verse

By Ravi Ranjan*  “War does not determine who is right—only who is left.” Bertrand Russell’s words echo hauntingly in our times, and few contemporary Hindi poets embody this truth as profoundly as Babusha Kohli. Emerging from Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Kohli has carved a unique space in literature by weaving together tenderness, protest, and philosophy across poetry, prose, and cinema. Her work is not merely artistic expression—it is resistance, refuge, and a call for peace.
Post a Comment
»

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.
59 comments
»

Asbestos contamination in children’s products highlights global oversight gaps

By A Representative   A commentary published by the International Ban Asbestos Secretariat (IBAS) has drawn attention to the challenges governments face in responding effectively to global public-health risks. In an article written by Laurie Kazan-Allen and published on March 5, 2026, the author examines how the discovery of asbestos contamination in children’s play products has raised questions about regulatory oversight and international product safety. The article opens by reflecting on lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that governments in several countries were slow to respond to early warning signs of the crisis. Referring to the experience of the United Kingdom, the author writes that delays in implementing protective measures contributed to “232,112 recorded deaths and over a million people suffering from long Covid.” The commentary uses this example to illustrate what it describes as the dangers of underestimating emerging threats. Attention then turns...
Post a Comment
»

Echoes of Vietnam and Chile: The devastating cost of the I-A Axis in Iran

​ By Ram Puniyani  ​The recent joint military actions by Israel and the United States against Iran have been devastating. Like all wars, this conflict is brutal to its core, leaving a trail of human suffering in its wake. The stated pretext for this aggression—the brutality of the Ayatollah Khamenei regime and its nuclear ambitions—clashes sharply with the reality of the diplomatic landscape. Iran had expressed a willingness to remain at the negotiating table, signaling a readiness to concede points emerging from dialogue. 
Post a Comment
»

Authoritarian destruction of the public sphere in Ecuador: Trumpism in action?

By Pilar Troya Fernández  The situation in Ecuador under Daniel Noboa's government is one of authoritarianism advancing on several fronts simultaneously to consolidate neoliberalism and total submission to the US international agenda. These are not isolated measures, but rather a coordinated strategy that combines job insecurity, the dismantling of the welfare state, unrestricted access to mining, the continuation of oil exploitation without environmental considerations, the centralization of power through the financial suffocation of local governments, and the systematic criminalization of all forms of opposition and popular organization.
Post a Comment
»

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".
51 comments
»

The kitchen as prison: A feminist elegy for domestic slavery

By Garima Srivastava* Kumar Ambuj stands as one of the most incisive voices in contemporary Hindi poetry. His work, stripped of ornamentation, speaks directly to the lived realities of India’s marginalized—women, the rural poor, and those crushed under invisible forms of violence. His celebrated poem “Women Who Cook” (Khānā Banātī Striyāṃ) is not merely about food preparation; it is a searing indictment of patriarchal domestic structures that reduce women’s existence to endless, unpaid labour.
Post a Comment
»

The price of silence: Why Modi won’t follow Shastri, appeal for sacrifice

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey*  ​In 1965, as India grappled with war and a crippling food crisis, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri faced a United States that used wheat shipments under the PL-480 agreement as a lever to dictate Indian foreign policy. Shastri’s response remains legendary: he appealed to the nation to skip one meal a day. Millions of middle-class households complied, choosing temporary hunger over the sacrifice of national dignity. Today, India faces a modern equivalent in the energy sector, yet the leadership’s response stands in stark contrast to that era of self-reliance.
Post a Comment
»